%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : LCL230+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 09:24:43 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 4.67s 2.14s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   7 unt;   2 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   13 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    0 (   0 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   4 prp; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( p
    | r
    | ~ q ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-syi6cwve/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    q,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-syi6cwve/input.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-syi6cwve/input.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-syi6cwve/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( p
    | r
    | ~ q ),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    q,
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p,
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r,
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]),c_0_11]),c_0_12]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : LCL230+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Sun Jul  3 23:02:48 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 4.67/2.14  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 4.67/2.14  # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.67/2.14  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 4.67/2.14  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA
% 4.67/2.14  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 4.67/2.14  #
% 4.67/2.14  # Preprocessing time       : 0.023 s
% 4.67/2.14  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.67/2.14  
% 4.67/2.14  # Proof found!
% 4.67/2.14  # SZS status Theorem
% 4.67/2.14  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.67/2.14  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 4.67/2.14  
% 4.67/2.14  # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.67/2.14  # User time                : 0.022 s
% 4.67/2.14  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 4.67/2.14  # Total time               : 0.028 s
% 4.67/2.14  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 4.67/2.14  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------