TSTP Solution File: LCL221-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL221-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:28:49 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 7.70s 7.95s
% Output : Refutation 7.70s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LCL221-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 00:41:00 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.35 The process was started by sandbox2 on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.35 Sun Jul 3 00:41:00 2022
% 0.19/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 11149.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.19/0.35 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.19/0.35 in usable.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 4
% 0.19/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.19/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 44
% 0.19/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 7
% 0.19/0.39 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.19/0.39 distinct function count: 2
% 0.19/0.39 distinct constant count: 3
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.58/0.83
% 0.58/0.83
% 0.58/0.83 Changing weight limit from 60 to 45.
% 0.58/0.83
% 0.58/0.83 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.58/0.83
% 0.58/0.83 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.58/0.83
% 0.58/0.83 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.58/0.83
% 0.58/0.83 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.58/0.83
% 0.58/0.83 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.58/0.83
% 0.58/0.83 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.58/0.83
% 0.58/0.83 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 0.58/0.83
% 0.58/0.83
% 0.58/0.83 Resetting weight limit to 45 after 985 givens.
% 0.58/0.83
% 0.58/0.84
% 0.58/0.84
% 0.58/0.84 Changing weight limit from 45 to 39.
% 0.58/0.84
% 0.58/0.84 Resetting weight limit to 39 after 990 givens.
% 0.58/0.84
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84 Changing weight limit from 39 to 37.
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84 Resetting weight limit to 37 after 995 givens.
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84 Changing weight limit from 37 to 36.
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.84 Resetting weight limit to 36 after 1000 givens.
% 0.67/0.84
% 0.67/0.85
% 0.67/0.85
% 0.67/0.85 Changing weight limit from 36 to 35.
% 0.67/0.85
% 0.67/0.85 Resetting weight limit to 35 after 1005 givens.
% 0.67/0.85
% 1.50/1.72
% 1.50/1.72
% 1.50/1.72 Changing weight limit from 35 to 34.
% 1.50/1.72
% 1.50/1.72 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 3150 givens.
% 1.50/1.72
% 1.50/1.72
% 1.50/1.72
% 1.50/1.72 Changing weight limit from 34 to 32.
% 1.50/1.72
% 1.50/1.72 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 3155 givens.
% 1.50/1.72
% 1.50/1.73
% 1.50/1.73
% 1.50/1.73 Changing weight limit from 32 to 31.
% 1.50/1.73
% 1.50/1.73 Resetting weight limit to 31 after 3165 givens.
% 1.50/1.73
% 1.50/1.73
% 1.50/1.73
% 1.50/1.73 Changing weight limit from 31 to 28.
% 1.50/1.73
% 1.50/1.73 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 3170 givens.
% 1.50/1.73
% 1.50/1.74
% 1.50/1.74
% 1.50/1.74 Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 1.50/1.74
% 1.50/1.74 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 3180 givens.
% 1.50/1.74
% 1.50/1.74
% 1.50/1.74
% 1.50/1.74 Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 1.50/1.74
% 1.50/1.74 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 3190 givens.
% 1.50/1.74
% 1.50/1.74
% 1.50/1.74
% 1.50/1.74 Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 1.50/1.74
% 1.50/1.74 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 3200 givens.
% 1.50/1.74
% 1.50/1.75
% 1.50/1.75
% 1.50/1.75 Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 1.50/1.75
% 1.50/1.75 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 3230 givens.
% 1.50/1.75
% 1.50/1.77
% 1.50/1.77
% 1.50/1.77 Changing weight limit from 24 to 23.
% 1.50/1.77
% 1.50/1.77 Resetting weight limit to 23 after 3260 givens.
% 1.50/1.77
% 1.61/1.81
% 1.61/1.81
% 1.61/1.81 Changing weight limit from 23 to 22.
% 1.61/1.81
% 1.61/1.81 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 3370 givens.
% 1.61/1.81
% 1.64/1.84
% 1.64/1.84
% 1.64/1.84 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 1.64/1.84
% 1.64/1.84 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 3430 givens.
% 1.64/1.84
% 1.73/1.92
% 1.73/1.92
% 1.73/1.92 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 1.73/1.92
% 1.73/1.92 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 3610 givens.
% 1.73/1.92
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.73/1.94 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 3660 givens.
% 1.73/1.94
% 1.94/2.13
% 1.94/2.13
% 1.94/2.13 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 1.94/2.13
% 1.94/2.13 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 4205 givens.
% 1.94/2.13
% 1.96/2.17
% 1.96/2.17
% 1.96/2.17 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 1.96/2.17
% 1.96/2.17 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 4320 givens.
% 1.96/2.17
% 7.70/7.95
% 7.70/7.95 -------- PROOF --------
% 7.70/7.95 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 7.70/7.95 % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.70/7.95
% 7.70/7.95 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 7.45 sec ----> 51129 [binary,51128.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 7.70/7.95
% 7.70/7.95 Length of proof is 11. Level of proof is 11.
% 7.70/7.95
% 7.70/7.95 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 7.70/7.95 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 7.70/7.95 % SZS output start Refutation
% 7.70/7.95
% 7.70/7.95 1 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(A).
% 7.70/7.95 2 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(or(not(B),A))| -theorem(B).
% 7.70/7.95 3 [] {+} theorem(or(not(A),B))| -axiom(or(not(A),C))| -theorem(or(not(C),B)).
% 7.70/7.95 4 [] {+} -theorem(or(not(or(not(p),q)),or(not(or(or(p,q),r)),or(q,r)))).
% 7.70/7.95 5 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(A,A)),A)).
% 7.70/7.95 6 [] {+} axiom(or(not(A),or(B,A))).
% 7.70/7.95 7 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))).
% 7.70/7.95 8 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 7.70/7.95 9 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))).
% 7.70/7.95 12 [hyper,7,1] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))).
% 7.70/7.95 15 [hyper,12,3,5] {-} theorem(or(not(or(or(A,B),or(A,B))),or(B,A))).
% 7.70/7.95 115 [hyper,15,3,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(or(A,B),B))),or(B,A))).
% 7.70/7.95 574 [hyper,115,3,6] {-} theorem(or(not(or(or(A,B),B)),or(B,A))).
% 7.70/7.95 591 [hyper,574,2,9] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(or(B,C),C))),or(A,or(C,B)))).
% 7.70/7.95 3858 [hyper,591,3,9] {-} theorem(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(or(C,B),A)),or(B,C)))).
% 7.70/7.95 19894 [hyper,3858,2,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(or(A,B),C)),or(not(or(not(C),B)),or(B,A)))).
% 7.70/7.95 30354 [hyper,19894,3,7] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(not(or(not(A),C)),or(C,B)))).
% 7.70/7.95 38184 [hyper,30354,3,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(not(or(not(B),C)),or(C,A)))).
% 7.70/7.95 44948 [hyper,38184,3,7] {-} theorem(or(not(or(or(A,B),C)),or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(B,C)))).
% 7.70/7.95 51128 [hyper,44948,2,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(or(A,B),C)),or(B,C)))).
% 7.70/7.95 51129 [binary,51128.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 7.70/7.95
% 7.70/7.95 % SZS output end Refutation
% 7.70/7.95 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 7.70/7.95
% 7.70/7.95
% 7.70/7.95 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 7.70/7.95
% 7.70/7.95
% 7.70/7.95 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 7.70/7.95
% 7.70/7.95 ============ end of search ============
% 7.70/7.95
% 7.70/7.95 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 7.70/7.95
% 7.70/7.95 true clauses given 8888 (33.8%)
% 7.70/7.95 false clauses given 17411
% 7.70/7.95
% 7.70/7.95 FALSE TRUE
% 7.70/7.95 15 0 769
% 7.70/7.95 16 0 20
% 7.70/7.95 17 2243 1712
% 7.70/7.95 tot: 2243 2501 (52.7% true)
% 7.70/7.95
% 7.70/7.95
% 7.70/7.95 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 7.70/7.95
% 7.70/7.95 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 7.70/7.95
% 7.70/7.95 Process 11149 finished Sun Jul 3 00:41:07 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------