TSTP Solution File: LCL216-1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : LCL216-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:48:30 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.50s 0.76s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.50s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.10  % Problem    : LCL216-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.10/0.11  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Fri Aug 25 07:20:23 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.50/0.75  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.75  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.50/0.75  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.50/0.75  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.50/0.75  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.50/0.75  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.50/0.75  
% 0.50/0.75  % Result      :Theorem 0.130000s
% 0.50/0.75  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.130000s
% 0.50/0.75  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.76  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.76  % File     : LCL216-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.50/0.76  % Domain   : Logic Calculi (Propositional)
% 0.50/0.76  % Problem  : Principia Mathematica 2.64
% 0.50/0.76  % Version  : [WR27] axioms : Reduced & Augmented.
% 0.50/0.76  % English  :
% 0.50/0.76  
% 0.50/0.76  % Refs     : [WR27]  Whitehead & Russell (1927), Principia Mathematica
% 0.50/0.76  %          : [NSS63] Newell et al. (1963), Empirical Explorations with the
% 0.50/0.76  %          : [ORo89] O'Rourke (1989), LT Revisited: Explanation-Based Learn
% 0.50/0.76  %          : [SE94]  Segre & Elkan (1994), A High-Performance Explanation-B
% 0.50/0.76  % Source   : [SE94]
% 0.50/0.76  % Names    : Problem 2.64 [WR27]
% 0.50/0.76  
% 0.50/0.76  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 0.50/0.76  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.06 v5.4.0, 0.11 v5.3.0, 0.20 v5.2.0, 0.08 v5.1.0, 0.06 v5.0.0, 0.07 v4.0.1, 0.00 v2.2.1, 0.22 v2.1.0, 0.38 v2.0.0
% 0.50/0.76  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
% 0.50/0.76  %            Number of literals    :   14 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
% 0.50/0.76  %            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
% 0.50/0.76  %            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
% 0.50/0.76  %            Number of predicates  :    2 (   2 usr;   0 prp; 1-1 aty)
% 0.50/0.76  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
% 0.50/0.76  %            Number of variables   :   17 (   1 sgn)
% 0.50/0.76  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 0.50/0.76  
% 0.50/0.76  % Comments : Reduced to use only or and not, and includes a redundant rule
% 0.50/0.76  %            of transitivity of implication, and a reduced rule of
% 0.50/0.76  %            detachment.
% 0.50/0.76  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.76  %----Include axioms of propositional logic
% 0.50/0.76  include('Axioms/LCL003-0.ax').
% 0.50/0.76  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.76  cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
% 0.50/0.76      ~ theorem(or(not(or(p,q)),or(not(or(p,not(q))),p))) ).
% 0.50/0.76  
% 0.50/0.76  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.76  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.76  % Proof found
% 0.50/0.76  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.50/0.76  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.50/0.76  %ClaNum:9(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.50/0.76  %VarNum:34(SingletonVarNum:17)
% 0.50/0.76  %MaxLitNum:3
% 0.50/0.76  %MaxfuncDepth:5
% 0.50/0.76  %SharedTerms:9
% 0.50/0.76  %goalClause: 6
% 0.50/0.76  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.50/0.76  [6]~P2(f2(f1(f2(a3,a4)),f2(f1(f2(a3,f1(a4))),a3)))
% 0.50/0.76  [2]P1(f2(f1(f2(x21,x21)),x21))
% 0.50/0.76  [1]P1(f2(f1(x11),f2(x12,x11)))
% 0.50/0.76  [3]P1(f2(f1(f2(x31,x32)),f2(x32,x31)))
% 0.50/0.76  [4]P1(f2(f1(f2(x41,f2(x42,x43))),f2(x42,f2(x41,x43))))
% 0.50/0.76  [5]P1(f2(f1(f2(f1(x51),x52)),f2(f1(f2(x53,x51)),f2(x53,x52))))
% 0.50/0.76  [7]~P1(x71)+P2(x71)
% 0.50/0.76  [8]P2(x81)+~P2(x82)+~P1(f2(f1(x82),x81))
% 0.50/0.76  [9]~P2(f2(f1(x93),x92))+P2(f2(f1(x91),x92))+~P1(f2(f1(x91),x93))
% 0.50/0.76  %EqnAxiom
% 0.50/0.76  
% 0.50/0.76  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.50/0.77  cnf(11,plain,
% 0.50/0.77     (~P2(f2(f1(f2(a3,f1(a4))),a3))),
% 0.50/0.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[6,1,7,8])).
% 0.50/0.77  cnf(37,plain,
% 0.50/0.77     (P2(f2(f1(f2(x371,x371)),x371))),
% 0.50/0.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,7])).
% 0.50/0.77  cnf(49,plain,
% 0.50/0.77     (P2(f2(f1(f2(x491,f2(x492,x493))),f2(x492,f2(x491,x493))))),
% 0.50/0.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,7])).
% 0.50/0.77  cnf(57,plain,
% 0.50/0.77     (~P2(f2(f1(f2(a3,f1(a4))),f2(f1(f2(a3,a4)),a3)))),
% 0.50/0.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,6,8])).
% 0.50/0.77  cnf(88,plain,
% 0.50/0.77     (~P2(a3)),
% 0.50/0.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[11,1,8])).
% 0.50/0.77  cnf(116,plain,
% 0.50/0.77     (~P2(f2(a3,a3))),
% 0.50/0.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[88,2,8])).
% 0.50/0.77  cnf(171,plain,
% 0.50/0.77     (P2(f2(f1(f2(x1711,f2(x1712,x1712))),f2(x1711,x1712)))),
% 0.50/0.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[37,5,8])).
% 0.50/0.77  cnf(210,plain,
% 0.50/0.77     (~P2(f2(f1(f2(f1(a4),a3)),f2(f1(f2(a3,a4)),a3)))),
% 0.50/0.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[49,57,5,3,8,9])).
% 0.50/0.77  cnf(222,plain,
% 0.50/0.77     ($false),
% 0.50/0.77     inference(scs_inference,[],[210,171,116,2,5,8,9]),
% 0.50/0.77     ['proof']).
% 0.50/0.77  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.50/0.77  % Total time :0.130000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------