TSTP Solution File: LCL210-3 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL210-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:28:42 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.67s 3.89s
% Output : Refutation 3.67s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : LCL210-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 01:16:24 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.11/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n003.cluster.edu,
% 0.11/0.35 Sun Jul 3 01:16:24 2022
% 0.11/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 3620.
% 0.11/0.35
% 0.11/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.11/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.11/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.11/0.35
% 0.11/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.11/0.35
% 0.11/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.11/0.35
% 0.11/0.35 This is a Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.11/0.35 Knuth-Bendix and hyper_res, with positive clauses in
% 0.11/0.35 sos and nonpositive clauses in usable.
% 0.11/0.35
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.11/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.11/0.35
% 0.11/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.11/0.35
% 0.11/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.11/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [copy,12,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.11/0.35
% 0.11/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.11/0.38 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.11/0.38 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.11/0.38 number of clauses in intial UL: 3
% 0.11/0.38 number of clauses initially in problem: 11
% 0.11/0.38 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 27
% 0.11/0.38 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 87
% 0.11/0.38 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.11/0.38 absolute distinct symbol count: 8
% 0.11/0.38 distinct predicate count: 3
% 0.11/0.38 distinct function count: 3
% 0.11/0.38 distinct constant count: 2
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.11/0.38
% 0.11/0.38 =========== start of search ===========
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Changing weight limit from 60 to 36.
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Model 5 [ 1 2 38636 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Model 6 [ 1 1 8052 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Model 7 [ 21 2 17929 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Model 8 [ 1 1 1982 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Model 9 [ 22 2 27658 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Model 10 [ 1 1 1451 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Model 11 [ 1 1 8542 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Model 12 [ 22 0 1967 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Model 13 [ 1 3 33513 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.73/2.91 Resetting weight limit to 36 after 315 givens.
% 2.73/2.91
% 2.76/2.99
% 2.76/2.99
% 2.76/2.99 Changing weight limit from 36 to 32.
% 2.76/2.99
% 2.76/2.99 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 335 givens.
% 2.76/2.99
% 2.83/3.01
% 2.83/3.01
% 2.83/3.01 Changing weight limit from 32 to 28.
% 2.83/3.01
% 2.83/3.01 Resetting weight limit to 28 after 340 givens.
% 2.83/3.01
% 2.90/3.10
% 2.90/3.10
% 2.90/3.10 Changing weight limit from 28 to 26.
% 2.90/3.10
% 2.90/3.10 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 350 givens.
% 2.90/3.10
% 2.90/3.16
% 2.90/3.16
% 2.90/3.16 Changing weight limit from 26 to 24.
% 2.90/3.16
% 2.90/3.16 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 360 givens.
% 2.90/3.16
% 3.07/3.25
% 3.07/3.25
% 3.07/3.25 Changing weight limit from 24 to 22.
% 3.07/3.25
% 3.07/3.25 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 370 givens.
% 3.07/3.25
% 3.07/3.29
% 3.07/3.29
% 3.07/3.29 Changing weight limit from 22 to 20.
% 3.07/3.29
% 3.07/3.29 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 380 givens.
% 3.07/3.29
% 3.14/3.38
% 3.14/3.38
% 3.14/3.38 Changing weight limit from 20 to 18.
% 3.14/3.38
% 3.14/3.38 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 405 givens.
% 3.14/3.38
% 3.31/3.49
% 3.31/3.49
% 3.31/3.49 Changing weight limit from 18 to 16.
% 3.31/3.49
% 3.31/3.49 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 415 givens.
% 3.31/3.49
% 3.45/3.61
% 3.45/3.61
% 3.45/3.61 Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 3.45/3.61
% 3.45/3.61 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 450 givens.
% 3.45/3.61
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89 -------- PROOF --------
% 3.67/3.89 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.67/3.89 % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 3.50 sec ----> 11484 [binary,11483.1,3.1] {+} $F.
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89 Length of proof is 18. Level of proof is 8.
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 3.67/3.89 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.67/3.89 % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89 1 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(A).
% 3.67/3.89 2 [] {+} theorem(A)| -theorem(implies(B,A))| -theorem(B).
% 3.67/3.89 3 [] {+} -theorem(implies(not(p),implies(or(p,q),q))).
% 3.67/3.89 4 [] {+} axiom(implies(or(A,A),A)).
% 3.67/3.89 5 [] {+} axiom(implies(A,or(B,A))).
% 3.67/3.89 6 [] {+} axiom(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A))).
% 3.67/3.89 7 [] {+} axiom(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 3.67/3.89 8 [] {-} axiom(implies(implies(A,B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B)))).
% 3.67/3.89 9 [] {-} implies(A,B)=or(not(A),B).
% 3.67/3.89 11,10 [copy,9,flip.1] {+} or(not(A),B)=implies(A,B).
% 3.67/3.89 13 [hyper,4,1] {+} theorem(implies(or(A,A),A)).
% 3.67/3.89 14 [hyper,5,1] {+} theorem(implies(A,or(B,A))).
% 3.67/3.89 15 [hyper,6,1] {+} theorem(implies(or(A,B),or(B,A))).
% 3.67/3.89 20 [hyper,7,1] {-} theorem(implies(or(A,or(B,C)),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 3.67/3.89 24 [para_into,15.1.1.2,10.1.1] {-} theorem(implies(or(A,not(B)),implies(B,A))).
% 3.67/3.89 27 [para_into,24.1.1.1,10.1.1] {-} theorem(implies(implies(A,not(B)),implies(B,not(A)))).
% 3.67/3.89 28 [hyper,8,1] {-} theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(or(C,A),or(C,B)))).
% 3.67/3.89 46 [para_into,20.1.1.1,10.1.1,demod,11] {+} theorem(implies(implies(A,or(B,C)),or(B,implies(A,C)))).
% 3.67/3.89 56 [hyper,28,2,13] {-} theorem(implies(or(A,or(B,B)),or(A,B))).
% 3.67/3.89 91 [para_into,56.1.1.1,10.1.1,demod,11] {-} theorem(implies(implies(A,or(B,B)),implies(A,B))).
% 3.67/3.89 176 [hyper,91,2,14] {+} theorem(implies(A,A)).
% 3.67/3.89 180 [hyper,176,2,27] {+} theorem(implies(A,not(not(A)))).
% 3.67/3.89 203 [hyper,180,2,28] {-} theorem(implies(or(A,B),or(A,not(not(B))))).
% 3.67/3.89 619 [hyper,46,2,176] {+} theorem(or(A,implies(or(A,B),B))).
% 3.67/3.89 4508 [hyper,619,2,15] {+} theorem(or(implies(or(A,B),B),A)).
% 3.67/3.89 11444 [hyper,4508,2,203] {-} theorem(or(implies(or(A,B),B),not(not(A)))).
% 3.67/3.89 11483 [hyper,11444,2,24] {-} theorem(implies(not(A),implies(or(A,B),B))).
% 3.67/3.89 11484 [binary,11483.1,3.1] {+} $F.
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89 % SZS output end Refutation
% 3.67/3.89 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89 ============ end of search ============
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89 true clauses given 201 (37.4%)
% 3.67/3.89 false clauses given 337
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89 FALSE TRUE
% 3.67/3.89 8 0 18
% 3.67/3.89 9 0 134
% 3.67/3.89 10 0 533
% 3.67/3.89 11 1 448
% 3.67/3.89 12 131 1054
% 3.67/3.89 13 683 378
% 3.67/3.89 14 998 12
% 3.67/3.89 15 703 3
% 3.67/3.89 tot: 2516 2580 (50.6% true)
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89 Model 13 [ 1 3 33513 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 3.67/3.89
% 3.67/3.89 Process 3620 finished Sun Jul 3 01:16:27 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------