TSTP Solution File: LCL209-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : LCL209-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 00:24:00 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP32422/LCL/LCL209-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ......... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 18] [nf = 0] [nu = 10] [ut = 12]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4279] [nf = 1] [nu = 2475] [ut = 1477]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 16535] [nf = 4] [nu = 12623] [ut = 2730]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 76 secs [nr = 40350523] [nf = 46] [nu = 40077803] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 65305981] [nf = 76594] [nu = 64536299] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 65395275] [nf = 76595] [nu = 64602274] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 65489657] [nf = 76602] [nu = 64673044] [ut = 32000]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 142248411
% resolvents: 142171547 factors: 76864
% Number of unit clauses generated: 138433317
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 97.32
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 6 [1] = 6 [2] = 1465 [3] = 1253
% [4] = 29270
% Total = 32000
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 138433317 [2] = 3491183 [3] = 323892 [4] = 19
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] axiom_1 (+)5 (-)11782
% [1] theorem_1 (+)20016 (-)197
% ------------------
% Total: (+)20021 (-)11979
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 32000
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 6593762
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 142248411
% Number of unification failures: 286937557
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 4002062
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 15412539
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 5139
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 19233892
% Max entries in substitution set: 15
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 35450
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 2785
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 113759781
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 63
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 12
% Number of states in UCFA table: 202774
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 830898
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 528000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.38
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.24
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 40
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 429185968
% ConstructUnitClause() = 67444
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.18 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 474161
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------