TSTP Solution File: LCL202-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL202-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:28:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 11.53s 11.70s
% Output : Refutation 11.53s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LCL202-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.13/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 3 13:46:30 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.19/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.19/0.35 Sun Jul 3 13:46:30 2022
% 0.19/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 24470.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.19/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.19/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.19/0.35 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.19/0.35 in usable.
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.19/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.19/0.35
% 0.19/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 4
% 0.19/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.19/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 44
% 0.19/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.19/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 6
% 0.19/0.39 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.19/0.39 distinct function count: 2
% 0.19/0.39 distinct constant count: 2
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Model 4 [ 1 9 94448 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Model 5 [ 1 2 9996 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Model 6 [ 2 0 754 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Model 7 [ 2 2 12371 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Model 8 [ 3 0 702 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Model 9 [ 3 2 7850 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Model 10 [ 3 5 13558 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 11.32 sec ----> 248 [binary,247.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Length of proof is 7. Level of proof is 7.
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 11.53/11.70 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 11.53/11.70 % SZS output start Refutation
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 1 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(A).
% 11.53/11.70 2 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(or(not(B),A))| -theorem(B).
% 11.53/11.70 3 [] {+} theorem(or(not(A),B))| -axiom(or(not(A),C))| -theorem(or(not(C),B)).
% 11.53/11.70 4 [] {+} -theorem(or(not(not(or(p,q))),or(p,not(q)))).
% 11.53/11.70 5 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(A,A)),A)).
% 11.53/11.70 6 [] {+} axiom(or(not(A),or(B,A))).
% 11.53/11.70 7 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))).
% 11.53/11.70 8 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 11.53/11.70 10 [hyper,5,1] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,A)),A)).
% 11.53/11.70 30 [hyper,10,3,6] {+} theorem(or(not(A),A)).
% 11.53/11.70 36 [hyper,30,2,7] {+} theorem(or(A,not(A))).
% 11.53/11.70 56 [hyper,36,3,6] {-} theorem(or(not(A),not(not(or(B,A))))).
% 11.53/11.70 163 [hyper,56,2,7] {-} theorem(or(not(not(or(A,B))),not(B))).
% 11.53/11.70 167 [hyper,163,2,6] {-} theorem(or(A,or(not(not(or(B,C))),not(C)))).
% 11.53/11.70 247 [hyper,167,2,8] {-} theorem(or(not(not(or(A,B))),or(C,not(B)))).
% 11.53/11.70 248 [binary,247.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 % SZS output end Refutation
% 11.53/11.70 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 ============ end of search ============
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 true clauses given 15 (27.8%)
% 11.53/11.70 false clauses given 39
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 FALSE TRUE
% 11.53/11.70 9 0 22
% 11.53/11.70 11 11 34
% 11.53/11.70 12 0 1
% 11.53/11.70 13 18 26
% 11.53/11.70 14 0 4
% 11.53/11.70 15 13 15
% 11.53/11.70 16 0 1
% 11.53/11.70 17 10 4
% 11.53/11.70 19 8 2
% 11.53/11.70 21 4 2
% 11.53/11.70 22 0 1
% 11.53/11.70 27 0 1
% 11.53/11.70 tot: 64 113 (63.8% true)
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Model 10 [ 3 5 13558 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 11.53/11.70
% 11.53/11.70 Process 24470 finished Sun Jul 3 13:46:41 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------