TSTP Solution File: LCL199-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : LCL199-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:28:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.68s 0.87s
% Output   : Refutation 0.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : LCL199-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Jul  2 21:59:23 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.37  The process was started by sandbox on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.37  Sat Jul  2 21:59:23 2022
% 0.14/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 1489.
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  list(usable).
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.14/0.37  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.14/0.37  in usable.
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.37     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.37  
% 0.14/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.41  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.41  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.41  number of clauses in intial UL: 4
% 0.20/0.41  number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.20/0.41  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 44
% 0.20/0.41  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.20/0.41  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.41  absolute distinct symbol count: 6
% 0.20/0.41     distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.20/0.41     distinct function count: 2
% 0.20/0.41     distinct constant count: 2
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.68/0.87  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.68/0.87  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  Model 5 [ 1 28 196360 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.47 sec ----> 81 [binary,80.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  Length of proof is 6.  Level of proof is 6.
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.68/0.87  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.68/0.87  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  1 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(A).
% 0.68/0.87  2 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(or(not(B),A))| -theorem(B).
% 0.68/0.87  3 [] {+} theorem(or(not(A),B))| -axiom(or(not(A),C))| -theorem(or(not(C),B)).
% 0.68/0.87  4 [] {+} -theorem(or(not(not(or(p,q))),not(p))).
% 0.68/0.87  5 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(A,A)),A)).
% 0.68/0.87  6 [] {+} axiom(or(not(A),or(B,A))).
% 0.68/0.87  7 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))).
% 0.68/0.87  10 [hyper,5,1] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,A)),A)).
% 0.68/0.87  35 [hyper,10,3,6] {+} theorem(or(not(A),A)).
% 0.68/0.87  42 [hyper,35,2,7] {+} theorem(or(A,not(A))).
% 0.68/0.87  54 [hyper,42,3,7] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),not(not(or(B,A))))).
% 0.68/0.87  69 [hyper,54,3,6] {-} theorem(or(not(A),not(not(or(A,B))))).
% 0.68/0.87  80 [hyper,69,2,7] {-} theorem(or(not(not(or(A,B))),not(A))).
% 0.68/0.87  81 [binary,80.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.68/0.87  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  ============ end of search ============
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  true clauses given           5      (33.3%)
% 0.68/0.87  false clauses given         10
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.68/0.87     7  0         5
% 0.68/0.87     9  0         14
% 0.68/0.87    11  1         10
% 0.68/0.87    13  2         7
% 0.68/0.87    15  4         4
% 0.68/0.87    17  2         3
% 0.68/0.87    19  0         1
% 0.68/0.87  tot:  9         44      (83.0% true)
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  Model 5 [ 1 28 196360 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.68/0.87  
% 0.68/0.87  Process 1489 finished Sat Jul  2 21:59:23 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------