TSTP Solution File: LCL198-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : LCL198-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:28:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 12.63s 12.82s
% Output   : Refutation 12.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : LCL198-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul  4 02:11:15 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36  Mon Jul  4 02:11:15 2022
% 0.13/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 22389.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.13/0.36  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.13/0.36  in usable.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.21/0.40  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.21/0.40  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.21/0.40  number of clauses in intial UL: 4
% 0.21/0.40  number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.21/0.40  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 44
% 0.21/0.40  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.21/0.40  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.21/0.40  absolute distinct symbol count: 6
% 0.21/0.40     distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.21/0.40     distinct function count: 2
% 0.21/0.40     distinct constant count: 2
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.21/0.40  
% 0.21/0.40  =========== start of search ===========
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Changing weight limit from 60 to 57.
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Model 3 [ 1 1 438 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Model 4 [ 1 1 13902 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Model 5 [ 1 2 15302 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Model 6 [ 2 3 35705 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Model 7 [ 2 4 47509 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Model 8 [ 2 0 530 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Model 9 [ 2 23 146153 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Model 10 [ 2 2 15589 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.58  Resetting weight limit to 57 after 1245 givens.
% 11.42/11.58  
% 11.42/11.59  
% 11.42/11.59  
% 11.42/11.59  Changing weight limit from 57 to 49.
% 11.42/11.59  
% 11.42/11.59  Resetting weight limit to 49 after 1250 givens.
% 11.42/11.59  
% 11.42/11.59  
% 11.42/11.59  
% 11.42/11.59  Changing weight limit from 49 to 47.
% 11.42/11.59  
% 11.42/11.59  Resetting weight limit to 47 after 1265 givens.
% 11.42/11.59  
% 11.42/11.59  
% 11.42/11.59  
% 11.42/11.59  Changing weight limit from 47 to 45.
% 11.42/11.59  
% 11.42/11.59  Resetting weight limit to 45 after 1275 givens.
% 11.42/11.59  
% 11.42/11.60  
% 11.42/11.60  
% 11.42/11.60  Changing weight limit from 45 to 44.
% 11.42/11.60  
% 11.42/11.60  Resetting weight limit to 44 after 1285 givens.
% 11.42/11.60  
% 11.42/11.60  
% 11.42/11.60  
% 11.42/11.60  Changing weight limit from 44 to 42.
% 11.42/11.60  
% 11.42/11.60  Resetting weight limit to 42 after 1290 givens.
% 11.42/11.60  
% 11.42/11.60  
% 11.42/11.60  
% 11.42/11.60  Changing weight limit from 42 to 41.
% 11.42/11.60  
% 11.42/11.60  Resetting weight limit to 41 after 1295 givens.
% 11.42/11.60  
% 11.42/11.60  
% 11.42/11.60  
% 11.42/11.60  Changing weight limit from 41 to 39.
% 11.42/11.60  
% 11.42/11.60  Resetting weight limit to 39 after 1300 givens.
% 11.42/11.60  
% 11.42/11.61  
% 11.42/11.61  
% 11.42/11.61  Changing weight limit from 39 to 37.
% 11.42/11.61  
% 11.42/11.61  Resetting weight limit to 37 after 1305 givens.
% 11.42/11.61  
% 11.42/11.61  
% 11.42/11.61  
% 11.42/11.61  Changing weight limit from 37 to 36.
% 11.42/11.61  
% 11.42/11.61  Resetting weight limit to 36 after 1315 givens.
% 11.42/11.61  
% 11.42/11.61  
% 11.42/11.61  
% 11.42/11.61  Changing weight limit from 36 to 35.
% 11.42/11.61  
% 11.42/11.61  Resetting weight limit to 35 after 1320 givens.
% 11.42/11.61  
% 11.42/11.62  
% 11.42/11.62  
% 11.42/11.62  Changing weight limit from 35 to 34.
% 11.42/11.62  
% 11.42/11.62  Resetting weight limit to 34 after 1330 givens.
% 11.42/11.62  
% 11.42/11.62  
% 11.42/11.62  
% 11.42/11.62  Changing weight limit from 34 to 33.
% 11.42/11.62  
% 11.42/11.62  Resetting weight limit to 33 after 1335 givens.
% 11.42/11.62  
% 11.42/11.63  
% 11.42/11.63  
% 11.42/11.63  Changing weight limit from 33 to 32.
% 11.42/11.63  
% 11.42/11.63  Resetting weight limit to 32 after 1355 givens.
% 11.42/11.63  
% 11.42/11.64  
% 11.42/11.64  
% 11.42/11.64  Changing weight limit from 32 to 31.
% 11.42/11.64  
% 11.42/11.64  Resetting weight limit to 31 after 1365 givens.
% 11.42/11.64  
% 11.48/11.64  
% 11.48/11.64  
% 11.48/11.64  Changing weight limit from 31 to 30.
% 11.48/11.64  
% 11.48/11.64  Resetting weight limit to 30 after 1385 givens.
% 11.48/11.64  
% 11.48/11.65  
% 11.48/11.65  
% 11.48/11.65  Changing weight limit from 30 to 29.
% 11.48/11.65  
% 11.48/11.65  Resetting weight limit to 29 after 1400 givens.
% 11.48/11.65  
% 11.50/11.66  
% 11.50/11.66  
% 11.50/11.66  Changing weight limit from 29 to 28.
% 11.50/11.66  
% 11.50/11.66  Resetting weight limit to 28 after 1415 givens.
% 11.50/11.66  
% 11.50/11.67  
% 11.50/11.67  
% 11.50/11.67  Changing weight limit from 28 to 27.
% 11.50/11.67  
% 11.50/11.67  Resetting weight limit to 27 after 1440 givens.
% 11.50/11.67  
% 11.50/11.68  
% 11.50/11.68  
% 11.50/11.68  Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 11.50/11.68  
% 11.50/11.68  Resetting weight limit to 26 after 1465 givens.
% 11.50/11.68  
% 11.50/11.69  
% 11.50/11.69  
% 11.50/11.69  Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 11.50/11.69  
% 11.50/11.69  Resetting weight limit to 25 after 1485 givens.
% 11.50/11.69  
% 12.29/12.48  
% 12.29/12.48  
% 12.29/12.48  Changing weight limit from 25 to 23.
% 12.29/12.48  
% 12.29/12.48  Resetting weight limit to 23 after 3450 givens.
% 12.29/12.48  
% 12.45/12.63  
% 12.45/12.63  
% 12.45/12.63  Changing weight limit from 23 to 21.
% 12.45/12.63  
% 12.45/12.63  Resetting weight limit to 21 after 3830 givens.
% 12.45/12.63  
% 12.63/12.82  
% 12.63/12.82  -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! -- 
% 12.63/12.82  
% 12.63/12.82  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at  12.39 sec ----> 17158 [binary,17157.1,4.1] {+} $F.
% 12.63/12.82  
% 12.63/12.82  Length of proof is 14.  Level of proof is 14.
% 12.63/12.82  
% 12.63/12.82  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 12.63/12.82  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 12.63/12.82  % SZS output start Refutation
% 12.63/12.82  
% 12.63/12.82  1 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(A).
% 12.63/12.82  2 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(or(not(B),A))| -theorem(B).
% 12.63/12.82  3 [] {+} theorem(or(not(A),B))| -axiom(or(not(A),C))| -theorem(or(not(C),B)).
% 12.63/12.82  4 [] {+} -theorem(or(not(or(not(p),or(not(p),q))),or(not(p),q))).
% 12.63/12.82  5 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(A,A)),A)).
% 12.63/12.82  6 [] {+} axiom(or(not(A),or(B,A))).
% 12.63/12.82  7 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))).
% 12.63/12.82  8 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 12.63/12.82  9 [] {+} axiom(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))).
% 12.63/12.82  10 [hyper,5,1] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,A)),A)).
% 12.63/12.82  12 [hyper,10,3,6] {+} theorem(or(not(A),A)).
% 12.63/12.82  19 [hyper,7,3,12] {+} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))).
% 12.63/12.82  122 [hyper,19,3,6] {+} theorem(or(not(A),or(A,B))).
% 12.63/12.82  150 [hyper,122,3,5] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,A)),or(A,B))).
% 12.63/12.82  157 [hyper,150,2,9] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,B))),or(A,or(B,C)))).
% 12.63/12.82  876 [hyper,157,2,8] {-} theorem(or(A,or(not(or(A,or(B,B))),or(B,C)))).
% 12.63/12.82  2115 [hyper,876,2,7] {-} theorem(or(or(not(or(A,or(B,B))),or(B,C)),A)).
% 12.63/12.82  3637 [hyper,2115,2,6] {-} theorem(or(A,or(or(not(or(B,or(C,C))),or(C,D)),B))).
% 12.63/12.82  9519 [hyper,3637,2,8] {-} theorem(or(or(not(or(A,or(B,B))),or(B,C)),or(D,A))).
% 12.63/12.82  17141 [hyper,9519,2,5] {-} theorem(or(not(or(or(A,B),or(A,A))),or(A,B))).
% 12.63/12.82  17142 [hyper,17141,3,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(or(A,B),A))),or(A,B))).
% 12.63/12.82  17150 [hyper,17142,3,6] {-} theorem(or(not(or(or(A,B),A)),or(A,B))).
% 12.63/12.82  17157 [hyper,17150,3,7] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(A,B))),or(A,B))).
% 12.63/12.82  17158 [binary,17157.1,4.1] {+} $F.
% 12.63/12.82  
% 12.63/12.82  % SZS output end Refutation
% 12.63/12.82  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 12.63/12.82  
% 12.63/12.82  
% 12.63/12.82  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 12.63/12.82  
% 12.63/12.82  
% 12.63/12.82  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 12.63/12.82  
% 12.63/12.82  ============ end of search ============
% 12.63/12.82  
% 12.63/12.82  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 12.63/12.82  
% 12.63/12.82  true clauses given        1317      (28.7%)
% 12.63/12.82  false clauses given       3278
% 12.63/12.82  
% 12.63/12.82        FALSE     TRUE
% 12.63/12.82    13  6         387
% 12.63/12.82    14  0         4
% 12.63/12.82    15  1343      863
% 12.63/12.82    16  112       4
% 12.63/12.82    17  1039      568
% 12.63/12.82    18  0         2
% 12.63/12.82    19  0         562
% 12.63/12.82    20  0         2
% 12.63/12.82    21  0         108
% 12.63/12.82  tot:  2500      2500      (50.0% true)
% 12.63/12.82  
% 12.63/12.82  
% 12.63/12.82  Model 10 [ 2 -110 15589 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 12.63/12.82  
% 12.63/12.82  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 12.63/12.82  
% 12.63/12.82  Process 22389 finished Mon Jul  4 02:11:27 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------