TSTP Solution File: LCL192-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : LCL192-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:28:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.70s 3.91s
% Output   : Refutation 3.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : LCL192-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul  4 16:24:29 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.35  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35  The process was started by sandbox on n020.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35  Mon Jul  4 16:24:29 2022
% 0.12/0.35  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 24332.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  This is a Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 0.12/0.35  be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.12/0.35  in usable.
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35     dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35  
% 0.12/0.35  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.38  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.38  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.38  number of clauses in intial UL: 4
% 0.18/0.38  number of clauses initially in problem: 9
% 0.18/0.38  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 44
% 0.18/0.38  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.18/0.38  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.38  absolute distinct symbol count: 7
% 0.18/0.38     distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.18/0.38     distinct function count: 2
% 0.18/0.38     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  =========== start of search ===========
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 3.70/3.91  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.70/3.91  % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   3.53 sec ----> 1382 [binary,1381.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 4.
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 3.70/3.91  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 3.70/3.91  % SZS output start Refutation
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  1 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(A).
% 3.70/3.91  2 [] {+} theorem(A)| -axiom(or(not(B),A))| -theorem(B).
% 3.70/3.91  3 [] {+} theorem(or(not(A),B))| -axiom(or(not(A),C))| -theorem(or(not(C),B)).
% 3.70/3.91  4 [] {+} -theorem(or(not(or(or(p,q),r)),or(p,or(q,r)))).
% 3.70/3.91  7 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))).
% 3.70/3.91  8 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(A,C)))).
% 3.70/3.91  9 [] {-} axiom(or(not(or(not(A),B)),or(not(or(C,A)),or(C,B)))).
% 3.70/3.91  17 [hyper,7,1] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,B)),or(B,A))).
% 3.70/3.91  47 [hyper,9,2,17] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(A,or(C,B)))).
% 3.70/3.91  559 [hyper,47,3,8] {-} theorem(or(not(or(A,or(B,C))),or(B,or(C,A)))).
% 3.70/3.91  1381 [hyper,559,3,7] {-} theorem(or(not(or(or(A,B),C)),or(A,or(B,C)))).
% 3.70/3.91  1382 [binary,1381.1,4.1] {-} $F.
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  % SZS output end Refutation
% 3.70/3.91  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  ============ end of search ============
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  true clauses given          80      (27.2%)
% 3.70/3.91  false clauses given        214
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91        FALSE     TRUE
% 3.70/3.91     9  0         14
% 3.70/3.91    11  0         89
% 3.70/3.91    12  0         2
% 3.70/3.91    13  161       43
% 3.70/3.91    14  0         6
% 3.70/3.91    15  211       28
% 3.70/3.91    16  6         5
% 3.70/3.91    17  144       12
% 3.70/3.91    18  12        3
% 3.70/3.91    19  74        8
% 3.70/3.91    20  15        2
% 3.70/3.91    21  62        2
% 3.70/3.91    22  9         1
% 3.70/3.91    23  31        0
% 3.70/3.91    24  6         0
% 3.70/3.91    25  11        0
% 3.70/3.91    26  8         0
% 3.70/3.91    27  3         1
% 3.70/3.91    28  4         0
% 3.70/3.91    29  4         0
% 3.70/3.91    31  5         0
% 3.70/3.91    32  1         0
% 3.70/3.91    33  4         0
% 3.70/3.91    35  1         0
% 3.70/3.91    36  2         0
% 3.70/3.91    37  1         0
% 3.70/3.91    39  1         0
% 3.70/3.91    47  2         0
% 3.70/3.91  tot:  778       216      (21.7% true)
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 3.70/3.91  
% 3.70/3.91  Process 24332 finished Mon Jul  4 16:24:33 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------