TSTP Solution File: LCL186-10 by Toma---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Toma---0.4
% Problem  : LCL186-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : toma --casc %s

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:14:06 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.67s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : LCL186-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : toma --casc %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Aug 25 04:27:38 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.67  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.67  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.67  original problem:
% 0.19/0.67  axioms:
% 0.19/0.67  ifeq(A, A, B, C) = B
% 0.19/0.67  axiom(or(not(or(A, A)), A)) = true()
% 0.19/0.67  axiom(or(not(A), or(B, A))) = true()
% 0.19/0.67  axiom(or(not(or(A, B)), or(B, A))) = true()
% 0.19/0.67  axiom(or(not(or(A, or(B, C))), or(B, or(A, C)))) = true()
% 0.19/0.67  axiom(or(not(or(not(A), B)), or(not(or(C, A)), or(C, B)))) = true()
% 0.19/0.67  ifeq(axiom(X), true(), theorem(X), true()) = true()
% 0.19/0.67  ifeq(theorem(Y), true(), ifeq(axiom(or(not(Y), X)), true(), theorem(X), true()), true()) = true()
% 0.19/0.67  ifeq(theorem(or(not(Y), Z)), true(), ifeq(axiom(or(not(X), Y)), true(), theorem(or(not(X), Z)), true()), true()) = true()
% 0.19/0.67  goal:
% 0.19/0.67  theorem(or(not(not(p())), or(not(p()), q()))) != true()
% 0.19/0.67  To show the unsatisfiability of the original goal,
% 0.19/0.67  it suffices to show that theorem(or(not(not(p())), or(not(p()), q()))) = true() (skolemized goal) is valid under the axioms.
% 0.19/0.67  Here is an equational proof:
% 0.19/0.67  0: ifeq(X0, X0, X1, X2) = X1.
% 0.19/0.67  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.19/0.67  
% 0.19/0.67  2: axiom(or(not(X0), or(X1, X0))) = true().
% 0.19/0.67  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.19/0.67  
% 0.19/0.67  3: axiom(or(not(or(X0, X1)), or(X1, X0))) = true().
% 0.19/0.67  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.19/0.67  
% 0.19/0.67  6: ifeq(axiom(X3), true(), theorem(X3), true()) = true().
% 0.19/0.67  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.19/0.67  
% 0.19/0.67  8: ifeq(theorem(or(not(X4), X5)), true(), ifeq(axiom(or(not(X3), X4)), true(), theorem(or(not(X3), X5)), true()), true()) = true().
% 0.19/0.67  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.19/0.67  
% 0.19/0.67  12: true() = ifeq(true(), true(), theorem(or(not(or(X4, X5)), or(X5, X4))), true()).
% 0.19/0.67  Proof: A critical pair between equations 6 and 3.
% 0.19/0.67  
% 0.19/0.67  20: true() = ifeq(theorem(or(not(or(X7, X6)), X5)), true(), ifeq(true(), true(), theorem(or(not(X6), X5)), true()), true()).
% 0.19/0.67  Proof: A critical pair between equations 8 and 2.
% 0.19/0.67  
% 0.19/0.67  21: true() = ifeq(theorem(or(not(or(X7, X6)), X5)), true(), theorem(or(not(X6), X5)), true()).
% 0.19/0.67  Proof: Rewrite equation 20,
% 0.19/0.67                 lhs with equations []
% 0.19/0.67                 rhs with equations [0].
% 0.19/0.67  
% 0.19/0.67  29: true() = theorem(or(not(or(X4, X5)), or(X5, X4))).
% 0.19/0.67  Proof: Rewrite equation 12,
% 0.19/0.67                 lhs with equations []
% 0.19/0.67                 rhs with equations [0].
% 0.19/0.67  
% 0.19/0.67  36: true() = ifeq(true(), true(), theorem(or(not(X9), or(X9, X8))), true()).
% 0.19/0.67  Proof: A critical pair between equations 21 and 29.
% 0.19/0.67  
% 0.19/0.67  47: true() = theorem(or(not(X9), or(X9, X8))).
% 0.19/0.67  Proof: Rewrite equation 36,
% 0.19/0.67                 lhs with equations []
% 0.19/0.67                 rhs with equations [0].
% 0.19/0.67  
% 0.19/0.67  49: theorem(or(not(not(p())), or(not(p()), q()))) = true().
% 0.19/0.67  Proof: Rewrite lhs with equations [47]
% 0.19/0.67                 rhs with equations [].
% 0.19/0.67  
% 0.19/0.67  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------