TSTP Solution File: LCL186-10 by Matita---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Matita---1.0
% Problem : LCL186-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : matitaprover --timeout %d --tptppath /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 12:43:01 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LCL186-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : matitaprover --timeout %d --tptppath /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 03:58:01 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.34 3262: Facts:
% 0.19/0.34 3262: Id : 2, {_}: ifeq ?2 ?2 ?3 ?4 =>= ?3 [4, 3, 2] by ifeq_axiom ?2 ?3 ?4
% 0.19/0.34 3262: Id : 3, {_}: axiomP (or (not (or ?6 ?6)) ?6) =>= true [6] by axiom_1_2 ?6
% 0.19/0.34 3262: Id : 4, {_}:
% 0.19/0.34 axiomP (or (not ?8) (or ?9 ?8)) =>= true
% 0.19/0.34 [9, 8] by axiom_1_3 ?8 ?9
% 0.19/0.34 3262: Id : 5, {_}:
% 0.19/0.34 axiomP (or (not (or ?11 ?12)) (or ?12 ?11)) =>= true
% 0.19/0.34 [12, 11] by axiom_1_4 ?11 ?12
% 0.19/0.34 3262: Id : 6, {_}:
% 0.19/0.34 axiomP (or (not (or ?14 (or ?15 ?16))) (or ?15 (or ?14 ?16)))
% 0.19/0.34 =>=
% 0.19/0.34 true
% 0.19/0.34 [16, 15, 14] by axiom_1_5 ?14 ?15 ?16
% 0.19/0.34 3262: Id : 7, {_}:
% 0.19/0.34 axiomP
% 0.19/0.34 (or (not (or (not ?18) ?19)) (or (not (or ?20 ?18)) (or ?20 ?19)))
% 0.19/0.34 =>=
% 0.19/0.34 true
% 0.19/0.34 [20, 19, 18] by axiom_1_6 ?18 ?19 ?20
% 0.19/0.34 3262: Id : 8, {_}:
% 0.19/0.34 ifeq (axiomP ?22) true (theoremP ?22) true =>= true
% 0.19/0.34 [22] by rule_1 ?22
% 0.19/0.34 3262: Id : 9, {_}:
% 0.19/0.34 ifeq (theoremP ?24) true
% 0.19/0.34 (ifeq (axiomP (or (not ?24) ?25)) true (theoremP ?25) true) true
% 0.19/0.34 =>=
% 0.19/0.34 true
% 0.19/0.34 [25, 24] by rule_2 ?24 ?25
% 0.19/0.34 3262: Id : 10, {_}:
% 0.19/0.34 ifeq (theoremP (or (not ?27) ?28)) true
% 0.19/0.34 (ifeq (axiomP (or (not ?29) ?27)) true
% 0.19/0.34 (theoremP (or (not ?29) ?28)) true) true
% 0.19/0.34 =>=
% 0.19/0.34 true
% 0.19/0.34 [29, 28, 27] by rule_3 ?27 ?28 ?29
% 0.19/0.34 3262: Goal:
% 0.19/0.34 3262: Id : 1, {_}:
% 0.19/0.34 theoremP (or (not (not p)) (or (not p) q)) =>= true
% 0.19/0.34 [] by prove_this
% 0.19/0.41 Statistics :
% 0.19/0.41 Max weight : 27
% 0.19/0.41 Found proof, 0.073316s
% 0.19/0.41 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.41 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.41 Id : 5, {_}: axiomP (or (not (or ?11 ?12)) (or ?12 ?11)) =>= true [12, 11] by axiom_1_4 ?11 ?12
% 0.19/0.41 Id : 25, {_}: ifeq (axiomP ?60) true (theoremP ?60) true =>= true [60] by rule_1 ?60
% 0.19/0.41 Id : 2, {_}: ifeq ?2 ?2 ?3 ?4 =>= ?3 [4, 3, 2] by ifeq_axiom ?2 ?3 ?4
% 0.19/0.41 Id : 4, {_}: axiomP (or (not ?8) (or ?9 ?8)) =>= true [9, 8] by axiom_1_3 ?8 ?9
% 0.19/0.41 Id : 49, {_}: ifeq (theoremP (or (not ?99) ?100)) true (ifeq (axiomP (or (not ?101) ?99)) true (theoremP (or (not ?101) ?100)) true) true =>= true [101, 100, 99] by rule_3 ?99 ?100 ?101
% 0.19/0.41 Id : 51, {_}: ifeq (theoremP (or (not (or ?106 ?107)) ?108)) true (ifeq true true (theoremP (or (not ?107) ?108)) true) true =>= true [108, 107, 106] by Super 49 with 4 at 1,3,2
% 0.19/0.41 Id : 2179, {_}: ifeq (theoremP (or (not (or ?3069 ?3070)) ?3071)) true (theoremP (or (not ?3070) ?3071)) true =>= true [3071, 3070, 3069] by Demod 51 with 2 at 3,2
% 0.19/0.41 Id : 28, {_}: ifeq true true (theoremP (or (not (or ?67 ?68)) (or ?68 ?67))) true =>= true [68, 67] by Super 25 with 5 at 1,2
% 0.19/0.41 Id : 34, {_}: theoremP (or (not (or ?67 ?68)) (or ?68 ?67)) =>= true [68, 67] by Demod 28 with 2 at 2
% 0.19/0.41 Id : 2210, {_}: ifeq true true (theoremP (or (not ?3196) (or ?3196 ?3197))) true =>= true [3197, 3196] by Super 2179 with 34 at 1,2
% 0.19/0.41 Id : 2268, {_}: theoremP (or (not ?3196) (or ?3196 ?3197)) =>= true [3197, 3196] by Demod 2210 with 2 at 2
% 0.19/0.41 Id : 2383, {_}: true === true [] by Demod 1 with 2268 at 2
% 0.19/0.41 Id : 1, {_}: theoremP (or (not (not p)) (or (not p) q)) =>= true [] by prove_this
% 0.19/0.41 % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.41 3264: solved /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p in 0.074462 using lpo
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------