TSTP Solution File: LCL172-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : LCL172-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 08:17:59 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(or(not(or(not(p),or(not(q),r))),or(not(q),or(not(p),r)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.psfPJUYUAV/E---3.1_1932.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(rule_1,axiom,
    ( theorem(X1)
    | ~ axiom(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.psfPJUYUAV/E---3.1_1932.p',rule_1) ).

cnf(axiom_1_5,axiom,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.psfPJUYUAV/E---3.1_1932.p',axiom_1_5) ).

cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(or(not(or(not(p),or(not(q),r))),or(not(q),or(not(p),r)))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    ( theorem(X1)
    | ~ axiom(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(or(not(or(not(p),or(not(q),r))),or(not(q),or(not(p),r)))),
    c_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( theorem(X1)
    | ~ axiom(X1) ),
    c_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    axiom(or(not(or(X1,or(X2,X3))),or(X2,or(X1,X3)))),
    axiom_1_5 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem    : LCL172-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 08:32:06 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.psfPJUYUAV/E---3.1_1932.p
% 0.20/0.50  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # new_bool_1 with pid 2033 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50  # Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G----_Z1410__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # G----_Z1410__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with pid 2042 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Result found by G----_Z1410__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.50  # Search class: FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.50  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.50  # Starting G----_Z1410__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.50  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 0.20/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 9
% 0.20/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
% 0.20/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 18
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 18
% 0.20/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 11
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10
% 0.20/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 11
% 0.20/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.20/0.50  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 9
% 0.20/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.20/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.20/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10
% 0.20/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 20
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 9
% 0.20/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10
% 0.20/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 0.20/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 12
% 0.20/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 509
% 0.20/0.50  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 17
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  # User time                : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.50  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1608 pages
% 0.20/0.50  
% 0.20/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.50  # User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.50  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1700 pages
% 0.20/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.50  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------