TSTP Solution File: LCL169-3 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : LCL169-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:55:44 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   16 (   2 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(rule_1,axiom,
    ( theorem(X1)
    | ~ axiom(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',rule_1) ).

cnf(axiom_1_2,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X1),X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',axiom_1_2) ).

cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(implies(implies(p,not(p)),not(p))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_this) ).

cnf(implies_definition,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/LCL004-0.ax',implies_definition) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    ( theorem(X1)
    | ~ axiom(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( theorem(X1)
    | ~ axiom(X1) ),
    c_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    axiom(implies(or(X1,X1),X1)),
    axiom_1_2 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(implies(implies(p,not(p)),not(p))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_this]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    theorem(implies(or(X1,X1),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    implies(X1,X2) = or(not(X1),X2),
    implies_definition ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ theorem(implies(implies(p,not(p)),not(p))),
    c_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    theorem(implies(implies(X1,not(X1)),not(X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem    : LCL169-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon May 20 02:40:52 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.46  Running first-order model finding
% 0.18/0.46  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.47  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.18/0.47  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # new_bool_1 with pid 19924 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.18/0.47  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.47  # Search class: FHUSM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.47  # Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 28s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 19931 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Result found by G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.18/0.47  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.47  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.47  # Search class: FHUSM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.47  # Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.47  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 28s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.47  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.47  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  # Proof found!
% 0.18/0.47  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.47  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.47  # Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 0.18/0.47  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Initial clauses                      : 9
% 0.18/0.47  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
% 0.18/0.47  # Processed clauses                    : 35
% 0.18/0.47  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.18/0.47  # ...remaining for further processing  : 33
% 0.18/0.47  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.18/0.47  # Generated clauses                    : 37
% 0.18/0.47  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 31
% 0.18/0.47  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Paramodulations                      : 37
% 0.18/0.47  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Total rewrite steps                  : 8
% 0.18/0.47  # ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.18/0.47  # Current number of processed clauses  : 23
% 0.18/0.47  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 13
% 0.18/0.47  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.47  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.18/0.47  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 9
% 0.18/0.47  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14
% 0.18/0.47  # ...number of literals in the above   : 15
% 0.18/0.47  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Current number of archived clauses   : 10
% 0.18/0.47  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19
% 0.18/0.47  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.18/0.47  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.18/0.47  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.18/0.47  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.18/0.47  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.18/0.47  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.18/0.47  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 663
% 0.18/0.47  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 11
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.47  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.18/0.47  # Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.18/0.47  # Maximum resident set size: 1620 pages
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.47  # User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.18/0.47  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.47  # Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.18/0.47  # Maximum resident set size: 1712 pages
% 0.18/0.47  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------