TSTP Solution File: LCL145-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : LCL145-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 08:17:52 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   38 (  38 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   38 (  37 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(wajsberg_2,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.GXqCmVfyt4/E---3.1_29158.p',wajsberg_2) ).

cnf(wajsberg_1,axiom,
    implies(truth,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.GXqCmVfyt4/E---3.1_29158.p',wajsberg_1) ).

cnf(wajsberg_3,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),X2) = implies(implies(X2,X1),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.GXqCmVfyt4/E---3.1_29158.p',wajsberg_3) ).

cnf(wajsberg_4,axiom,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.GXqCmVfyt4/E---3.1_29158.p',wajsberg_4) ).

cnf(prove_wajsberg_theorem,negated_conjecture,
    not(big_V(x,y)) != big_hat(not(x),not(y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.GXqCmVfyt4/E---3.1_29158.p',prove_wajsberg_theorem) ).

cnf(big_hat_definition,axiom,
    big_hat(X1,X2) = not(big_V(not(X1),not(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.GXqCmVfyt4/E---3.1_29158.p',big_hat_definition) ).

cnf(big_V_definition,axiom,
    big_V(X1,X2) = implies(implies(X1,X2),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.GXqCmVfyt4/E---3.1_29158.p',big_V_definition) ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3))) = truth,
    wajsberg_2 ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    implies(truth,X1) = X1,
    wajsberg_1 ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    implies(implies(X1,X2),X2) = implies(implies(X2,X1),X1),
    wajsberg_3 ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,truth),truth) = implies(X1,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    implies(X1,X1) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_10]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,truth),truth) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    implies(X1,truth) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_14]),c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2),X2) = implies(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_15]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),implies(X2,X1)) = truth,
    wajsberg_4 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X2),X1) = implies(X2,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(truth)),X1) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    implies(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3),implies(X2,X3)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_15]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    implies(not(truth),not(not(truth))) = not(not(truth)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    implies(not(truth),X1) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_19]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    implies(implies(not(X1),not(implies(X2,X1))),implies(implies(X1,X2),X2)) = truth,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    not(not(truth)) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    implies(not(implies(X1,not(truth))),X1) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_8]),c_0_22]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    implies(X1,implies(not(X1),not(truth))) = truth,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_25]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    not(big_V(x,y)) != big_hat(not(x),not(y)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_wajsberg_theorem]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    big_hat(X1,X2) = not(big_V(not(X1),not(X2))),
    big_hat_definition ).

cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
    big_V(X1,X2) = implies(implies(X1,X2),X2),
    big_V_definition ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    implies(not(X1),not(truth)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_26]),c_0_8]),c_0_19]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    not(big_V(x,y)) != big_hat(not(x),not(y)),
    c_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    big_hat(X1,X2) = not(implies(implies(not(X1),not(X2)),not(X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    implies(implies(X1,not(truth)),not(truth)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_22]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    implies(X1,not(truth)) = not(X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_30]),c_0_22]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    not(implies(implies(x,y),y)) != not(implies(implies(not(not(x)),not(not(y))),not(not(y)))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_29]),c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    not(not(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_36])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10  % Problem    : LCL145-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.05/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 08:56:44 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.GXqCmVfyt4/E---3.1_29158.p
% 0.15/0.42  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 29236 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.42  # Search class: FHUSM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_092_C01_F1_AE_CS_SP_PS_CO_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2U with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 29241 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.42  # Result found by G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.42  # Search class: FHUSM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.42  # Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.42  # Starting G-E--_208_C12_11_nc_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.42  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.42  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.43  # Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 0.15/0.43  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Initial clauses                      : 9
% 0.15/0.43  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.15/0.43  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
% 0.15/0.43  # Processed clauses                    : 58
% 0.15/0.43  # ...of these trivial                  : 15
% 0.15/0.43  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # ...remaining for further processing  : 43
% 0.15/0.43  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Backward-rewritten                   : 15
% 0.15/0.43  # Generated clauses                    : 602
% 0.15/0.43  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 235
% 0.15/0.43  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Paramodulations                      : 602
% 0.15/0.43  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Total rewrite steps                  : 897
% 0.15/0.43  # ...of those cached                   : 679
% 0.15/0.43  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of processed clauses  : 21
% 0.15/0.43  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 17
% 0.15/0.43  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.15/0.43  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.15/0.43  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 180
% 0.15/0.43  # ...number of literals in the above   : 180
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of archived clauses   : 24
% 0.15/0.43  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.15/0.43  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 78
% 0.15/0.43  # BW rewrite match successes           : 23
% 0.15/0.43  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 5990
% 0.15/0.43  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 6
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43  # User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.43  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 1648 pages
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43  # User time                : 0.030 s
% 0.15/0.43  # System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Total time               : 0.041 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 0.15/0.43  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.15/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------