TSTP Solution File: LCL112-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : LCL112-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:36:53 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.50s 1.18s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.50s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 21 ( 11 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 34 ( 0 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 1 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 39 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| is_a_theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).
cnf(c_50,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mv_1) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X0,X2)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mv_2) ).
cnf(c_52,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),X1),implies(implies(X1,X0),X0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mv_3) ).
cnf(c_53,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X0),not(X1)),implies(X1,X0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mv_5) ).
cnf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,not(not(a)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_mv_29) ).
cnf(c_180,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X0)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_50]) ).
cnf(c_222,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(X0),not(X1)))
| is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X0)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_269,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(X0,X2))) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_278,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),X1))
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X0),X0)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_335,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
| is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X2)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_269,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_363,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),X1)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_278,c_180]) ).
cnf(c_403,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(not(X1),not(X2))))
| is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X2,X1))) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_335,c_53]) ).
cnf(c_406,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
| is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X2)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_335,c_363]) ).
cnf(c_720,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(not(X0),implies(X0,X1))),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_403,c_50]) ).
cnf(c_1029,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(X0)),implies(X1,X0))),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_720,c_403]) ).
cnf(c_1134,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(X1)),X1)) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1029,c_406]) ).
cnf(c_1219,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(X0)),X0)),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1134,c_50]) ).
cnf(c_1268,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X0,not(not(X0)))),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1219,c_222]) ).
cnf(c_1269,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(a,not(not(a)))),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_1268]) ).
cnf(c_1270,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1269,c_54]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : LCL112-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 2 19:00:50 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.50/1.18 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/1.18 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18 ------ iProver source info
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.50/1.18 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.50/1.18 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18 ------ Parsing...successful
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 0.50/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 0.50/1.18 ------ Problem Properties
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18 clauses 6
% 0.50/1.18 conjectures 1
% 0.50/1.18 EPR 0
% 0.50/1.18 Horn 6
% 0.50/1.18 unary 5
% 0.50/1.18 binary 0
% 0.50/1.18 lits 8
% 0.50/1.18 lits eq 0
% 0.50/1.18 fd_pure 0
% 0.50/1.18 fd_pseudo 0
% 0.50/1.18 fd_cond 0
% 0.50/1.18 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 0.50/1.18 AC symbols 0
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18 ------
% 0.50/1.18 Current options:
% 0.50/1.18 ------
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18 ------ Proving...
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.50/1.18
% 0.50/1.18
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------