TSTP Solution File: LCL111-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : LCL111-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RMC4vruoH2 true
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:58:14 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 16.95s 3.12s
% Output : Refutation 16.95s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : LCL111-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.RMC4vruoH2 true
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 05:59:40 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.65 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.65 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.65 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 16.95/3.12 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 16.95/3.12 % BCE start: 6
% 16.95/3.12 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 16.95/3.12 % PE start: 6
% 16.95/3.12 logic: neq
% 16.95/3.12 % PE eliminated: 0
% 16.95/3.12 % done 846 iterations in 2.367s
% 16.95/3.12 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 16.95/3.12 % SZS output start Refutation
% 16.95/3.12 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(implies_type, type, implies: $i > $i > $i).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(prove_mv_25, conjecture,
% 16.95/3.12 (is_a_theorem @
% 16.95/3.12 ( implies @
% 16.95/3.12 ( implies @ a @ b ) @
% 16.95/3.12 ( implies @ ( implies @ c @ a ) @ ( implies @ c @ b ) ) ))).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 16.95/3.12 (~( is_a_theorem @
% 16.95/3.12 ( implies @
% 16.95/3.12 ( implies @ a @ b ) @
% 16.95/3.12 ( implies @ ( implies @ c @ a ) @ ( implies @ c @ b ) ) ) )),
% 16.95/3.12 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_mv_25])).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 16.95/3.12 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 16.95/3.12 (implies @ (implies @ a @ b) @
% 16.95/3.12 (implies @ (implies @ c @ a) @ (implies @ c @ b))))),
% 16.95/3.12 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(mv_2, axiom,
% 16.95/3.12 (is_a_theorem @
% 16.95/3.12 ( implies @
% 16.95/3.12 ( implies @ X @ Y ) @
% 16.95/3.12 ( implies @ ( implies @ Y @ Z ) @ ( implies @ X @ Z ) ) ))).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 16.95/3.12 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.95/3.12 (is_a_theorem @
% 16.95/3.12 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @
% 16.95/3.12 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 16.95/3.12 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [mv_2])).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 16.95/3.12 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.95/3.12 (is_a_theorem @
% 16.95/3.12 (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @
% 16.95/3.12 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 16.95/3.12 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [mv_2])).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 16.95/3.12 (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) ) | ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) |
% 16.95/3.12 ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 16.95/3.12 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.95/3.12 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 16.95/3.12 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 16.95/3.12 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 16.95/3.12 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 16.95/3.12 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.95/3.12 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 16.95/3.12 | (is_a_theorem @
% 16.95/3.12 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 16.95/3.12 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(mv_3, axiom,
% 16.95/3.12 (is_a_theorem @
% 16.95/3.12 ( implies @
% 16.95/3.12 ( implies @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) @ Y ) @
% 16.95/3.12 ( implies @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) @ X ) ))).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 16.95/3.12 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.95/3.12 (is_a_theorem @
% 16.95/3.12 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X0 @ X1) @ X1) @
% 16.95/3.12 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X0)))),
% 16.95/3.12 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [mv_3])).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(mv_1, axiom, (is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ ( implies @ Y @ X ) ))).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 16.95/3.12 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.95/3.12 (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.95/3.12 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [mv_1])).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 16.95/3.12 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.95/3.12 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 16.95/3.12 | (is_a_theorem @
% 16.95/3.12 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 16.95/3.12 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 16.95/3.12 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.95/3.12 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X1))
% 16.95/3.12 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 16.95/3.12 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 16.95/3.12 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 16.95/3.12 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.95/3.12 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 16.95/3.12 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 16.95/3.12 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.95/3.12 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain,
% 16.95/3.12 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.95/3.12 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X2))
% 16.95/3.12 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 16.95/3.12 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl18])).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(zip_derived_cl32, plain,
% 16.95/3.12 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.95/3.12 (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X0)))),
% 16.95/3.12 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl20])).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 16.95/3.12 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.95/3.12 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2))
% 16.95/3.12 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ X0))
% 16.95/3.12 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.95/3.12 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(zip_derived_cl94, plain,
% 16.95/3.12 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.95/3.12 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 16.95/3.12 (implies @ (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X0) @ X0) @ X2))
% 16.95/3.12 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 16.95/3.12 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl32, zip_derived_cl18])).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(zip_derived_cl453, plain,
% 16.95/3.12 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.95/3.12 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X1 @ (implies @ X2 @ X0)))
% 16.95/3.12 | (is_a_theorem @ (implies @ X2 @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 16.95/3.12 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl94])).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(zip_derived_cl7483, plain,
% 16.95/3.12 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.95/3.12 (is_a_theorem @
% 16.95/3.12 (implies @ (implies @ X2 @ X0) @
% 16.95/3.12 (implies @ (implies @ X1 @ X2) @ (implies @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 16.95/3.12 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl453])).
% 16.95/3.12 thf(zip_derived_cl7523, plain, ($false),
% 16.95/3.12 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl7483])).
% 16.95/3.12
% 16.95/3.12 % SZS output end Refutation
% 16.95/3.12
% 16.95/3.12
% 16.95/3.12 % Terminating...
% 17.63/3.19 % Runner terminated.
% 17.63/3.20 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------