TSTP Solution File: LCL097-1 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : LCL097-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 13:43:59 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.69s 1.00s
% Output   : Refutation 0.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : LCL097-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Jul  4 06:23:38 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.69/1.00  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.69/1.00  Process 30532 was started by sandbox2 on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.69/1.00  Mon Jul  4 06:23:38 2022
% 0.69/1.00  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_30378_n008.cluster.edu".
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_30378_n008.cluster.edu
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.69/1.00  set(auto2).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.69/1.00      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.69/1.00      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.69/1.00      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.69/1.00  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.69/1.00  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.69/1.00  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.69/1.00  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.69/1.00  clear(print_given).
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (4 formulas)
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  Auto_denials:
% 0.69/1.00    % copying label prove_lg_4 to answer in negative clause
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.69/1.00  Function symbol KB weights:  a=1. b=1. c=1. e=1. falsehood=1. equivalent=1.
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.69/1.00  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.69/1.00  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  % Proof 1 at 0.04 (+ 0.01) seconds: prove_lg_4.
% 0.69/1.00  % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.69/1.00  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.69/1.00  % Maximum clause weight is 20.000.
% 0.69/1.00  % Given clauses 35.
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  1 is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C)),equivalent(B,C)),D),D)) # label(lg_2) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.00  2 is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,C)),D),equivalent(equivalent(B,C),D)),E),E)) # label(lg_3) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.00  3 -is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),c),e),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,falsehood),c),equivalent(equivalent(b,falsehood),e)))) # label(prove_lg_4) # label(negated_conjecture) # answer(prove_lg_4).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.00  4 -is_a_theorem(equivalent(A,B)) | -is_a_theorem(A) | is_a_theorem(B) # label(condensed_detachment) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.69/1.00  5 is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),C),equivalent(equivalent(D,B),equivalent(equivalent(A,D),C)))).  [hyper(4,a,2,a,b,2,a)].
% 0.69/1.00  6 is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(A,B))).  [hyper(4,a,2,a,b,1,a)].
% 0.69/1.00  8 is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(C,D),equivalent(C,E)),A),equivalent(equivalent(D,E),B)))).  [hyper(4,a,2,a,b,5,a)].
% 0.69/1.00  12 is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),equivalent(equivalent(C,A),equivalent(C,B)))).  [hyper(4,a,5,a,b,6,a)].
% 0.69/1.00  17 is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(B,C),equivalent(B,D)),E)),equivalent(A,equivalent(equivalent(C,D),E)))).  [hyper(4,a,2,a,b,12,a)].
% 0.69/1.00  551 is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,B),C),D),equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(A,E),C),equivalent(equivalent(B,E),D)))).  [hyper(4,a,17,a,b,8,a)].
% 0.69/1.00  552 $F # answer(prove_lg_4).  [resolve(551,a,3,a)].
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  Given=35. Generated=893. Kept=551. proofs=1.
% 0.69/1.00  Usable=34. Sos=487. Demods=0. Limbo=28, Disabled=5. Hints=0.
% 0.69/1.00  Megabytes=0.55.
% 0.69/1.00  User_CPU=0.05, System_CPU=0.01, Wall_clock=1.
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.69/1.00  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.69/1.00  
% 0.69/1.00  Process 30532 exit (max_proofs) Mon Jul  4 06:23:39 2022
% 0.69/1.00  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------