TSTP Solution File: LCL096-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : LCL096-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2AJFlJSzpS true
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:58:10 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 67.45s 10.28s
% Output : Refutation 67.45s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : LCL096-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.10/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.2AJFlJSzpS true
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 19:49:57 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.34 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.34 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.34 % Running in FO mode
% 0.53/0.66 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.53/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.53/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.53/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.53/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.53/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.53/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.53/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.53/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.53/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 67.45/10.28 % Solved by fo/fo13.sh.
% 67.45/10.28 % done 3486 iterations in 9.499s
% 67.45/10.28 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 67.45/10.28 % SZS output start Refutation
% 67.45/10.28 thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(equivalent_type, type, equivalent: $i > $i > $i).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(lg_4, axiom,
% 67.45/10.28 (is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ X @ Y ) @ Z ) @ U ) @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ X @ V ) @ Z ) @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ Y @ V ) @ U ) ) ))).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 67.45/10.28 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 67.45/10.28 (is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1) @ X2) @ X3) @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X4) @ X2) @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X4) @ X3))))),
% 67.45/10.28 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [lg_4])).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 67.45/10.28 (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( equivalent @ X @ Y ) ) ) |
% 67.45/10.28 ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) | ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 67.45/10.28 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 67.45/10.28 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 67.45/10.28 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 67.45/10.28 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 67.45/10.28 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain,
% 67.45/10.28 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 67.45/10.28 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X2) @ X3) @ X0))
% 67.45/10.28 | (is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X1) @ X3) @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))))),
% 67.45/10.28 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain,
% 67.45/10.28 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 67.45/10.28 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X2) @ X3) @ X0))
% 67.45/10.28 | (is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X4 @ X1) @ X3) @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ X0))))),
% 67.45/10.28 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(prove_lg_1, conjecture,
% 67.45/10.28 (is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @ a @ ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ b @ b ) @ a ) ) @ c ) @
% 67.45/10.28 c ))).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 67.45/10.28 (~( is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @ a @ ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ b @ b ) @ a ) ) @
% 67.45/10.28 c ) @
% 67.45/10.28 c ) )),
% 67.45/10.28 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_lg_1])).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 67.45/10.28 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ a @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ b @ b) @ a)) @ c) @
% 67.45/10.28 c))),
% 67.45/10.28 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 67.45/10.28 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 67.45/10.28 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 67.45/10.28 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 67.45/10.28 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 67.45/10.28 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 67.45/10.28 (![X0 : $i]:
% 67.45/10.28 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ X0 @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ a @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ b @ b) @ a)) @ c) @
% 67.45/10.28 c)))
% 67.45/10.28 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0))),
% 67.45/10.28 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(zip_derived_cl210, plain,
% 67.45/10.28 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 67.45/10.28 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ X1 @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ a @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ b @ b) @ a))) @
% 67.45/10.28 X0) @
% 67.45/10.28 c))
% 67.45/10.28 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ c) @ X0)))),
% 67.45/10.28 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl25, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(lg_2, axiom,
% 67.45/10.28 (is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ X @ Y ) @ ( equivalent @ X @ Z ) ) @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @ Y @ Z ) ) @
% 67.45/10.28 U ) @
% 67.45/10.28 U ))).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 67.45/10.28 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 67.45/10.28 (is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2)) @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ X1 @ X2)) @
% 67.45/10.28 X3) @
% 67.45/10.28 X3))),
% 67.45/10.28 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [lg_2])).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(zip_derived_cl263, plain,
% 67.45/10.28 (![X0 : $i]:
% 67.45/10.28 ~ (is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ a) @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ X0 @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ b @ b) @ a))) @
% 67.45/10.28 c) @
% 67.45/10.28 c))),
% 67.45/10.28 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl210, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 67.45/10.28 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 67.45/10.28 (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 67.45/10.28 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 67.45/10.28 | (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 67.45/10.28 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(zip_derived_cl269, plain,
% 67.45/10.28 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 67.45/10.28 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ X1 @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ a) @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ X0 @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ b @ b) @ a))) @
% 67.45/10.28 c) @
% 67.45/10.28 c)))
% 67.45/10.28 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 67.45/10.28 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl263, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(zip_derived_cl356, plain,
% 67.45/10.28 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 67.45/10.28 (~ (is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ X2 @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ a) @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ X0 @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ b @ b) @ a)))) @
% 67.45/10.28 X1) @
% 67.45/10.28 c))
% 67.45/10.28 | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ c) @ X1)))),
% 67.45/10.28 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl25, zip_derived_cl269])).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(lg_3, axiom,
% 67.45/10.28 (is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ X @ Y ) @ ( equivalent @ X @ Z ) ) @
% 67.45/10.28 U ) @
% 67.45/10.28 ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ Y @ Z ) @ U ) ) @
% 67.45/10.28 V ) @
% 67.45/10.28 V ))).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 67.45/10.28 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 67.45/10.28 (is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2)) @
% 67.45/10.28 X3) @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)) @
% 67.45/10.28 X4) @
% 67.45/10.28 X4))),
% 67.45/10.28 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [lg_3])).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(zip_derived_cl11054, plain,
% 67.45/10.28 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 67.45/10.28 ~ (is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ a)) @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ X0 @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ b @ b) @ a))) @
% 67.45/10.28 c) @
% 67.45/10.28 c))),
% 67.45/10.28 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl356, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 67.45/10.28 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 67.45/10.28 (is_a_theorem @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2)) @
% 67.45/10.28 X3) @
% 67.45/10.28 (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)) @
% 67.45/10.28 X4) @
% 67.45/10.28 X4))),
% 67.45/10.28 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [lg_3])).
% 67.45/10.28 thf(zip_derived_cl18379, plain, ($false),
% 67.45/10.28 inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11054, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 67.45/10.28
% 67.45/10.28 % SZS output end Refutation
% 67.45/10.28
% 67.45/10.28
% 67.45/10.28 % Terminating...
% 68.10/10.37 % Runner terminated.
% 68.10/10.39 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------