TSTP Solution File: LCL081-1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : LCL081-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:46:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.77s 0.58s
% Output   : Refutation 1.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   79 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   70 (  35   ~;  29   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   7 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (  40   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f208,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f48,f96,f136,f146,f182,f186,f207]) ).

fof(f207,plain,
    ~ spl1_13,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f200]) ).

fof(f200,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_13 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f135,f53]) ).

fof(f53,plain,
    ! [X6,X7,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(X5,a),implies(X6,a)),sF0),implies(X7,sF0))),
    inference(resolution,[],[f7,f8]) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sF0,X0),implies(implies(X0,a),implies(X1,a)))),
    inference(superposition,[],[f2,f4]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    implies(a,a) = sF0,
    introduced(function_definition,[]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,X1),X2),implies(implies(X2,X0),implies(X3,X0)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ic_JLukasiewicz) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X3),X0))
      | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(X2,X1))) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f2,f1]) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
      | is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

fof(f135,plain,
    ( ! [X4] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,sF0),implies(sF0,sF0)))
    | ~ spl1_13 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f134]) ).

fof(f134,plain,
    ( spl1_13
  <=> ! [X4] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,sF0),implies(sF0,sF0))) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_13])]) ).

fof(f186,plain,
    ( spl1_7
    | ~ spl1_10 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f183,f121,f69]) ).

fof(f69,plain,
    ( spl1_7
  <=> ! [X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(X2,sF0)) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_7])]) ).

fof(f121,plain,
    ( spl1_10
  <=> is_a_theorem(implies(sF0,sF0)) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_10])]) ).

fof(f183,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(X0,sF0))
    | ~ spl1_10 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f122,f110]) ).

fof(f110,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sF0,X3))
      | is_a_theorem(implies(X4,X3)) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f108]) ).

fof(f108,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sF0,X3))
      | is_a_theorem(implies(X4,X3))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sF0,X3)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f60,f1]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ! [X21,X22] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sF0,X21),implies(X22,X21)))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sF0,X21)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f7,f33]) ).

fof(f33,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,a),sF0))
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(sF0,X0)) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f13,f1]) ).

fof(f13,plain,
    ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sF0,X0),implies(implies(X0,a),sF0))),
    inference(superposition,[],[f8,f4]) ).

fof(f122,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(sF0,sF0))
    | ~ spl1_10 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f121]) ).

fof(f182,plain,
    ~ spl1_9,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f150]) ).

fof(f150,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_9 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f95,f62]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X0,sF0),implies(sF0,sF0)),implies(X1,implies(sF0,sF0)))),
    inference(resolution,[],[f56,f7]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ! [X13] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(sF0,sF0),sF0),implies(X13,sF0))),
    inference(resolution,[],[f7,f15]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sF0,a),implies(sF0,sF0))),
    inference(superposition,[],[f12,f4]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    ! [X0] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sF0,a),implies(sF0,implies(X0,a)))),
    inference(superposition,[],[f8,f4]) ).

fof(f95,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
    | ~ spl1_9 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f94]) ).

fof(f94,plain,
    ( spl1_9
  <=> ! [X0] : ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_9])]) ).

fof(f146,plain,
    ( spl1_10
    | spl1_9
    | ~ spl1_12 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f141,f131,f94,f121]) ).

fof(f131,plain,
    ( spl1_12
  <=> ! [X3] : is_a_theorem(implies(X3,implies(sF0,sF0))) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_12])]) ).

fof(f141,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | is_a_theorem(implies(sF0,sF0)) )
    | ~ spl1_12 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f132,f1]) ).

fof(f132,plain,
    ( ! [X3] : is_a_theorem(implies(X3,implies(sF0,sF0)))
    | ~ spl1_12 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f131]) ).

fof(f136,plain,
    ( spl1_12
    | spl1_13 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f129,f134,f131]) ).

fof(f129,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,sF0),implies(sF0,sF0)))
      | is_a_theorem(implies(X3,implies(sF0,sF0))) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f62,f1]) ).

fof(f96,plain,
    ( spl1_4
    | spl1_9
    | ~ spl1_7 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f87,f69,f94,f40]) ).

fof(f40,plain,
    ( spl1_4
  <=> is_a_theorem(sF0) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_4])]) ).

fof(f87,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
        | is_a_theorem(sF0) )
    | ~ spl1_7 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f70,f1]) ).

fof(f70,plain,
    ( ! [X2] : is_a_theorem(implies(X2,sF0))
    | ~ spl1_7 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f69]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ~ spl1_4,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f47]) ).

fof(f47,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f42,f5]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(sF0),
    inference(definition_folding,[],[f3,f4]) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ic_1) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(sF0)
    | ~ spl1_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f40]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12  % Problem    : LCL081-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 01:32:55 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.54  % (6310)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.56  % (6317)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/100Mi)
% 1.50/0.56  % (6317)First to succeed.
% 1.50/0.57  % (6312)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/51Mi)
% 1.50/0.57  TRYING [1]
% 1.50/0.57  % (6309)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/51Mi)
% 1.50/0.57  TRYING [2]
% 1.50/0.57  % (6327)ott+3_1:1_gsp=on:lcm=predicate:i=138:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/138Mi)
% 1.50/0.57  % (6319)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/99Mi)
% 1.77/0.58  % (6317)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.77/0.58  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 1.77/0.58  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 1.77/0.58  % (6317)------------------------------
% 1.77/0.58  % (6317)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 1.77/0.58  % (6317)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 1.77/0.58  % (6317)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.77/0.58  
% 1.77/0.58  % (6317)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.77/0.58  % (6317)Time elapsed: 0.151 s
% 1.77/0.58  % (6317)Instructions burned: 6 (million)
% 1.77/0.58  % (6317)------------------------------
% 1.77/0.58  % (6317)------------------------------
% 1.77/0.58  % (6305)Success in time 0.23 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------