TSTP Solution File: LCL076-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : LCL076-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:36:45 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.98s 1.20s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.98s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| is_a_theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).
cnf(c_50,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_18) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)),implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(X0,X2)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_35) ).
cnf(c_52,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X0),not(X1)),implies(X1,X0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cn_49) ).
cnf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(a,not(not(a)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_cn_40) ).
cnf(c_71,plain,
not(a) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_72,plain,
not(sP0_iProver_def) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_73,plain,
implies(a,sP1_iProver_def) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_74,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(sP2_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_71,c_72,c_73]) ).
cnf(c_179,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_196,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(sP1_iProver_def),not(a)),sP2_iProver_def)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_73,c_52]) ).
cnf(c_198,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(sP1_iProver_def),sP0_iProver_def),sP2_iProver_def)),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_196,c_71]) ).
cnf(c_209,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)))
| is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X0,X1),implies(X0,X2))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_216,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(sP1_iProver_def),sP0_iProver_def))
| is_a_theorem(sP2_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_198,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_217,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(sP1_iProver_def),sP0_iProver_def)),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_216,c_74]) ).
cnf(c_603,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X1,X2)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
| is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X2)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_209,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_632,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X0))
| is_a_theorem(implies(X2,X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_179,c_603]) ).
cnf(c_1094,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(not(X1),not(X2))))
| is_a_theorem(implies(X0,implies(X2,X1))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_632]) ).
cnf(c_1923,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(not(X0),implies(X0,X1))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_1094]) ).
cnf(c_2073,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(not(not(X0)),implies(X1,X0))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1923,c_1094]) ).
cnf(c_2353,plain,
is_a_theorem(implies(not(sP1_iProver_def),implies(X0,sP0_iProver_def))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_72,c_2073]) ).
cnf(c_2461,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(sP1_iProver_def),X0))
| is_a_theorem(implies(not(sP1_iProver_def),sP0_iProver_def)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2353,c_603]) ).
cnf(c_2462,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(implies(not(sP1_iProver_def),X0)),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2461,c_217]) ).
cnf(c_2463,plain,
$false,
inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2353,c_2462]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : LCL076-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Thu May 2 18:58:03 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.98/1.20 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.98/1.20 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20 ------ iProver source info
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 3.98/1.20 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 3.98/1.20 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20 ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.98/1.20 ------ Proving...
% 3.98/1.20 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20 clauses 8
% 3.98/1.20 conjectures 1
% 3.98/1.20 EPR 1
% 3.98/1.20 Horn 8
% 3.98/1.20 unary 7
% 3.98/1.20 binary 0
% 3.98/1.20 lits 10
% 3.98/1.20 lits eq 3
% 3.98/1.20 fd_pure 0
% 3.98/1.20 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.98/1.20 fd_cond 0
% 3.98/1.20 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 3.98/1.20 AC symbols 0
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20 ------
% 3.98/1.20 Current options:
% 3.98/1.20 ------
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20 ------ Proving...
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.98/1.20
% 3.98/1.20
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------