TSTP Solution File: LCL039-1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : LCL039-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:47:45 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 234.55s 234.52s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 234.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem    : LCL039-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime   : Thu Aug 24 19:38:57 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.59  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 234.52/234.50  %-------------------------------------------
% 234.52/234.50  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 234.52/234.50  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 234.52/234.50  % Transform   :cnf
% 234.52/234.50  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 234.52/234.50  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 234.52/234.50  
% 234.52/234.50  % Result      :Theorem 233.850000s
% 234.52/234.50  % Output      :CNFRefutation 233.850000s
% 234.52/234.50  %-------------------------------------------
% 234.55/234.52  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 234.55/234.52  % File     : LCL039-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 234.55/234.52  % Domain   : Logic Calculi (Implication/Negation 2 valued modal)
% 234.55/234.52  % Problem  : A theorem from Morgan
% 234.55/234.52  % Version  : [Pel86] axioms.
% 234.55/234.52  % English  : An axiomatisation of the Implication/Negation 2 valued
% 234.55/234.52  %            sentential calculus is {CN-18,CN-35,CN-49} by Church. This
% 234.55/234.52  %            can be extended to the  modal logic T by the addition
% 234.55/234.52  %            of three axioms for the modal operators. This problem proves
% 234.55/234.52  %            a simple result of T.
% 234.55/234.52  
% 234.55/234.52  % Refs     : [Mor84] Morgan (1984), Logic Problems
% 234.55/234.52  %          : [Pel86] Pelletier (1986), Seventy-five Problems for Testing Au
% 234.55/234.52  % Source   : [Pel86]
% 234.55/234.52  % Names    : Pelletier 69 [Pel86]
% 234.55/234.52  
% 234.55/234.52  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 234.55/234.52  % Rating   : 0.14 v8.1.0, 0.25 v7.4.0, 0.17 v7.3.0, 0.25 v6.2.0, 0.17 v6.1.0, 0.29 v6.0.0, 0.11 v5.5.0, 0.31 v5.4.0, 0.28 v5.3.0, 0.35 v5.2.0, 0.15 v5.1.0, 0.31 v5.0.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.33 v4.0.1, 0.00 v3.1.0, 0.17 v2.7.0, 0.38 v2.6.0, 0.29 v2.5.0, 0.00 v2.4.0, 0.00 v2.3.0, 0.14 v2.2.1, 0.56 v2.1.0, 0.63 v2.0.0
% 234.55/234.52  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    8 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
% 234.55/234.52  %            Number of literals    :   11 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
% 234.55/234.52  %            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
% 234.55/234.52  %            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
% 234.55/234.52  %            Number of predicates  :    1 (   1 usr;   0 prp; 1-1 aty)
% 234.55/234.52  %            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
% 234.55/234.52  %            Number of variables   :   13 (   1 sgn)
% 234.55/234.52  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN
% 234.55/234.52  
% 234.55/234.52  % Comments :
% 234.55/234.52  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 234.55/234.52  cnf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
% 234.55/234.52      ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y))
% 234.55/234.52      | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
% 234.55/234.52      | is_a_theorem(Y) ) ).
% 234.55/234.52  
% 234.55/234.52  cnf(cn_18,axiom,
% 234.55/234.52      is_a_theorem(implies(X,implies(Y,X))) ).
% 234.55/234.52  
% 234.55/234.52  cnf(cn_35,axiom,
% 234.55/234.52      is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X,implies(Y,Z)),implies(implies(X,Y),implies(X,Z)))) ).
% 234.55/234.52  
% 234.55/234.52  cnf(cn_49,axiom,
% 234.55/234.52      is_a_theorem(implies(implies(not(X),not(Y)),implies(Y,X))) ).
% 234.55/234.52  
% 234.55/234.52  cnf(necessitation1,axiom,
% 234.55/234.52      is_a_theorem(implies(necessary(implies(X,Y)),implies(necessary(X),necessary(Y)))) ).
% 234.55/234.52  
% 234.55/234.52  cnf(necessitation2,axiom,
% 234.55/234.52      is_a_theorem(implies(necessary(X),X)) ).
% 234.55/234.52  
% 234.55/234.52  cnf(axiom_of_necessitation,axiom,
% 234.55/234.52      ( ~ is_a_theorem(X)
% 234.55/234.52      | is_a_theorem(necessary(X)) ) ).
% 234.55/234.52  
% 234.55/234.52  cnf(prove_this,negated_conjecture,
% 234.55/234.52      ~ is_a_theorem(implies(necessary(a),not(necessary(not(a))))) ).
% 234.55/234.52  
% 234.55/234.52  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 234.55/234.52  %-------------------------------------------
% 234.55/234.52  % Proof found
% 234.55/234.52  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 234.55/234.52  % SZS output start Proof
% 234.57/234.53  %ClaNum:8(EqnAxiom:0)
% 234.57/234.53  %VarNum:26(SingletonVarNum:13)
% 234.57/234.53  %MaxLitNum:3
% 234.57/234.53  %MaxfuncDepth:4
% 234.57/234.53  %SharedTerms:7
% 234.57/234.53  %goalClause: 6
% 234.57/234.53  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 234.57/234.53  [6]~P1(f2(f1(a3),f4(f1(f4(a3)))))
% 234.57/234.53  [1]P1(f2(f1(x11),x11))
% 234.57/234.53  [2]P1(f2(x21,f2(x22,x21)))
% 234.57/234.53  [3]P1(f2(f2(f4(x31),f4(x32)),f2(x32,x31)))
% 234.57/234.53  [4]P1(f2(f1(f2(x41,x42)),f2(f1(x41),f1(x42))))
% 234.57/234.53  [5]P1(f2(f2(x51,f2(x52,x53)),f2(f2(x51,x52),f2(x51,x53))))
% 234.57/234.53  [7]~P1(x71)+P1(f1(x71))
% 234.57/234.53  [8]P1(x81)+~P1(x82)+~P1(f2(x82,x81))
% 234.57/234.53  %EqnAxiom
% 234.57/234.53  
% 234.57/234.53  %-------------------------------------------
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(19,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(f1(x191),f1(f2(x192,x191))))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,4,7,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(20,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(f2(x201,x202),f2(x201,x201)))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,5,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(40,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(f1(x401),f1(x401)))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,20,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(67,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(x671,f2(f1(x672),f1(x672))))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[40,2,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(119,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(x1191,f2(f2(f4(x1192),f4(x1193)),f2(x1193,x1192))))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,2,7,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(131,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(x1311,f2(f1(x1312),x1312)))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,2,7,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(135,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(f2(x1351,f1(x1352)),f2(x1351,x1352)))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[131,5,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(190,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(x1901,f2(f2(x1902,f2(x1903,x1904)),f2(f2(x1902,x1903),f2(x1902,x1904)))))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,2,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(212,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(x2121,x2121))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,190,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(217,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(f2(f2(x2171,x2172),x2171),f2(f2(x2171,x2172),x2172)))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[212,5,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(227,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(f2(f2(f2(f4(x2271),f4(x2272)),f2(x2272,x2271)),x2273),x2273))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[217,119,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(248,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(f2(x2481,f2(f4(x2482),f4(x2483))),f2(x2481,f2(x2483,x2482))))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[119,5,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(254,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(f2(f2(f2(f4(x2541),f4(x2542)),f2(x2542,x2541)),f2(f4(x2543),f4(x2544))),f2(x2544,x2543)))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[227,248,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(336,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(f2(f2(f1(x3361),f1(x3361)),x3362),x3362))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[67,217,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(361,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(f2(f2(f1(x3611),f1(x3611)),f1(x3612)),x3612))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[135,336,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(365,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f1(f2(f2(f2(f1(x3651),f1(x3651)),f1(x3652)),x3652)))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[361,7])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(381,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (~P1(f2(f2(f2(f4(x3811),f4(x3812)),f2(x3812,x3811)),f2(f4(x3813),f4(x3814))))+P1(f1(f2(x3814,x3813)))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[254,8,7])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(474,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(f4(x4741),f2(x4741,x4742)))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,248,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(487,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(f1(x4871),f2(x4872,x4871)))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[19,135,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(645,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(x6451,f2(f2(f2(f1(x6452),f1(x6452)),f1(x6453)),x6453)))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[365,487,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(992,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(f2(x9921,f2(f2(f1(x9922),f1(x9922)),f1(x9923))),f2(x9921,x9923)))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[5,645,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(1128,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(f4(f4(x11281)),f2(x11282,x11281)))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[474,248,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(1425,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (P1(f2(f4(f4(f1(x14251))),x14251))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[1128,992,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(2026,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (~P1(f2(f1(a3),f1(f4(f1(f4(a3))))))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[135,6,8])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(3799,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     (~P1(f2(f2(f2(f4(x37991),f4(x37992)),f2(x37992,x37991)),f2(f4(f4(f1(f4(a3)))),f4(a3))))),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[4,2026,8,381])).
% 234.57/234.55  cnf(3991,plain,
% 234.57/234.55     ($false),
% 234.57/234.55     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,3799,1425,8]),
% 234.57/234.55     ['proof']).
% 234.57/234.56  % SZS output end Proof
% 234.57/234.56  % Total time :233.850000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------