TSTP Solution File: LCL030-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LCL030-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 14:27:27 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 20.34s 20.55s
% Output : Refutation 20.34s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LCL030-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Jul 4 02:25:54 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n014.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.35 Mon Jul 4 02:25:54 2022
% 0.13/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 25122.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.13/0.35 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.13/0.35 in usable.
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.35
% 0.13/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.19/0.38 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.19/0.38 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.19/0.38 number of clauses in intial UL: 2
% 0.19/0.38 number of clauses initially in problem: 6
% 0.19/0.38 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 33
% 0.19/0.38 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 83
% 0.19/0.38 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.19/0.38 absolute distinct symbol count: 6
% 0.19/0.38 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.19/0.38 distinct function count: 1
% 0.19/0.38 distinct constant count: 4
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38
% 0.19/0.38 =========== start of search ===========
% 18.54/18.74
% 18.54/18.74
% 18.54/18.74 Changing weight limit from 60 to 58.
% 18.54/18.74
% 18.54/18.74 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 18.54/18.74
% 18.54/18.74 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 18.54/18.74
% 18.54/18.74 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 18.54/18.74
% 18.54/18.74 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 18.54/18.74
% 18.54/18.74 Model 4 [ 1 0 1004 ] (0.00 seconds, 226099 Inserts)
% 18.54/18.74
% 18.54/18.74 Model 5 [ 1 2 7648 ] (0.00 seconds, 219177 Inserts)
% 18.54/18.74
% 18.54/18.74 Model 6 [ 1 1 2135 ] (0.00 seconds, 239369 Inserts)
% 18.54/18.74
% 18.54/18.74 Model 7 [ 2 1 893 ] (0.00 seconds, 222041 Inserts)
% 18.54/18.74
% 18.54/18.74 Model 8 [ 2 1 304 ] (0.00 seconds, 223306 Inserts)
% 18.54/18.74
% 18.54/18.74 Resetting weight limit to 58 after 175 givens.
% 18.54/18.74
% 20.10/20.29
% 20.10/20.29
% 20.10/20.29 Changing weight limit from 58 to 40.
% 20.10/20.29
% 20.10/20.29 Resetting weight limit to 40 after 330 givens.
% 20.10/20.29
% 20.34/20.51
% 20.34/20.51
% 20.34/20.51 Changing weight limit from 40 to 34.
% 20.34/20.51
% 20.34/20.51 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 335 givens.
% 20.34/20.51
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55 Changing weight limit from 34 to 32.
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 340 givens.
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55 -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! --
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 20.14 sec ----> 15971 [binary,15970.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55 Length of proof is 9. Level of proof is 6.
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 20.34/20.55 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 20.34/20.55 % SZS output start Refutation
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55 1 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(A,B))| -is_a_theorem(A)|is_a_theorem(B).
% 20.34/20.55 2 [] {+} -is_a_theorem(implies(implies(a,implies(b,c)),implies(implies(a,b),implies(a,c)))).
% 20.34/20.55 3 [] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))).
% 20.34/20.55 4 [] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(B,A))).
% 20.34/20.55 5 [] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),A),A)).
% 20.34/20.55 7 [hyper,3,1,3] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,B)),D),implies(implies(C,A),D))).
% 20.34/20.55 17 [hyper,7,1,7] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(implies(D,B),implies(A,implies(D,C))))).
% 20.34/20.55 21 [hyper,7,1,5] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(A,B)),implies(A,B))).
% 20.34/20.55 26 [hyper,21,1,7] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,B),A),implies(implies(A,B),B))).
% 20.34/20.55 27 [hyper,21,1,4] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(A,implies(implies(B,implies(B,C)),implies(B,C)))).
% 20.34/20.55 72 [hyper,27,1,26] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(A,B)),implies(A,B)),C),C)).
% 20.34/20.55 153 [hyper,17,1,3] {+} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(implies(A,B),implies(C,implies(A,D))),E),implies(implies(C,implies(B,D)),E))).
% 20.34/20.55 1012 [hyper,72,1,7] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,implies(B,C))),implies(A,implies(B,C)))).
% 20.34/20.55 15970 [hyper,153,1,1012] {-} is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(implies(A,B),implies(A,C)))).
% 20.34/20.55 15971 [binary,15970.1,2.1] {-} $F.
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55 % SZS output end Refutation
% 20.34/20.55 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55 ============ end of search ============
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55 true clauses given 97 (28.4%)
% 20.34/20.55 false clauses given 244
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55 FALSE TRUE
% 20.34/20.55 12 0 104
% 20.34/20.55 14 141 297
% 20.34/20.55 16 926 460
% 20.34/20.55 18 1448 418
% 20.34/20.55 20 10 300
% 20.34/20.55 22 11 190
% 20.34/20.55 24 3 174
% 20.34/20.55 26 4 217
% 20.34/20.55 28 3 160
% 20.34/20.55 30 0 165
% 20.34/20.55 32 2 14
% 20.34/20.55 tot: 2548 2499 (49.5% true)
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55 Model 8 [ 2 1 304 ] (0.00 seconds, 223306 Inserts)
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 20.34/20.55
% 20.34/20.55 Process 25122 finished Mon Jul 4 02:26:14 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------