TSTP Solution File: LCL009-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : LCL009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8LtetBnpLb true

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 08:57:49 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.33s 0.90s
% Output   : Refutation 1.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : LCL009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.8LtetBnpLb true
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 05:38:08 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.62  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.62  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.62  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.22/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.22/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.22/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.22/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.33/0.90  % Solved by fo/fo13.sh.
% 1.33/0.90  % done 168 iterations in 0.120s
% 1.33/0.90  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.33/0.90  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.33/0.90  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(is_a_theorem_type, type, is_a_theorem: $i > $o).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(equivalent_type, type, equivalent: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(yql, axiom,
% 1.33/0.90    (is_a_theorem @
% 1.33/0.90     ( equivalent @
% 1.33/0.90       ( equivalent @ X @ Y ) @ 
% 1.33/0.90       ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ Z @ Y ) @ ( equivalent @ X @ Z ) ) ))).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 1.33/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.33/0.90          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.33/0.90           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1) @ 
% 1.33/0.90            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 1.33/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [yql])).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 1.33/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.33/0.90          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.33/0.90           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1) @ 
% 1.33/0.90            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 1.33/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [yql])).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(condensed_detachment, axiom,
% 1.33/0.90    (( ~( is_a_theorem @ ( equivalent @ X @ Y ) ) ) | 
% 1.33/0.90     ( ~( is_a_theorem @ X ) ) | ( is_a_theorem @ Y ))).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.33/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.33/0.90         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 1.33/0.90          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 1.33/0.90          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 1.33/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 1.33/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.33/0.90         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2))
% 1.33/0.90          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.33/0.90              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 1.33/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 1.33/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.33/0.90          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.33/0.90           (equivalent @ 
% 1.33/0.90            (equivalent @ X3 @ 
% 1.33/0.90             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0))) @ 
% 1.33/0.90            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)))),
% 1.33/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.33/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.33/0.90         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 1.33/0.90          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 1.33/0.90          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 1.33/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 1.33/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.33/0.90         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.33/0.90             (equivalent @ X0 @ 
% 1.33/0.90              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X3))))
% 1.33/0.90          |  (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 1.33/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 1.33/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.33/0.90          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.33/0.90           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1) @ 
% 1.33/0.90            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 1.33/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [yql])).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 1.33/0.90      (![X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.33/0.90          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.33/0.90           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 1.33/0.90      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain,
% 1.33/0.90      (![X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.33/0.90          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.33/0.90           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 1.33/0.90      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 1.33/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.33/0.90         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2))
% 1.33/0.90          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.33/0.90              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 1.33/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl24, plain,
% 1.33/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.33/0.90          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.33/0.90           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)) @ 
% 1.33/0.90            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)))),
% 1.33/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 1.33/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.33/0.90         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.33/0.90             (equivalent @ X0 @ 
% 1.33/0.90              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X3))))
% 1.33/0.90          |  (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 1.33/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl56, plain,
% 1.33/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.33/0.90          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.33/0.90           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @ 
% 1.33/0.90            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0) @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2))))),
% 1.33/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl24, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 1.33/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.33/0.90         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.33/0.90             (equivalent @ X0 @ 
% 1.33/0.90              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X3))))
% 1.33/0.90          |  (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 1.33/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.33/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl129, plain,
% 1.33/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.33/0.90          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.33/0.90           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X0)))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl56, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.46/0.90         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 1.46/0.90          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 1.46/0.90          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl144, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.46/0.90         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X1))
% 1.46/0.90          |  (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X0)))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl129, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl167, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (![X2 : $i]:  (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X2))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl144])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.46/0.90         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.46/0.90             (equivalent @ X0 @ 
% 1.46/0.90              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X3))))
% 1.46/0.90          |  (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.46/0.90         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2))
% 1.46/0.90          |  (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.46/0.90              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0))))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl19, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.46/0.90         ( (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.46/0.90            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @ 
% 1.46/0.90             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0) @ X3)))
% 1.46/0.90          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2) @ X3)))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl24, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.46/0.90          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.46/0.90           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0)) @ 
% 1.46/0.90            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(prove_ec_5, conjecture,
% 1.46/0.90    (is_a_theorem @
% 1.46/0.90     ( equivalent @
% 1.46/0.90       ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ a @ b ) @ c ) @ 
% 1.46/0.90       ( equivalent @ a @ ( equivalent @ b @ c ) ) ))).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 1.46/0.90    (~( is_a_theorem @
% 1.46/0.90        ( equivalent @
% 1.46/0.90          ( equivalent @ ( equivalent @ a @ b ) @ c ) @ 
% 1.46/0.90          ( equivalent @ a @ ( equivalent @ b @ c ) ) ) )),
% 1.46/0.90    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_ec_5])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.46/0.90          (equivalent @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ a @ b) @ c) @ 
% 1.46/0.90           (equivalent @ a @ (equivalent @ b @ c))))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.46/0.90         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 1.46/0.90          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 1.46/0.90          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (![X0 : $i]:
% 1.46/0.90         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.46/0.90             (equivalent @ X0 @ 
% 1.46/0.90              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ a @ b) @ c) @ 
% 1.46/0.90               (equivalent @ a @ (equivalent @ b @ c)))))
% 1.46/0.90          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl55, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.46/0.90          (equivalent @ (equivalent @ a @ (equivalent @ b @ c)) @ 
% 1.46/0.90           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ a @ b) @ c)))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl24, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.46/0.90         (~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X1))
% 1.46/0.90          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0)
% 1.46/0.90          |  (is_a_theorem @ X1))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [condensed_detachment])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl65, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (![X0 : $i]:
% 1.46/0.90         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.46/0.90             (equivalent @ X0 @ 
% 1.46/0.90              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ a @ (equivalent @ b @ c)) @ 
% 1.46/0.90               (equivalent @ (equivalent @ a @ b) @ c))))
% 1.46/0.90          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ X0))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl55, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl113, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (![X0 : $i]:
% 1.46/0.90         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.46/0.90             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ b @ c) @ X0) @ 
% 1.46/0.90              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ a @ b) @ c)))
% 1.46/0.90          | ~ (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ a @ X0)))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl19, zip_derived_cl65])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl235, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.46/0.90          (equivalent @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ b @ c) @ a) @ 
% 1.46/0.90           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ a @ b) @ c)))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl167, zip_derived_cl113])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.46/0.90         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.46/0.90             (equivalent @ X0 @ 
% 1.46/0.90              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X3))))
% 1.46/0.90          |  (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.46/0.90          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.46/0.90           (equivalent @ 
% 1.46/0.90            (equivalent @ X3 @ 
% 1.46/0.90             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2) @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0))) @ 
% 1.46/0.90            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @ X3)))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.46/0.90          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.46/0.90           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X2) @ 
% 1.46/0.90            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0) @ 
% 1.46/0.90             (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X2) @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X3)))))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.46/0.90         (~ (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.46/0.90             (equivalent @ X0 @ 
% 1.46/0.90              (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X3 @ X1) @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X3))))
% 1.46/0.90          |  (is_a_theorem @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X2 @ X1) @ X0)))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl142, plain,
% 1.46/0.90      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 1.46/0.90          (is_a_theorem @ 
% 1.46/0.90           (equivalent @ (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X0 @ X2) @ X1) @ 
% 1.46/0.90            (equivalent @ (equivalent @ X1 @ X0) @ X2)))),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl20, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 1.46/0.90  thf(zip_derived_cl368, plain, ($false),
% 1.46/0.90      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl235, zip_derived_cl142])).
% 1.46/0.90  
% 1.46/0.90  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.46/0.90  
% 1.46/0.90  
% 1.46/0.90  % Terminating...
% 1.46/0.97  % Runner terminated.
% 1.46/0.97  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------