TSTP Solution File: LCL006-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : LCL006-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:36:34 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.79s 1.04s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.79s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named definition)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| is_a_theorem(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).
cnf(c_50,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(X1,X0))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ec_4) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),X2),equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,X2)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ec_5) ).
cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(a,b),equivalent(c,a)),equivalent(b,c))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ec_1) ).
cnf(c_67,plain,
equivalent(a,b) = sP0_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_68,plain,
equivalent(c,a) = sP1_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_69,plain,
equivalent(sP0_iProver_def,sP1_iProver_def) = sP2_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_70,plain,
equivalent(b,c) = sP3_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_71,plain,
equivalent(sP2_iProver_def,sP3_iProver_def) = sP4_iProver_def,
definition ).
cnf(c_72,negated_conjecture,
~ is_a_theorem(sP4_iProver_def),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_70,c_68,c_67,c_69,c_71]) ).
cnf(c_180,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_214,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(sP0_iProver_def,X0),equivalent(a,equivalent(b,X0)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_67,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_218,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(sP4_iProver_def,X0),equivalent(sP2_iProver_def,equivalent(sP3_iProver_def,X0)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_71,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_220,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(X0,c),a),equivalent(X0,sP1_iProver_def))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_68,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_224,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),X2))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,X2))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_429,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(sP0_iProver_def,c),equivalent(a,sP3_iProver_def))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_214]) ).
cnf(c_456,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(a,sP3_iProver_def),equivalent(sP0_iProver_def,c))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_429,c_180]) ).
cnf(c_662,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(sP0_iProver_def,c),a),sP2_iProver_def)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_220]) ).
cnf(c_782,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,equivalent(X1,X0)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_224]) ).
cnf(c_783,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X0,X1),equivalent(X2,equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,X2))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_224]) ).
cnf(c_793,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(sP4_iProver_def,equivalent(X0,equivalent(sP2_iProver_def,equivalent(sP3_iProver_def,X0))))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_218,c_224]) ).
cnf(c_802,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(a,equivalent(sP3_iProver_def,equivalent(sP0_iProver_def,c)))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_456,c_224]) ).
cnf(c_908,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,equivalent(X1,X0))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_782,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_924,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(X1,X0),X1)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_908,c_180]) ).
cnf(c_925,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(X0)
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X1,X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_908,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_1524,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(sP3_iProver_def,equivalent(sP0_iProver_def,c)),a)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_802,c_180]) ).
cnf(c_1763,plain,
is_a_theorem(equivalent(sP3_iProver_def,equivalent(equivalent(sP0_iProver_def,c),a))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1524,c_224]) ).
cnf(c_2820,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
| is_a_theorem(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_924,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_4749,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,X1))
| is_a_theorem(equivalent(X2,equivalent(X0,equivalent(X1,X2)))) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_783,c_49]) ).
cnf(c_6741,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(sP2_iProver_def,equivalent(sP3_iProver_def,X0))))
| is_a_theorem(sP4_iProver_def) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_793,c_2820]) ).
cnf(c_6746,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,equivalent(sP2_iProver_def,equivalent(sP3_iProver_def,X0)))),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6741,c_72]) ).
cnf(c_6851,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(sP2_iProver_def,equivalent(sP3_iProver_def,X0)))
| ~ is_a_theorem(X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_925,c_6746]) ).
cnf(c_6903,plain,
( ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(X0,sP2_iProver_def))
| ~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(sP3_iProver_def,X0)) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4749,c_6851]) ).
cnf(c_6959,plain,
~ is_a_theorem(equivalent(equivalent(equivalent(sP0_iProver_def,c),a),sP2_iProver_def)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1763,c_6903]) ).
cnf(c_6972,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6959,c_662]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.09 % Problem : LCL006-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.09 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.28 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28 % DateTime : Thu May 2 19:14:08 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.29 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.37 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.79/1.04 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.79/1.04 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04 ------ iProver source info
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 3.79/1.04 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 3.79/1.04 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04 ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.79/1.04 ------ Proving...
% 3.79/1.04 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04 clauses 9
% 3.79/1.04 conjectures 1
% 3.79/1.04 EPR 1
% 3.79/1.04 Horn 9
% 3.79/1.04 unary 8
% 3.79/1.04 binary 0
% 3.79/1.04 lits 11
% 3.79/1.04 lits eq 5
% 3.79/1.04 fd_pure 0
% 3.79/1.04 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.79/1.04 fd_cond 0
% 3.79/1.04 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 3.79/1.04 AC symbols 0
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04 ------
% 3.79/1.04 Current options:
% 3.79/1.04 ------
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04 ------ Proving...
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.79/1.04
% 3.79/1.04
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------