TSTP Solution File: LAT388+4 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : LAT388+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:47:07 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 4.03s 1.82s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.03s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   49
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   52 (   3 unt;  47 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   26 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   23 (   2   ~;   3   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   6 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   70 (  41   >;  29   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   17 (  15 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   32 (  32 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (;   7   !;   1   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ aUpperBoundOfIn0 > aSupremumOfIn0 > aLowerBoundOfIn0 > aInfimumOfIn0 > sdtlseqdt0 > isOn0 > aSubsetOf0 > aFixedPointOf0 > aElementOf0 > isMonotone0 > isEmpty0 > aSet0 > aFunction0 > aElement0 > aCompleteLattice0 > cS1241 > sdtlpdtrp0 > #nlpp > szRzazndt0 > szDzozmdt0 > cS1142 > xp > xf > xU > xT > xS > xP > #skF_7 > #skF_21 > #skF_18 > #skF_6 > #skF_19 > #skF_1 > #skF_4 > #skF_14 > #skF_15 > #skF_10 > #skF_5 > #skF_8 > #skF_13 > #skF_17 > #skF_11 > #skF_3 > #skF_2 > #skF_12 > #skF_16 > #skF_9 > #skF_20

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff('#skF_7',type,
    '#skF_7': $i > $i ).

tff(xf,type,
    xf: $i ).

tff('#skF_21',type,
    '#skF_21': $i > $i ).

tff(aSet0,type,
    aSet0: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_18',type,
    '#skF_18': $i > $i ).

tff(cS1241,type,
    cS1241: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(cS1142,type,
    cS1142: $i > $i ).

tff(szDzozmdt0,type,
    szDzozmdt0: $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_6',type,
    '#skF_6': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(aFixedPointOf0,type,
    aFixedPointOf0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_19',type,
    '#skF_19': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i > $i ).

tff(aElement0,type,
    aElement0: $i > $o ).

tff(sdtlseqdt0,type,
    sdtlseqdt0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(xS,type,
    xS: $i ).

tff(sdtlpdtrp0,type,
    sdtlpdtrp0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(aUpperBoundOfIn0,type,
    aUpperBoundOfIn0: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_4',type,
    '#skF_4': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_14',type,
    '#skF_14': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(xP,type,
    xP: $i ).

tff('#skF_15',type,
    '#skF_15': $i > $i ).

tff(xU,type,
    xU: $i ).

tff('#skF_10',type,
    '#skF_10': $i > $i ).

tff(aSubsetOf0,type,
    aSubsetOf0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_5',type,
    '#skF_5': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(aLowerBoundOfIn0,type,
    aLowerBoundOfIn0: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(isMonotone0,type,
    isMonotone0: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_8',type,
    '#skF_8': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(xT,type,
    xT: $i ).

tff(aElementOf0,type,
    aElementOf0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_13',type,
    '#skF_13': $i > $i ).

tff(aFunction0,type,
    aFunction0: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_17',type,
    '#skF_17': $i > $i ).

tff(aInfimumOfIn0,type,
    aInfimumOfIn0: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_11',type,
    '#skF_11': $i > $i ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(isOn0,type,
    isOn0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(szRzazndt0,type,
    szRzazndt0: $i > $i ).

tff(isEmpty0,type,
    isEmpty0: $i > $o ).

tff(xp,type,
    xp: $i ).

tff('#skF_12',type,
    '#skF_12': $i > $i ).

tff(aSupremumOfIn0,type,
    aSupremumOfIn0: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_16',type,
    '#skF_16': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_9',type,
    '#skF_9': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(aCompleteLattice0,type,
    aCompleteLattice0: $i > $o ).

tff('#skF_20',type,
    '#skF_20': $i > $i ).

tff(f_475,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [W0] :
        ( ( aElementOf0(W0,xS)
          & ( ( aElementOf0(W0,xS)
              & ! [W1] :
                  ( aElementOf0(W1,xT)
                 => sdtlseqdt0(W1,W0) ) )
            | aUpperBoundOfIn0(W0,xT,xS) )
          & ! [W1] :
              ( ( aElementOf0(W1,xS)
                & ! [W2] :
                    ( aElementOf0(W2,xT)
                   => sdtlseqdt0(W2,W1) )
                & aUpperBoundOfIn0(W1,xT,xS) )
             => sdtlseqdt0(W0,W1) ) )
        | aSupremumOfIn0(W0,xT,xS) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

tff(f_449,hypothesis,
    ( aElementOf0(xp,szDzozmdt0(xf))
    & ( sdtlpdtrp0(xf,xp) = xp )
    & aFixedPointOf0(xp,xf)
    & ! [W0] :
        ( aElementOf0(W0,xT)
       => sdtlseqdt0(W0,xp) )
    & aUpperBoundOfIn0(xp,xT,xS)
    & ! [W0] :
        ( ( ( aElementOf0(W0,xS)
            & ! [W1] :
                ( aElementOf0(W1,xT)
               => sdtlseqdt0(W1,W0) ) )
          | aUpperBoundOfIn0(W0,xT,xS) )
       => sdtlseqdt0(xp,W0) )
    & aSupremumOfIn0(xp,xT,xS) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__1330) ).

tff(c_286,plain,
    ! [W0_250] : ~ aSupremumOfIn0(W0_250,xT,xS),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_475]) ).

tff(c_268,plain,
    aSupremumOfIn0(xp,xT,xS),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_449]) ).

tff(c_311,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_286,c_268]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : LAT388+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 12:04:51 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.03/1.82  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.03/1.83  
% 4.03/1.83  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.03/1.85  
% 4.03/1.85  Inference rules
% 4.03/1.85  ----------------------
% 4.03/1.85  #Ref     : 0
% 4.03/1.85  #Sup     : 0
% 4.03/1.85  #Fact    : 0
% 4.03/1.85  #Define  : 0
% 4.03/1.85  #Split   : 0
% 4.03/1.85  #Chain   : 0
% 4.03/1.85  #Close   : 0
% 4.03/1.85  
% 4.03/1.85  Ordering : KBO
% 4.03/1.85  
% 4.03/1.85  Simplification rules
% 4.03/1.85  ----------------------
% 4.03/1.85  #Subsume      : 150
% 4.03/1.85  #Demod        : 0
% 4.03/1.85  #Tautology    : 4
% 4.03/1.85  #SimpNegUnit  : 1
% 4.03/1.85  #BackRed      : 0
% 4.03/1.85  
% 4.03/1.85  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.03/1.85  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.03/1.85  
% 4.03/1.85  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.03/1.85  ----------------------
% 4.03/1.85  Preprocessing        : 0.71
% 4.03/1.85  Parsing              : 0.35
% 4.03/1.85  CNF conversion       : 0.07
% 4.03/1.85  Main loop            : 0.09
% 4.03/1.85  Inferencing          : 0.00
% 4.03/1.85  Reduction            : 0.04
% 4.03/1.85  Demodulation         : 0.03
% 4.03/1.85  BG Simplification    : 0.05
% 4.03/1.86  Subsumption          : 0.04
% 4.03/1.86  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 4.03/1.86  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.03/1.86  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.03/1.86  Total                : 0.85
% 4.03/1.86  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.03/1.86  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.03/1.86  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.03/1.86  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------