TSTP Solution File: LAT379+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LAT379+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:48:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 1.75s 1.93s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : LAT379+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 13:32:02 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n011.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.36 Wed Jun 29 13:32:02 2022
% 0.20/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 30608.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=11.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 89 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)|v1_xboole_0(k1_pre_topc(A)).
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 91 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)|v5_orders_2(k1_pre_topc(A),A).
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 90 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)|v1_finset_1(k1_pre_topc(A)).
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 92 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)|v1_membered(k1_pre_topc(A)).
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 93 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)|v2_membered(k1_pre_topc(A)).
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 94 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)|v3_membered(k1_pre_topc(A)).
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 95 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)|v4_membered(k1_pre_topc(A)).
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 96 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)|v5_membered(k1_pre_topc(A)).
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 97 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)|v1_waybel_0(k1_pre_topc(A),A).
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 98 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)|v2_waybel_0(k1_pre_topc(A),A).
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 101 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v1_xboole_0(A)|v1_xboole_0(B)| -v1_xboole_0(k2_tarski(A,B)).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 171 during input processing: 0 [copy,171,flip.1] {-} k2_tarski(A,B)=k2_tarski(B,A).
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 206 during input processing: 0 [copy,206,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.36 206 back subsumes 163.
% 0.20/0.36 206 back subsumes 133.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.44 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.44 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.44 number of clauses in intial UL: 162
% 0.20/0.44 number of clauses initially in problem: 205
% 0.20/0.44 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 79
% 0.20/0.44 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 87
% 0.20/0.44 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.20/0.44 absolute distinct symbol count: 66
% 0.20/0.44 distinct predicate count: 35
% 0.20/0.44 distinct function count: 18
% 0.20/0.44 distinct constant count: 13
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.44
% 0.20/0.44 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Model 3 [ 2 2 7957 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Model 4 [ 2 1 3584 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Model 7 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Model 8 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Model 9 [ 4 1 4667 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Model 10 [ 3 2 6073 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Model 11 [ 3 1 8264 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.75/1.93 k1_pre_topc($c5)=k1_xboole_0.
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 1.75/1.93 17 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 542.9 K.
% 1.75/1.93 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 1.75/1.93 sym_ent ( 304) 180 0 180 0 53.4 K
% 1.75/1.93 term ( 32) 19314 17004 2310 3 72.3 K
% 1.75/1.93 rel ( 40) 14658 12514 2144 0 83.8 K
% 1.75/1.93 term_ptr ( 16) 5581 410 5171 38 81.4 K
% 1.75/1.93 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.75/1.93 fpa_head ( 24) 1048 34 1014 16 24.1 K
% 1.75/1.93 fpa_tree ( 56) 1214 1214 0 15 0.8 K
% 1.75/1.93 context (1288) 3432 3432 0 9 11.3 K
% 1.75/1.93 trail ( 24) 6396 6396 0 4 0.1 K
% 1.75/1.93 imd_tree ( 32) 6 2 4 0 0.1 K
% 1.75/1.93 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.75/1.93 is_tree ( 24) 791 47 744 9 17.6 K
% 1.75/1.93 is_pos (2424) 3319 3319 0 10 23.7 K
% 1.75/1.93 fsub_pos ( 16) 1202 1202 0 1 0.0 K
% 1.75/1.93 literal ( 32) 2526 1318 1208 0 37.8 K
% 1.75/1.93 clause ( 88) 691 187 504 0 43.3 K
% 1.75/1.93 list ( 272) 94 87 7 2 2.4 K
% 1.75/1.93 clash_nd ( 80) 786 786 0 7 0.5 K
% 1.75/1.93 clause_ptr ( 16) 379 40 339 3 5.3 K
% 1.75/1.93 int_ptr ( 16) 1254 542 712 0 11.1 K
% 1.75/1.93 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.75/1.93 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.75/1.93 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.75/1.93 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.75/1.93 formula( 40) 1321 1321 0 644 25.2 K
% 1.75/1.93 formula_ptr( 16) 84 84 0 84 1.3 K
% 1.75/1.93 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 1.75/1.93 time 1 (0 hr, 0 min, 1 sec)
% 1.75/1.93 input time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 clausify time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 process input 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 pick given time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 hyper_res time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 para_into time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 para_from time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 pre_process time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 renumber time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 demod time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 order equalities 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 unit deleletion 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 factor simplify 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 weigh cl time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 hints keep time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 sort lits time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 forward subsume 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 delete cl time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 keep cl time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 hints time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 print_cl time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 conflict time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 new demod time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 post_process time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 back demod time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 back subsume 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 factor time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 FINDER time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93 unindex time 0.00
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 true clauses given 2 (15.4%)
% 1.75/1.93 false clauses given 11
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 FALSE TRUE
% 1.75/1.93 2 4 16
% 1.75/1.93 3 3 26
% 1.75/1.93 4 10 31
% 1.75/1.93 5 0 4
% 1.75/1.93 6 8 12
% 1.75/1.93 7 3 0
% 1.75/1.93 8 1 7
% 1.75/1.93 10 0 5
% 1.75/1.93 17 0 1
% 1.75/1.93 tot: 29 102 (77.9% true)
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Model 11 [ 3 1 8264 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 1.75/1.93 1:0 2:0 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:0 7:0 8:0 9:0 10:0
% 1.75/1.93 11:0 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 1.75/1.93 21:0 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 1.75/1.93 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:2 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 1.75/1.93 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 1.75/1.93 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:0 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:0
% 1.75/1.93 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:0 65:0 66:0 67:0 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 1.75/1.93 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:0 80:0
% 1.75/1.93 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:1 90:1
% 1.75/1.93 91:1 92:1 93:1 94:1 95:1 96:1 97:1 98:1 99:0
% 1.75/1.93 All others: 62.
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 1.75/1.93
% 1.75/1.93 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------