TSTP Solution File: LAT362+4 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : LAT362+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:30:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 13.43s 7.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 13.43s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 15
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 33 ( 5 unt; 22 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 83 ( 0 equ; 30 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 12 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 11 ( 10 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 32 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1021,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| v3_struct_0(X2)
| r2_functor0(X2,X1)
| ~ l2_altcat_1(X1)
| ~ l2_altcat_1(X2)
| ~ v2_altcat_1(X1)
| ~ v2_altcat_1(X2)
| ~ v12_altcat_1(X1)
| ~ v12_altcat_1(X2)
| ~ m2_functor0(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ v16_functor0(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ v21_functor0(X3,X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4lifju7n/lgb.p',i_0_1021) ).
cnf(i_0_2513,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| v21_functor0(k6_waybel34(X1),k4_waybel34(X1),k5_waybel34(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4lifju7n/lgb.p',i_0_2513) ).
cnf(i_0_2447,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| v2_altcat_1(k5_waybel34(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4lifju7n/lgb.p',i_0_2447) ).
cnf(i_0_2384,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| v2_altcat_1(k4_waybel34(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4lifju7n/lgb.p',i_0_2384) ).
cnf(i_0_2443,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| v12_altcat_1(k5_waybel34(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4lifju7n/lgb.p',i_0_2443) ).
cnf(i_0_2380,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| v12_altcat_1(k4_waybel34(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4lifju7n/lgb.p',i_0_2380) ).
cnf(i_0_1566,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| m2_functor0(k6_waybel34(X1),k4_waybel34(X1),k5_waybel34(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4lifju7n/lgb.p',i_0_1566) ).
cnf(i_0_2514,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| v16_functor0(k6_waybel34(X1),k4_waybel34(X1),k5_waybel34(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4lifju7n/lgb.p',i_0_2514) ).
cnf(i_0_2448,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| ~ v3_struct_0(k5_waybel34(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4lifju7n/lgb.p',i_0_2448) ).
cnf(i_0_2385,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| ~ v3_struct_0(k4_waybel34(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4lifju7n/lgb.p',i_0_2385) ).
cnf(i_0_1513,plain,
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
| l2_altcat_1(k4_waybel34(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4lifju7n/lgb.p',i_0_1513) ).
cnf(i_0_1547,plain,
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
| l2_altcat_1(k5_waybel34(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4lifju7n/lgb.p',i_0_1547) ).
cnf(i_0_175,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4lifju7n/lgb.p',i_0_175) ).
cnf(i_0_5775,negated_conjecture,
~ r2_functor0(k4_waybel34(esk719_0),k5_waybel34(esk719_0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4lifju7n/lgb.p',i_0_5775) ).
cnf(i_0_5776,negated_conjecture,
~ v2_setfam_1(esk719_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-4lifju7n/lgb.p',i_0_5776) ).
cnf(c_0_5792,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| v3_struct_0(X2)
| r2_functor0(X2,X1)
| ~ l2_altcat_1(X1)
| ~ l2_altcat_1(X2)
| ~ v2_altcat_1(X1)
| ~ v2_altcat_1(X2)
| ~ v12_altcat_1(X1)
| ~ v12_altcat_1(X2)
| ~ m2_functor0(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ v16_functor0(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ v21_functor0(X3,X2,X1) ),
i_0_1021 ).
cnf(c_0_5793,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| v21_functor0(k6_waybel34(X1),k4_waybel34(X1),k5_waybel34(X1)) ),
i_0_2513 ).
cnf(c_0_5794,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| v2_altcat_1(k5_waybel34(X1)) ),
i_0_2447 ).
cnf(c_0_5795,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| v2_altcat_1(k4_waybel34(X1)) ),
i_0_2384 ).
cnf(c_0_5796,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| v12_altcat_1(k5_waybel34(X1)) ),
i_0_2443 ).
cnf(c_0_5797,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| v12_altcat_1(k4_waybel34(X1)) ),
i_0_2380 ).
cnf(c_0_5798,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| m2_functor0(k6_waybel34(X1),k4_waybel34(X1),k5_waybel34(X1)) ),
i_0_1566 ).
cnf(c_0_5799,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| v16_functor0(k6_waybel34(X1),k4_waybel34(X1),k5_waybel34(X1)) ),
i_0_2514 ).
cnf(c_0_5800,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| ~ v3_struct_0(k5_waybel34(X1)) ),
i_0_2448 ).
cnf(c_0_5801,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| ~ v3_struct_0(k4_waybel34(X1)) ),
i_0_2385 ).
cnf(c_0_5802,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| r2_functor0(k4_waybel34(X1),k5_waybel34(X1))
| ~ l2_altcat_1(k4_waybel34(X1))
| ~ l2_altcat_1(k5_waybel34(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5792,c_0_5793]),c_0_5794]),c_0_5795]),c_0_5796]),c_0_5797]),c_0_5798]),c_0_5799]),c_0_5800]),c_0_5801]) ).
cnf(c_0_5803,plain,
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
| l2_altcat_1(k4_waybel34(X1)) ),
i_0_1513 ).
cnf(c_0_5804,plain,
( v1_xboole_0(X1)
| l2_altcat_1(k5_waybel34(X1)) ),
i_0_1547 ).
cnf(c_0_5805,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X1) ),
i_0_175 ).
cnf(c_0_5806,negated_conjecture,
~ r2_functor0(k4_waybel34(esk719_0),k5_waybel34(esk719_0)),
i_0_5775 ).
cnf(c_0_5807,plain,
( v2_setfam_1(X1)
| r2_functor0(k4_waybel34(X1),k5_waybel34(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5802,c_0_5803]),c_0_5804]),c_0_5805]) ).
cnf(c_0_5808,negated_conjecture,
~ v2_setfam_1(esk719_0),
i_0_5776 ).
cnf(c_0_5809,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5806,c_0_5807]),c_0_5808]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : LAT362+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 17:21:34 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 2.23/2.42 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.23/2.42 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 2.23/2.42 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 2.23/2.42 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 13.43/7.61 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 13.43/7.61 # No SInE strategy applied
% 13.43/7.61 # Trying AutoSched0 for 148 seconds
% 13.43/7.61 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 13.43/7.61 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 13.43/7.61 #
% 13.43/7.61 # Preprocessing time : 0.014 s
% 13.43/7.61 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 13.43/7.61
% 13.43/7.61 # Proof found!
% 13.43/7.61 # SZS status Theorem
% 13.43/7.61 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 13.43/7.61 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 13.43/7.61
% 13.43/7.61 # -------------------------------------------------
% 13.43/7.61 # User time : 0.020 s
% 13.43/7.61 # System time : 0.005 s
% 13.43/7.61 # Total time : 0.025 s
% 13.43/7.61 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 13.43/7.61
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------