TSTP Solution File: LAT349+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LAT349+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:47:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 19.77s 19.97s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : LAT349+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.20/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.20/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.20/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 14:06:28 EDT 2022
% 0.20/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.42 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.42 The process was started by sandbox on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.42 Thu Jun 30 14:06:28 2022
% 0.20/0.42 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 21614.
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.42 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.42 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=17.
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.42 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.42 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.42 clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.42 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 16 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -v3_orders_2(A)| -v4_orders_2(A)| -v1_lattice3(A)| -v2_lattice3(A)| -v2_waybel_8(A)| -v3_struct_0(A).
% 0.20/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 33 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -v3_orders_2(A)| -v4_orders_2(A)| -v1_lattice3(A)| -v2_lattice3(A)| -v1_waybel_5(A)| -v3_struct_0(A).
% 0.20/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 33 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -v3_orders_2(A)| -v4_orders_2(A)| -v1_lattice3(A)| -v2_lattice3(A)| -v3_waybel_8(A)| -v3_struct_0(A).
% 0.20/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 33 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -v3_orders_2(A)| -v4_orders_2(A)| -v1_lattice3(A)| -v2_lattice3(A)| -v1_waybel_5(A)| -v3_struct_0(A).
% 0.20/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 33 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -v3_orders_2(A)| -v4_orders_2(A)| -v1_lattice3(A)| -v2_lattice3(A)| -v3_realset2(A)| -v3_struct_0(A).
% 0.20/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 16 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -l1_orders_2(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -v1_lattice3(A)| -v24_waybel_0(A)| -v3_struct_0(A).
% 0.20/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 113 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -v3_orders_2(A)| -l1_orders_2(A)| -v2_waybel_0(B,A)| -m1_subset_1(B,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A)))|v13_waybel_0(k5_waybel_0(A,B),A).
% 0.20/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 86 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -m1_relset_1(A,k1_tarski(B),k1_tarski(B))|v1_orders_2(g1_orders_2(k1_tarski(B),A)).
% 0.20/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 163 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -l1_orders_2(A)| -v3_struct_0(g1_orders_2(u1_struct_0(A),u1_orders_2(A))).
% 0.20/0.42 Following clause subsumed by 164 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v2_orders_2(A)| -l1_orders_2(A)|v1_orders_2(g1_orders_2(u1_struct_0(A),u1_orders_2(A))).
% 0.20/0.42 67 back subsumes 11.
% 0.20/0.42 151 back subsumes 150.
% 0.20/0.42 152 back subsumes 134.
% 0.20/0.42 153 back subsumes 135.
% 0.20/0.42 154 back subsumes 136.
% 0.20/0.42 155 back subsumes 137.
% 0.20/0.42 156 back subsumes 138.
% 0.20/0.42 157 back subsumes 145.
% 0.20/0.42 158 back subsumes 146.
% 0.20/0.42 159 back subsumes 139.
% 0.20/0.42 160 back subsumes 142.
% 0.20/0.42 161 back subsumes 143.
% 0.20/0.42 163 back subsumes 106.
% 0.20/0.42 163 back subsumes 102.
% 0.20/0.42 164 back subsumes 107.
% 0.20/0.42 164 back subsumes 103.
% 0.20/0.42 165 back subsumes 108.
% 0.20/0.42 165 back subsumes 104.
% 0.20/0.42 166 back subsumes 115.
% 0.20/0.42 167 back subsumes 117.
% 0.20/0.42 169 back subsumes 118.
% 0.20/0.42 169 back subsumes 109.
% 0.20/0.42 171 back subsumes 114.
% 0.20/0.42 173 back subsumes 120.
% 0.20/0.42 176 back subsumes 119.
% 0.20/0.42
% 0.20/0.42 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 297 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v1_orders_2(k3_yellow_1(A)).
% 0.20/0.43 295 back subsumes 153.
% 0.20/0.43 415 back subsumes 270.
% 0.20/0.43 Following clause subsumed by 417 during input processing: 0 [copy,417,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.43 417 back subsumes 272.
% 0.20/0.43 417 back subsumes 268.
% 0.20/0.43
% 0.20/0.43 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.77/1.01
% 0.77/1.01 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.77/1.01
% 0.77/1.01 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.77/1.01
% 0.77/1.01
% 0.77/1.01 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.77/1.01
% 0.77/1.01 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.77/1.01 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.77/1.01 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.77/1.01 number of clauses in intial UL: 225
% 0.77/1.01 number of clauses initially in problem: 373
% 0.77/1.01 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 60
% 0.77/1.01 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 82
% 0.77/1.01 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.77/1.01 absolute distinct symbol count: 108
% 0.77/1.01 distinct predicate count: 46
% 0.77/1.01 distinct function count: 41
% 0.77/1.01 distinct constant count: 21
% 0.77/1.01
% 0.77/1.01 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.77/1.01
% 0.77/1.01
% 0.77/1.01
% 0.77/1.01 =========== start of search ===========
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Model 5 [ 3 97 249950 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Model 6 [ 2 30 115210 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Model 7 [ 1 33 127135 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Model 8 [ 3 93 237236 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Model 9 [ 7 57 160754 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 Input error on line 347: clause (0) { p_v2_orders_2(v0), p_v3_orders_2(v0), p_v4_orders_2(v0), p_v3_lattice3(v0), p_v3_waybel_3(v0), p_l1_orders_2(v0), p_v1_funct_1(v1), p_v1_funct_2(v1,f_k1_waybel22(v2),f_u1_struct_0(v0)), p_m2_relset_1(v1,f_k1_waybel22(v2),f_u1_struct_0(v0)), p_v1_funct_1(v3), p_v1_funct_2(v3,f_u1_struct_0(f_k2_yellow_1(f_k9_waybel_0(f_k3_yellow_1(v2)))),f_u1_struct_0(v0)), p_m2_relset_1(v3,f_u1_struct_0(f_k2_yellow_1(f_k9_waybel_0(f_k3_yellow_1(v2)))),f_u1_struct_0(v0)) -> p_v3_struct_0(v0); p_eq(v3,f_k2_waybel22(v2,v0,v1)); p_m1_subset_1(f_$f2(v2,v0,v1,v3),f_u1_struct_0(f_k2_yellow_1(f_k9_waybel_0(f_k3_yellow_1(v2))))). } end.
% 19.77/19.97
% 19.77/19.97 ( found where a function symbol was expected
% 19.77/19.97
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------