TSTP Solution File: LAT347+2 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : LAT347+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:47:33 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.55s 163.70s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.55s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   50 (  19 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  185 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  213 (  78   ~;  68   |;  52   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  15  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   15 (  13 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   0 sgn  24   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t1_waybel22,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( v2_orders_2(X1)
        & v3_orders_2(X1)
        & v4_orders_2(X1)
        & v2_yellow_0(X1)
        & v2_lattice3(X1)
        & l1_orders_2(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
            & v1_waybel_0(X2,k2_yellow_1(k9_waybel_0(X1)))
            & m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(k2_yellow_1(k9_waybel_0(X1))))) )
         => k1_yellow_0(k2_yellow_1(k9_waybel_0(X1)),X2) = k3_tarski(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p',t1_waybel22) ).

fof(cc2_lattice3,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( l1_orders_2(X1)
     => ( v2_lattice3(X1)
       => ~ v3_struct_0(X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+335.ax',cc2_lattice3) ).

fof(t7_waybel16,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
        & v2_orders_2(X1)
        & v3_orders_2(X1)
        & l1_orders_2(X1) )
     => k9_waybel_0(X1) = k8_waybel_0(k7_lattice3(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+537.ax',t7_waybel16) ).

fof(fc10_yellow_7,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( v2_yellow_0(X1)
        & l1_orders_2(X1) )
     => ( v1_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X1))
        & v1_yellow_0(k7_lattice3(X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+495.ax',fc10_yellow_7) ).

fof(fc5_yellow_7,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( v2_lattice3(X1)
        & l1_orders_2(X1) )
     => ( ~ v3_struct_0(k7_lattice3(X1))
        & v1_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X1))
        & v1_lattice3(k7_lattice3(X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+495.ax',fc5_yellow_7) ).

fof(fc3_yellow_7,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( v4_orders_2(X1)
        & l1_orders_2(X1) )
     => ( v1_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X1))
        & v4_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+495.ax',fc3_yellow_7) ).

fof(fc2_yellow_7,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( v3_orders_2(X1)
        & l1_orders_2(X1) )
     => ( v1_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X1))
        & v3_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+495.ax',fc2_yellow_7) ).

fof(fc1_yellow_7,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( v2_orders_2(X1)
        & l1_orders_2(X1) )
     => ( v1_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X1))
        & v2_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+495.ax',fc1_yellow_7) ).

fof(dt_k7_lattice3,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( l1_orders_2(X1)
     => ( v1_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X1))
        & l1_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+335.ax',dt_k7_lattice3) ).

fof(t9_waybel13,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ( v2_orders_2(X1)
        & v3_orders_2(X1)
        & v4_orders_2(X1)
        & v1_lattice3(X1)
        & v1_yellow_0(X1)
        & l1_orders_2(X1) )
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
            & v1_waybel_0(X2,k2_yellow_1(k8_waybel_0(X1)))
            & m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(k2_yellow_1(k8_waybel_0(X1))))) )
         => k1_yellow_0(k2_yellow_1(k8_waybel_0(X1)),X2) = k3_tarski(X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET007/SET007+509.ax',t9_waybel13) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ( ( v2_orders_2(X1)
          & v3_orders_2(X1)
          & v4_orders_2(X1)
          & v2_yellow_0(X1)
          & v2_lattice3(X1)
          & l1_orders_2(X1) )
       => ! [X2] :
            ( ( ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
              & v1_waybel_0(X2,k2_yellow_1(k9_waybel_0(X1)))
              & m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(k2_yellow_1(k9_waybel_0(X1))))) )
           => k1_yellow_0(k2_yellow_1(k9_waybel_0(X1)),X2) = k3_tarski(X2) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t1_waybel22]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ l1_orders_2(X2)
      | ~ v2_lattice3(X2)
      | ~ v3_struct_0(X2) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cc2_lattice3])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( v2_orders_2(esk1_0)
    & v3_orders_2(esk1_0)
    & v4_orders_2(esk1_0)
    & v2_yellow_0(esk1_0)
    & v2_lattice3(esk1_0)
    & l1_orders_2(esk1_0)
    & ~ v1_xboole_0(esk2_0)
    & v1_waybel_0(esk2_0,k2_yellow_1(k9_waybel_0(esk1_0)))
    & m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(k2_yellow_1(k9_waybel_0(esk1_0)))))
    & k1_yellow_0(k2_yellow_1(k9_waybel_0(esk1_0)),esk2_0) != k3_tarski(esk2_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( v3_struct_0(X2)
      | ~ v2_orders_2(X2)
      | ~ v3_orders_2(X2)
      | ~ l1_orders_2(X2)
      | k9_waybel_0(X2) = k8_waybel_0(k7_lattice3(X2)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t7_waybel16])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ v2_lattice3(X1)
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    v2_lattice3(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    l1_orders_2(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( v1_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X2))
        | ~ v2_yellow_0(X2)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X2) )
      & ( v1_yellow_0(k7_lattice3(X2))
        | ~ v2_yellow_0(X2)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X2) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc10_yellow_7])])]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( ~ v3_struct_0(k7_lattice3(X2))
        | ~ v2_lattice3(X2)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X2) )
      & ( v1_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X2))
        | ~ v2_lattice3(X2)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X2) )
      & ( v1_lattice3(k7_lattice3(X2))
        | ~ v2_lattice3(X2)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X2) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fc5_yellow_7])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( v1_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X2))
        | ~ v4_orders_2(X2)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X2) )
      & ( v4_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X2))
        | ~ v4_orders_2(X2)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X2) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc3_yellow_7])])]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( v1_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X2))
        | ~ v3_orders_2(X2)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X2) )
      & ( v3_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X2))
        | ~ v3_orders_2(X2)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X2) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc2_yellow_7])])]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( v1_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X2))
        | ~ v2_orders_2(X2)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X2) )
      & ( v2_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X2))
        | ~ v2_orders_2(X2)
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X2) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fc1_yellow_7])])]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( v1_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X2))
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X2) )
      & ( l1_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X2))
        | ~ l1_orders_2(X2) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[dt_k7_lattice3])])]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ~ v2_orders_2(X3)
      | ~ v3_orders_2(X3)
      | ~ v4_orders_2(X3)
      | ~ v1_lattice3(X3)
      | ~ v1_yellow_0(X3)
      | ~ l1_orders_2(X3)
      | v1_xboole_0(X4)
      | ~ v1_waybel_0(X4,k2_yellow_1(k8_waybel_0(X3)))
      | ~ m1_subset_1(X4,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(k2_yellow_1(k8_waybel_0(X3)))))
      | k1_yellow_0(k2_yellow_1(k8_waybel_0(X3)),X4) = k3_tarski(X4) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t9_waybel13])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( k9_waybel_0(X1) = k8_waybel_0(k7_lattice3(X1))
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X1)
    | ~ v3_orders_2(X1)
    | ~ v2_orders_2(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    v3_orders_2(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    v2_orders_2(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( v1_yellow_0(k7_lattice3(X1))
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X1)
    | ~ v2_yellow_0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    v2_yellow_0(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( v1_lattice3(k7_lattice3(X1))
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X1)
    | ~ v2_lattice3(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( v4_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X1))
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X1)
    | ~ v4_orders_2(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    v4_orders_2(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( v3_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X1))
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X1)
    | ~ v3_orders_2(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( v2_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X1))
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X1)
    | ~ v2_orders_2(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( l1_orders_2(k7_lattice3(X1))
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( k1_yellow_0(k2_yellow_1(k8_waybel_0(X1)),X2) = k3_tarski(X2)
    | v1_xboole_0(X2)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(k2_yellow_1(k8_waybel_0(X1)))))
    | ~ v1_waybel_0(X2,k2_yellow_1(k8_waybel_0(X1)))
    | ~ l1_orders_2(X1)
    | ~ v1_yellow_0(X1)
    | ~ v1_lattice3(X1)
    | ~ v4_orders_2(X1)
    | ~ v3_orders_2(X1)
    | ~ v2_orders_2(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    k8_waybel_0(k7_lattice3(esk1_0)) = k9_waybel_0(esk1_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),c_0_16])]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    v1_yellow_0(k7_lattice3(esk1_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    v1_lattice3(k7_lattice3(esk1_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    v4_orders_2(k7_lattice3(esk1_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    v3_orders_2(k7_lattice3(esk1_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_25]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    v2_orders_2(k7_lattice3(esk1_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_26]),c_0_16])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    l1_orders_2(k7_lattice3(esk1_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ( k1_yellow_0(k2_yellow_1(k9_waybel_0(esk1_0)),X1) = k3_tarski(X1)
    | v1_xboole_0(X1)
    | ~ v1_waybel_0(X1,k2_yellow_1(k9_waybel_0(esk1_0)))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(k2_yellow_1(k9_waybel_0(esk1_0))))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38]),c_0_39]),c_0_40]),c_0_41]),c_0_42]),c_0_43])]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk2_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(k2_yellow_1(k9_waybel_0(esk1_0))))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    v1_waybel_0(esk2_0,k2_yellow_1(k9_waybel_0(esk1_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    k1_yellow_0(k2_yellow_1(k9_waybel_0(esk1_0)),esk2_0) != k3_tarski(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v1_xboole_0(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_46])]),c_0_47]),c_0_48]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : LAT347+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 01:32:11 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.82/23.87  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.82/23.87  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.82/23.87  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.82/23.88  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.94/46.89  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.94/46.90  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.94/46.90  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.94/46.90  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.06/69.91  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.06/69.91  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.06/69.92  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.06/69.95  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.18/92.93  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.18/92.94  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.18/92.96  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.18/92.97  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.29/115.95  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.29/115.98  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.29/115.98  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.29/115.99  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.41/138.99  eprover: eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminatingCPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.41/138.99  
% 1.41/139.00  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.41/139.01  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.55/162.01  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.55/162.03  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.55/162.03  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.55/162.04  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.55/163.70  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_63dc1b1eb7d762c2f3686774d32795976f981b97 for 23 seconds:
% 1.55/163.70  
% 1.55/163.70  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.55/163.70  # OLD status Res
% 1.55/163.70  # Preprocessing time       : 1.574 s
% 1.55/163.70  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f6eb5f7f05126ea361481ae651a4823314e3d740 for 23 seconds:
% 1.55/163.70  
% 1.55/163.70  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.55/163.70  # OLD status Res
% 1.55/163.70  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,02,20000,1.0)
% 1.55/163.70  # Preprocessing time       : 0.273 s
% 1.55/163.70  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_a172c605141d0894bf6fdc293a5220c6c2a32117 for 23 seconds:
% 1.55/163.70  
% 1.55/163.70  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.55/163.70  # OLD status Res
% 1.55/163.70  # Preprocessing time       : 1.544 s
% 1.55/163.70  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f8b0f932169414d689b89e2a8b18d4600533b975 for 23 seconds:
% 1.55/163.70  
% 1.55/163.70  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.55/163.70  # OLD status Res
% 1.55/163.70  # Preprocessing time       : 1.522 s
% 1.55/163.70  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_fc511518e5f98a6b2c7baef820b71b6d1abb3e55 for 23 seconds:
% 1.55/163.70  
% 1.55/163.70  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.55/163.70  # OLD status Res
% 1.55/163.70  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,02,80,1.0)
% 1.55/163.70  # Preprocessing time       : 0.381 s
% 1.55/163.70  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_95b56b3f38545d2cfee43b45856d192a814b65d5 for 23 seconds:
% 1.55/163.70  
% 1.55/163.70  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.55/163.70  # OLD status Res
% 1.55/163.70  # Preprocessing time       : 1.578 s
% 1.55/163.70  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_6017f334107ca4679a9978dd19d7c76a8bd36e48 for 23 seconds:
% 1.55/163.70  
% 1.55/163.70  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.55/163.70  # OLD status Res
% 1.55/163.70  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,1.4,,02,20000,1.0)
% 1.55/163.70  # Preprocessing time       : 0.283 s
% 1.55/163.70  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29f46a864b4eba32a7d0333eeab34cc2a3bfeeb2 for 23 seconds:
% 1.55/163.70  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,04,500,1.0)
% 1.55/163.70  # Preprocessing time       : 0.248 s
% 1.55/163.70  
% 1.55/163.70  # Proof found!
% 1.55/163.70  # SZS status Theorem
% 1.55/163.70  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.55/163.70  # Proof object total steps             : 50
% 1.55/163.70  # Proof object clause steps            : 29
% 1.55/163.70  # Proof object formula steps           : 21
% 1.55/163.70  # Proof object conjectures             : 23
% 1.55/163.70  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 20
% 1.55/163.70  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 1.55/163.70  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 19
% 1.55/163.70  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 10
% 1.55/163.70  # Proof object generating inferences   : 10
% 1.55/163.70  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 27
% 1.55/163.70  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.55/163.70  # Parsed axioms                        : 8950
% 1.55/163.70  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 8449
% 1.55/163.70  # Initial clauses                      : 1100
% 1.55/163.70  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 51
% 1.55/163.70  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 1049
% 1.55/163.70  # Processed clauses                    : 2388
% 1.55/163.70  # ...of these trivial                  : 74
% 1.55/163.70  # ...subsumed                          : 461
% 1.55/163.70  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1853
% 1.55/163.70  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 38
% 1.55/163.70  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.55/163.70  # Backward-subsumed                    : 5
% 1.55/163.70  # Backward-rewritten                   : 92
% 1.55/163.70  # Generated clauses                    : 20322
% 1.55/163.70  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 19357
% 1.55/163.70  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.55/163.70  # Paramodulations                      : 20207
% 1.55/163.70  # Factorizations                       : 26
% 1.55/163.70  # Equation resolutions                 : 77
% 1.55/163.70  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1738
% 1.55/163.70  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 598
% 1.55/163.70  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 8
% 1.55/163.70  #    Negative unit clauses             : 100
% 1.55/163.70  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1032
% 1.55/163.70  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17127
% 1.55/163.70  # ...number of literals in the above   : 62720
% 1.55/163.70  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.55/163.70  # Current number of archived clauses   : 106
% 1.55/163.70  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 84824
% 1.55/163.70  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 36764
% 1.55/163.70  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 292
% 1.55/163.70  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 70613
% 1.55/163.70  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 10
% 1.55/163.70  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1384
% 1.55/163.70  # BW rewrite match successes           : 41
% 1.55/163.70  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.55/163.70  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.55/163.70  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 799738
% 1.55/163.70  
% 1.55/163.70  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.55/163.70  # User time                : 0.715 s
% 1.55/163.70  # System time              : 0.022 s
% 1.55/163.70  # Total time               : 0.737 s
% 1.55/163.70  # Maximum resident set size: 43488 pages
% 1.55/185.04  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.55/185.05  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.55/185.06  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.55/185.06  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.55/185.06  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.55/185.07  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.55/185.07  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.55/185.07  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.55/185.07  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.55/185.07  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.55/185.07  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.55/185.07  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.55/185.07  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.55/185.08  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.55/185.08  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.55/185.08  eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.pCannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.55/185.08  
% 1.55/185.08  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.55/185.08  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.55/185.08  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.55/185.08  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.55/185.08  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.55/185.08  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.55/185.09  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.55/185.09  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.55/185.09  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.55/185.09  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------