TSTP Solution File: LAT340+4 by nanoCoP---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : nanoCoP---2.0
% Problem : LAT340+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 19 11:28:53 EDT 2023
% Result : Unknown 157.23s 154.85s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : LAT340+4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : nanocop.sh %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu May 18 14:33:58 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 10.59/10.44 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 10.59/10.44 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 10.59/10.44 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 22.17/21.79 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 22.17/21.79 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 22.17/21.79 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 34.89/34.40 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 34.89/34.40 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 34.89/34.40 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 46.58/45.81 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 46.58/45.81 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 46.58/45.81 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 54.79/53.95 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 54.79/53.95 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 54.79/53.95 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 64.28/63.37 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 64.28/63.37 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 64.28/63.37 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 77.01/75.87 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 77.01/75.87 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 77.01/75.87 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 89.52/88.20 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 89.52/88.20 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 89.52/88.20 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 106.01/104.38 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 106.01/104.38 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 106.01/104.38 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 157.15/154.26 *** Overflow of the global/trail stack in spite of garbage collection!
% 157.15/154.26 You can use the "-g kBytes" (GLOBALSIZE) option to have a larger stack.
% 157.15/154.26 Peak sizes were: global stack 128024 kbytes, trail stack 4200 kbytes
% 157.23/154.85 Timeout
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------