TSTP Solution File: LAT336+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LAT336+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:47:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.97s 1.23s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.13 % Problem : LAT336+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.09/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 12:18:28 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.41 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.21/0.41 The process was started by sandbox on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.21/0.41 Thu Jun 30 12:18:28 2022
% 0.21/0.41 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 22945.
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.21/0.41 set(auto).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.21/0.41 clear(print_given).
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 formula_list(usable).
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=12.
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.21/0.41 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.21/0.41 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.21/0.41 clauses in usable.
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.21/0.41 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 ------------> process usable:
% 0.21/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 79 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v4_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u2_lattices(A)).
% 0.21/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 80 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v4_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u2_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.21/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 85 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -v1_relat_1(A)| -v1_funct_1(A)|v1_relat_1(k1_realset1(A,B)).
% 0.21/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 79 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v5_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u2_lattices(A)).
% 0.21/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 80 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v5_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u2_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.21/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 53 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v1_xboole_0(A)| -v1_funct_1(B)| -v1_funct_2(B,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -m1_relset_1(B,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -v1_funct_1(C)| -v1_funct_2(C,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -m1_relset_1(C,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)|v3_lattices(g3_lattices(A,B,C)).
% 0.21/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 92 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -v1_xboole_0(k1_tarski(A)).
% 0.21/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 64 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -v1_relat_1(A)| -v1_funct_1(A)|v1_relat_1(k7_relat_1(A,B)).
% 0.21/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 76 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v6_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u1_lattices(A)).
% 0.21/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 77 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v6_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u1_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.21/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 76 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v7_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u1_lattices(A)).
% 0.21/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 77 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v7_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u1_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 ------------> process sos:
% 0.21/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 233 during input processing: 0 [copy,233,flip.1] {-} k2_tarski(A,B)=k2_tarski(B,A).
% 0.21/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 299 during input processing: 0 [copy,299,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.21/0.41 299 back subsumes 224.
% 0.21/0.41 299 back subsumes 217.
% 0.21/0.41 299 back subsumes 183.
% 0.21/0.41 299 back subsumes 182.
% 0.21/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 234 during input processing: 0 [copy,300,flip.1] {-} k4_tarski(A,B)=k2_tarski(k2_tarski(A,B),k1_tarski(A)).
% 0.21/0.41
% 0.21/0.41 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.97/1.17
% 0.97/1.17 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.97/1.17
% 0.97/1.17
% 0.97/1.17 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.97/1.17
% 0.97/1.17
% 0.97/1.17
% 0.97/1.17 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.97/1.17
% 0.97/1.17 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.97/1.17 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.97/1.17 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.97/1.17 number of clauses in intial UL: 213
% 0.97/1.17 number of clauses initially in problem: 287
% 0.97/1.17 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 74
% 0.97/1.17 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 86
% 0.97/1.17 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.97/1.17 absolute distinct symbol count: 104
% 0.97/1.17 distinct predicate count: 40
% 0.97/1.17 distinct function count: 44
% 0.97/1.17 distinct constant count: 20
% 0.97/1.17
% 0.97/1.17 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.97/1.17
% 0.97/1.17
% 0.97/1.17
% 0.97/1.17 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.97/1.23
% 0.97/1.23 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.97/1.23 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.97/1.23 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.97/1.23 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.97/1.23
% 0.97/1.23
% 0.97/1.23 SEGMENTATION FAULT!! This is probably caused by a
% 0.97/1.23 bug in Otter. Please send copy of the input file to
% 0.97/1.23 otter@mcs.anl.gov, let us know what version of Otter you are
% 0.97/1.23 using, and send any other info that might be useful.
% 0.97/1.23
% 0.97/1.23
% 0.97/1.23 The job finished Thu Jun 30 12:18:28 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------