TSTP Solution File: LAT318+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LAT318+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:47:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.69s 0.89s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : LAT318+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 01:59:17 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.40 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.40 The process was started by sandbox on n026.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.40 Wed Jun 29 01:59:17 2022
% 0.14/0.40 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 11204.
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.40 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.40 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 formula_list(usable).
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=13.
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.40 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.14/0.40 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.14/0.40 clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.40 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 34 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -l3_lattices(A)|v3_lattices(k1_lattice2(A)).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v4_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u2_lattices(A)).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 64 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v4_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u2_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v5_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u2_lattices(A)).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 64 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v5_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u2_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 30 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v1_xboole_0(A)| -v1_funct_1(B)| -v1_funct_2(B,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -m1_relset_1(B,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -v1_funct_1(C)| -v1_funct_2(C,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -m1_relset_1(C,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)|v3_lattices(g3_lattices(A,B,C)).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 79 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -v1_xboole_0(k1_tarski(A)).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 60 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v6_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u1_lattices(A)).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 61 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v6_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u1_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 60 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v7_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u1_lattices(A)).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 61 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v7_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u1_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -l3_lattices(A)| -v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(A)).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 34 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v10_lattices(A)| -l3_lattices(A)|v3_lattices(k1_lattice2(A)).
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 248 during input processing: 0 [copy,248,flip.1] {-} k2_tarski(A,B)=k2_tarski(B,A).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 249 during input processing: 0 [copy,249,flip.1] {-} k2_xboole_0(A,B)=k2_xboole_0(B,A).
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 294 during input processing: 0 [copy,294,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.40 294 back subsumes 239.
% 0.14/0.40 294 back subsumes 221.
% 0.14/0.40 294 back subsumes 220.
% 0.14/0.40 294 back subsumes 176.
% 0.14/0.40 294 back subsumes 175.
% 0.14/0.40 294 back subsumes 174.
% 0.14/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 250 during input processing: 0 [copy,295,flip.1] {-} k4_tarski(A,B)=k2_tarski(k2_tarski(A,B),k1_tarski(A)).
% 0.14/0.40
% 0.14/0.40 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.60/0.80 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.60/0.80 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.60/0.80 number of clauses in intial UL: 223
% 0.60/0.80 number of clauses initially in problem: 275
% 0.60/0.80 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 81
% 0.60/0.80 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 85
% 0.60/0.80 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.60/0.80 absolute distinct symbol count: 98
% 0.60/0.80 distinct predicate count: 34
% 0.60/0.80 distinct function count: 45
% 0.60/0.80 distinct constant count: 19
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80
% 0.60/0.80 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.69/0.88 k4_lattices($c18,$f4(u1_struct_0($c18)),$f4(u1_struct_0($c18)))=k2_lattices($c18,$f4(u1_struct_0($c18)),$f4(u1_struct_0($c18))).
% 0.69/0.88
% 0.69/0.88 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.69/0.88 77 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 2458.9 K.
% 0.69/0.88 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.69/0.88 sym_ent ( 304) 215 0 215 0 63.8 K
% 0.69/0.88 term ( 32) 208296 199173 9123 81 287.6 K
% 0.69/0.88 rel ( 40) 167156 153009 14147 16 553.2 K
% 0.69/0.88 term_ptr ( 16) 44048 2912 41136 0 642.8 K
% 0.69/0.88 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.69/0.88 fpa_head ( 24) 4852 312 4540 10 106.6 K
% 0.69/0.88 fpa_tree ( 56) 8443 8443 0 25 1.4 K
% 0.69/0.88 context (1288) 24592 24592 0 10 12.6 K
% 0.69/0.88 trail ( 24) 126315 126315 0 11 0.3 K
% 0.69/0.88 imd_tree ( 32) 194 8 186 0 5.8 K
% 0.69/0.88 imd_pos (4024) 253 253 0 3 11.8 K
% 0.69/0.88 is_tree ( 24) 5863 574 5289 2 124.0 K
% 0.69/0.88 is_pos (2424) 127982 127982 0 10 23.7 K
% 0.69/0.88 fsub_pos ( 16) 16091 16091 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.69/0.88 literal ( 32) 37763 31565 6198 4 193.8 K
% 0.69/0.88 clause ( 88) 5951 4498 1453 0 124.9 K
% 0.69/0.88 list ( 272) 149 142 7 2 2.4 K
% 0.69/0.88 clash_nd ( 80) 4332 4332 0 8 0.6 K
% 0.69/0.88 clause_ptr ( 16) 1399 140 1259 2 19.7 K
% 0.69/0.88 int_ptr ( 16) 17199 8774 8425 7 131.8 K
% 0.69/0.88 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.69/0.88 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.69/0.88 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.69/0.88 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.69/0.88 formula( 40) 2400 2400 0 1226 47.9 K
% 0.69/0.88 formula_ptr( 16) 139 139 0 139 2.2 K
% 0.69/0.88 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.69/0.88
% 0.69/0.88 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.69/0.88 0.00
% 0.69/0.88 post_process time 0.00
% 0.69/0.88 back demod time 0.00
% 0.69/0.88 back subsume 0.00
% 0.69/0.88 factor time 0.00
% 0.69/0.88 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.69/0.88 unindex time 0.00
% 0.69/0.88
% 0.69/0.88 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.69/0.88 1:0 2:0 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:5 7:0 8:0 9:0 10:0
% 0.69/0.88 11:0 12:0 13:4 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 0.69/0.88 21:0 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:1
% 0.69/0.88 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:2 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.69/0.88 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:0 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:0
% 0.69/0.88 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:0 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:2
% 0.69/0.88 61:2 62:0 63:2 64:2 65:0 66:0 67:0 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.69/0.88 71:0 72:1 73:0 74:1 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:0 79:2 80:1
% 0.69/0.88 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:2 87:1 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.69/0.88 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.69/0.88 All others: 1164.
% 0.69/0.88
% 0.69/0.88 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.69/0.88
% 0.69/0.88 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------