TSTP Solution File: LAT304+2 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : LAT304+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:29:14 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 10.74s 3.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 10.74s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   26 (   9 unt;  13 nHn;  26 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   74 (   2 equ;  39 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2143,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X1)
    | ~ m1_filter_2(X2,k1_lattice2(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5u1tuigj/lgb.p',i_0_2143) ).

cnf(i_0_1391,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | m1_filter_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X1)
    | ~ m1_filter_0(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5u1tuigj/lgb.p',i_0_1391) ).

cnf(i_0_835,plain,
    ( l3_lattices(k1_lattice2(X1))
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5u1tuigj/lgb.p',i_0_835) ).

cnf(i_0_1099,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | v10_lattices(k1_lattice2(X1))
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5u1tuigj/lgb.p',i_0_1099) ).

cnf(i_0_996,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1)
    | ~ v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5u1tuigj/lgb.p',i_0_996) ).

cnf(i_0_1870,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | m1_filter_0(u1_struct_0(X1),X1)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5u1tuigj/lgb.p',i_0_1870) ).

cnf(i_0_2048,plain,
    ( u1_struct_0(k1_lattice2(X1)) = u1_struct_0(X1)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5u1tuigj/lgb.p',i_0_2048) ).

cnf(i_0_2326,negated_conjecture,
    ~ m2_filter_2(u1_struct_0(esk406_0),esk406_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5u1tuigj/lgb.p',i_0_2326) ).

cnf(i_0_2328,negated_conjecture,
    v10_lattices(esk406_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5u1tuigj/lgb.p',i_0_2328) ).

cnf(i_0_2327,negated_conjecture,
    l3_lattices(esk406_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5u1tuigj/lgb.p',i_0_2327) ).

cnf(i_0_2329,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk406_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-5u1tuigj/lgb.p',i_0_2329) ).

cnf(c_0_2341,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X1)
    | ~ m1_filter_2(X2,k1_lattice2(X1)) ),
    i_0_2143 ).

cnf(c_0_2342,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | m1_filter_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X1)
    | ~ m1_filter_0(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_1391 ).

cnf(c_0_2343,plain,
    ( l3_lattices(k1_lattice2(X1))
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1) ),
    i_0_835 ).

cnf(c_0_2344,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | v10_lattices(k1_lattice2(X1))
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X1) ),
    i_0_1099 ).

cnf(c_0_2345,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1)
    | ~ v3_struct_0(k1_lattice2(X1)) ),
    i_0_996 ).

cnf(c_0_2346,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | m1_filter_0(u1_struct_0(X1),X1)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X1) ),
    i_0_1870 ).

cnf(c_0_2347,plain,
    ( u1_struct_0(k1_lattice2(X1)) = u1_struct_0(X1)
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1) ),
    i_0_2048 ).

cnf(c_0_2348,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | m2_filter_2(X2,X1)
    | ~ m1_filter_0(X2,k1_lattice2(X1))
    | ~ v10_lattices(X1)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2341,c_0_2342]),c_0_2343]),c_0_2344]),c_0_2345]) ).

cnf(c_0_2349,plain,
    ( m1_filter_0(u1_struct_0(X1),k1_lattice2(X1))
    | v3_struct_0(X1)
    | ~ v10_lattices(k1_lattice2(X1))
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2346,c_0_2347]),c_0_2343]),c_0_2345]) ).

cnf(c_0_2350,negated_conjecture,
    ~ m2_filter_2(u1_struct_0(esk406_0),esk406_0),
    i_0_2326 ).

cnf(c_0_2351,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | m2_filter_2(u1_struct_0(X1),X1)
    | ~ v10_lattices(X1)
    | ~ l3_lattices(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2348,c_0_2349]),c_0_2344]) ).

cnf(c_0_2352,negated_conjecture,
    v10_lattices(esk406_0),
    i_0_2328 ).

cnf(c_0_2353,negated_conjecture,
    l3_lattices(esk406_0),
    i_0_2327 ).

cnf(c_0_2354,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk406_0),
    i_0_2329 ).

cnf(c_0_2355,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2350,c_0_2351]),c_0_2352]),c_0_2353])]),c_0_2354]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : LAT304+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 10:49:56 EDT 2022
% 0.18/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.57  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.57  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.18/0.57  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.18/0.57  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 10.74/3.64  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 10.74/3.64  # No SInE strategy applied
% 10.74/3.64  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 10.74/3.64  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0Y
% 10.74/3.64  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 10.74/3.64  #
% 10.74/3.64  # Preprocessing time       : 0.027 s
% 10.74/3.64  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 10.74/3.64  
% 10.74/3.64  # Proof found!
% 10.74/3.64  # SZS status Theorem
% 10.74/3.64  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 10.74/3.64  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 10.74/3.64  
% 10.74/3.64  # -------------------------------------------------
% 10.74/3.64  # User time                : 0.179 s
% 10.74/3.64  # System time              : 0.016 s
% 10.74/3.64  # Total time               : 0.195 s
% 10.74/3.64  # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 10.74/3.64  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------