TSTP Solution File: LAT300+4 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : LAT300+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 04:29:09 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.78s 5.69s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.78s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 35 ( 16 unt; 7 nHn; 33 RR)
% Number of literals : 74 ( 5 equ; 37 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 11 ( 9 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_961,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m2_lattice4(X2,X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0d2q1sh5/lgb.p',i_0_961) ).
cnf(i_0_3532,negated_conjecture,
m2_filter_2(esk544_0,esk543_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0d2q1sh5/lgb.p',i_0_3532) ).
cnf(i_0_3534,negated_conjecture,
v10_lattices(esk543_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0d2q1sh5/lgb.p',i_0_3534) ).
cnf(i_0_3533,negated_conjecture,
l3_lattices(esk543_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0d2q1sh5/lgb.p',i_0_3533) ).
cnf(i_0_3535,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk543_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0d2q1sh5/lgb.p',i_0_3535) ).
cnf(i_0_966,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_lattice4(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0d2q1sh5/lgb.p',i_0_966) ).
cnf(i_0_4663,plain,
( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0d2q1sh5/lgb.p',i_0_4663) ).
cnf(i_0_595,plain,
( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3)
| ~ r1_tarski(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0d2q1sh5/lgb.p',i_0_595) ).
cnf(i_0_2842,plain,
( X1 = k1_xboole_0
| r2_hidden(esk470_1(X1),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0d2q1sh5/lgb.p',i_0_2842) ).
cnf(i_0_3531,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r2_hidden(X1,esk544_0)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,u1_struct_0(esk543_0)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0d2q1sh5/lgb.p',i_0_3531) ).
cnf(i_0_962,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0d2q1sh5/lgb.p',i_0_962) ).
cnf(i_0_2899,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0d2q1sh5/lgb.p',i_0_2899) ).
cnf(i_0_1189,plain,
v1_xboole_0(k1_xboole_0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-0d2q1sh5/lgb.p',i_0_1189) ).
cnf(c_0_4677,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m2_lattice4(X2,X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X2,X1) ),
i_0_961 ).
cnf(c_0_4678,negated_conjecture,
m2_filter_2(esk544_0,esk543_0),
i_0_3532 ).
cnf(c_0_4679,negated_conjecture,
v10_lattices(esk543_0),
i_0_3534 ).
cnf(c_0_4680,negated_conjecture,
l3_lattices(esk543_0),
i_0_3533 ).
cnf(c_0_4681,negated_conjecture,
~ v3_struct_0(esk543_0),
i_0_3535 ).
cnf(c_0_4682,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_lattice4(X2,X1) ),
i_0_966 ).
cnf(c_0_4683,negated_conjecture,
m2_lattice4(esk544_0,esk543_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4677,c_0_4678]),c_0_4679]),c_0_4680])]),c_0_4681]) ).
cnf(c_0_4684,plain,
( r1_tarski(X1,X2)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(X2)) ),
i_0_4663 ).
cnf(c_0_4685,negated_conjecture,
m1_subset_1(esk544_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk543_0))),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4682,c_0_4683]),c_0_4679]),c_0_4680])]),c_0_4681]) ).
cnf(c_0_4686,plain,
( r2_hidden(X1,X2)
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,X3)
| ~ r1_tarski(X3,X2) ),
i_0_595 ).
cnf(c_0_4687,plain,
r1_tarski(esk544_0,u1_struct_0(esk543_0)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4684,c_0_4685]) ).
cnf(c_0_4688,plain,
( r2_hidden(X1,u1_struct_0(esk543_0))
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,esk544_0) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4686,c_0_4687]) ).
cnf(c_0_4689,plain,
( X1 = k1_xboole_0
| r2_hidden(esk470_1(X1),X1) ),
i_0_2842 ).
cnf(c_0_4690,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r2_hidden(X1,esk544_0)
| ~ m1_subset_1(X1,u1_struct_0(esk543_0)) ),
i_0_3531 ).
cnf(c_0_4691,plain,
( v3_struct_0(X1)
| ~ l3_lattices(X1)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(X2)
| ~ v10_lattices(X1)
| ~ m2_filter_2(X2,X1) ),
i_0_962 ).
cnf(c_0_4692,plain,
( m1_subset_1(X1,X2)
| ~ r2_hidden(X1,X2) ),
i_0_2899 ).
cnf(c_0_4693,plain,
( esk544_0 = k1_xboole_0
| r2_hidden(esk470_1(esk544_0),u1_struct_0(esk543_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4688,c_0_4689]) ).
cnf(c_0_4694,negated_conjecture,
( esk544_0 = k1_xboole_0
| ~ m1_subset_1(esk470_1(esk544_0),u1_struct_0(esk543_0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4690,c_0_4689]) ).
cnf(c_0_4695,negated_conjecture,
~ v1_xboole_0(esk544_0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4691,c_0_4678]),c_0_4679]),c_0_4680])]),c_0_4681]) ).
cnf(c_0_4696,plain,
esk544_0 = k1_xboole_0,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4692,c_0_4693]),c_0_4694]) ).
cnf(c_0_4697,plain,
v1_xboole_0(k1_xboole_0),
i_0_1189 ).
cnf(c_0_4698,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4695,c_0_4696]),c_0_4697])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : LAT300+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Jun 28 22:56:29 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 1.22/1.42 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.22/1.42 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 1.22/1.42 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 1.22/1.42 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.78/5.69 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 8.78/5.69 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.78/5.69 # Trying AutoSched0 for 149 seconds
% 8.78/5.69 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d
% 8.78/5.69 # and selection function SelectCQIPrecWNTNp.
% 8.78/5.69 #
% 8.78/5.69 # Preprocessing time : 0.037 s
% 8.78/5.69 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.78/5.69
% 8.78/5.69 # Proof found!
% 8.78/5.69 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.78/5.69 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.78/5.69 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.78/5.69
% 8.78/5.69 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.78/5.69 # User time : 0.186 s
% 8.78/5.69 # System time : 0.015 s
% 8.78/5.69 # Total time : 0.201 s
% 8.78/5.69 # Maximum resident set size: 7128 pages
% 8.78/5.69
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------