TSTP Solution File: LAT300+1 by SATCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem : LAT300+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : satcop --statistics %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:40:11 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.37s
% Output : Proof 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
~ v3_struct_0(sK0),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t24_filter_2)]) ).
cnf(g1,plain,
v10_lattices(sK0),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t24_filter_2)]) ).
cnf(g2,plain,
l3_lattices(sK0),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t24_filter_2)]) ).
cnf(g3,plain,
m2_filter_2(sK1,sK0),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t24_filter_2)]) ).
cnf(g4,plain,
( ~ l3_lattices(sK0)
| l2_lattices(sK0) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_l3_lattices)]) ).
cnf(g5,plain,
( ~ v10_lattices(sK0)
| ~ l3_lattices(sK0)
| ~ m2_filter_2(sK1,sK0)
| v3_struct_0(sK0)
| m2_lattice4(sK1,sK0) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_m2_filter_2)]) ).
cnf(g6,plain,
( ~ v10_lattices(sK0)
| ~ l3_lattices(sK0)
| ~ m2_filter_2(sK1,sK0)
| ~ v1_xboole_0(sK1)
| v3_struct_0(sK0) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_m2_filter_2)]) ).
cnf(g7,plain,
( ~ l2_lattices(sK0)
| l1_struct_0(sK0) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_l2_lattices)]) ).
cnf(g8,plain,
( ~ v10_lattices(sK0)
| ~ l3_lattices(sK0)
| ~ m2_lattice4(sK1,sK0)
| v3_struct_0(sK0)
| m1_subset_1(sK1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(sK0))) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_m2_lattice4)]) ).
cnf(g9,plain,
( ~ m1_subset_1(sK7(sK1),u1_struct_0(sK0))
| ~ r2_hidden(sK7(sK1),sK1) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t24_filter_2)]) ).
cnf(g10,plain,
( ~ m1_subset_1(sK7(sK1),sK1)
| r2_hidden(sK7(sK1),sK1)
| v1_xboole_0(sK1) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_subset)]) ).
cnf(g11,plain,
m1_subset_1(sK7(sK1),sK1),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',existence_m1_subset_1)]) ).
cnf(g12,plain,
( ~ m1_subset_1(sK1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(sK0)))
| ~ m1_subset_1(sK7(sK1),sK1)
| ~ l1_struct_0(sK0)
| v3_struct_0(sK0)
| v1_xboole_0(sK1)
| m1_struct_0(sK7(sK1),sK0,sK1) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',redefinition_m1_struct_0)]) ).
cnf(g13,plain,
( ~ m1_subset_1(sK1,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(sK0)))
| ~ l1_struct_0(sK0)
| ~ m1_struct_0(sK7(sK1),sK0,sK1)
| v3_struct_0(sK0)
| m1_subset_1(sK7(sK1),u1_struct_0(sK0))
| v1_xboole_0(sK1) ),
inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dt_m1_struct_0)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : LAT300+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 14:27:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 % symbols: 42
% 0.12/0.37 % clauses: 90
% 0.12/0.37 % start clauses: 5
% 0.12/0.37 % iterative deepening steps: 147
% 0.12/0.37 % maximum path limit: 2
% 0.12/0.37 % literal attempts: 54201
% 0.12/0.37 % depth failures: 41398
% 0.12/0.37 % regularity failures: 1139
% 0.12/0.37 % tautology failures: 405
% 0.12/0.37 % reductions: 16
% 0.12/0.37 % extensions: 53518
% 0.12/0.37 % SAT variables: 3579
% 0.12/0.37 % SAT clauses: 5399
% 0.12/0.37 % WalkSAT solutions: 5396
% 0.12/0.37 % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.12/0.37 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.37 % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------