TSTP Solution File: LAT298+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : LAT298+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:46:57 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.85s 1.07s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11 % Problem : LAT298+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.11 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.32 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.32 % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 08:49:59 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n028.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Thu Jun 30 08:49:59 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 20007.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=11.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.35 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.35 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.35 clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 48 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v4_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u2_lattices(A)).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 49 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v4_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u2_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 48 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v5_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u2_lattices(A)).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 49 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v5_lattices(A)| -l2_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u2_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 30 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v1_xboole_0(A)| -v1_funct_1(B)| -v1_funct_2(B,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -m1_relset_1(B,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -v1_funct_1(C)| -v1_funct_2(C,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)| -m1_relset_1(C,k2_zfmisc_1(A,A),A)|v3_lattices(g3_lattices(A,B,C)).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 59 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -v1_xboole_0(k1_tarski(A)).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 45 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v6_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u1_lattices(A)).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v6_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u1_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 45 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v7_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_1(u1_lattices(A)).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [] {-} v3_struct_0(A)| -v7_lattices(A)| -l1_lattices(A)|v1_funct_2(u1_lattices(A),k2_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(A),u1_struct_0(A)),u1_struct_0(A)).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 129 during input processing: 0 [copy,129,flip.1] {-} k2_tarski(A,B)=k2_tarski(B,A).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 169 during input processing: 0 [copy,169,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.35 169 back subsumes 121.
% 0.12/0.35 169 back subsumes 103.
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 130 during input processing: 0 [copy,170,flip.1] {-} k4_tarski(A,B)=k2_tarski(k2_tarski(A,B),k1_tarski(A)).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.66/0.86
% 0.66/0.86 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.66/0.86
% 0.66/0.86
% 0.66/0.86 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.66/0.86
% 0.66/0.86
% 0.66/0.86
% 0.66/0.86 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.66/0.86
% 0.66/0.86 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.66/0.86 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.66/0.86 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.66/0.86 number of clauses in intial UL: 117
% 0.66/0.86 number of clauses initially in problem: 166
% 0.66/0.86 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 70
% 0.66/0.86 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 81
% 0.66/0.86 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 99
% 0.66/0.86 absolute distinct symbol count: 77
% 0.66/0.86 distinct predicate count: 32
% 0.66/0.86 distinct function count: 26
% 0.66/0.86 distinct constant count: 19
% 0.66/0.86
% 0.66/0.86 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.66/0.86
% 0.66/0.86
% 0.66/0.86
% 0.66/0.86 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.85/1.07 k4_lattices($c18,$f6(u1_struct_0($c18)),$f6(u1_struct_0($c18)))=k2_lattices($c18,$f6(u1_struct_0($c18)),$f6(u1_struct_0($c18))).
% 0.85/1.07
% 0.85/1.07 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.85/1.07 81 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 2586.6 K.
% 0.85/1.07 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.85/1.07 sym_ent ( 304) 193 0 193 0 57.3 K
% 0.85/1.07 term ( 32) 515125 506128 8997 38 282.3 K
% 0.85/1.07 rel ( 40) 421428 404760 16668 16 651.7 K
% 0.85/1.07 term_ptr ( 16) 49415 1815 47600 0 743.8 K
% 0.85/1.07 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.85/1.07 fpa_head ( 24) 3012 74 2938 10 69.1 K
% 0.85/1.07 fpa_tree ( 56) 4699 4699 0 17 0.9 K
% 0.85/1.07 context (1288) 38334 38334 0 9 11.3 K
% 0.85/1.07 trail ( 24) 407162 407162 0 9 0.2 K
% 0.85/1.07 imd_tree ( 32) 96 7 89 0 2.8 K
% 0.85/1.07 imd_pos (4024) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.85/1.07 is_tree ( 24) 4661 266 4395 2 103.1 K
% 0.85/1.07 is_pos (2424) 268847 268847 0 9 21.3 K
% 0.85/1.07 fsub_pos ( 16) 25033 25033 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.85/1.07 literal ( 32) 89322 82162 7160 2 223.8 K
% 0.85/1.07 clause ( 88) 12576 11158 1418 0 121.9 K
% 0.85/1.07 list ( 272) 102 95 7 2 2.4 K
% 0.85/1.07 clash_nd ( 80) 2018 2018 0 7 0.5 K
% 0.85/1.07 clause_ptr ( 16) 1359 84 1275 2 20.0 K
% 0.85/1.07 int_ptr ( 16) 26985 16392 10593 7 165.6 K
% 0.85/1.07 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.85/1.07 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.85/1.07 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.85/1.07 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.85/1.07 formula( 40) 1351 1351 0 673 26.3 K
% 0.85/1.07 formula_ptr( 16) 92 92 0 92 1.4 K
% 0.85/1.07 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.85/1.07
% 0.85/1.07 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.85/1.07 0.00
% 0.85/1.07 post_process time 0.00
% 0.85/1.07 back demod time 0.00
% 0.85/1.07 back subsume 0.00
% 0.85/1.07 factor time 0.00
% 0.85/1.07 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.85/1.07 unindex time 0.00
% 0.85/1.07
% 0.85/1.07 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.85/1.07 1:0 2:0 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:0 7:5 8:0 9:0 10:0
% 0.85/1.07 11:0 12:0 13:0 14:4 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 0.85/1.07 21:0 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:1
% 0.85/1.07 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.85/1.07 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:2 46:2 47:0 48:2 49:2 50:0
% 0.85/1.07 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:1 56:0 57:0 58:0 59:2 60:0
% 0.85/1.07 61:0 62:0 63:0 64:2 65:0 66:0 67:0 68:0 69:0 70:0
% 0.85/1.07 71:0 72:0 73:0 74:0 75:0 76:0 77:0 78:1 79:0 80:0
% 0.85/1.07 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.85/1.07 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:1
% 0.85/1.07 All others: 1888.
% 0.85/1.07
% 0.85/1.07 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.85/1.07
% 0.85/1.07 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------