TSTP Solution File: LAT271-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : LAT271-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 08:16:29 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.58s 0.95s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Tarski_O_91_124_AS1_A_60_61_Ainterval_Ar_Aa1_Ab1_59_Ax1_A_58_AS1_A_124_93_A_61_61_62_A_Ia1_M_Ax1_J_A_58_Ar_A_61_61_ATrue_0,axiom,
( c_in(c_Pair(X5,X1,X3,X3),X4,tc_prod(X3,X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ c_lessequals(X2,c_Tarski_Ointerval(X4,X5,X6,X3),tc_set(X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YTeEbPRyqn/E---3.1_11561.p',cls_Tarski_O_91_124_AS1_A_60_61_Ainterval_Ar_Aa1_Ab1_59_Ax1_A_58_AS1_A_124_93_A_61_61_62_A_Ia1_M_Ax1_J_A_58_Ar_A_61_61_ATrue_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_x,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YTeEbPRyqn/E---3.1_11561.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,v_a,v_b,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YTeEbPRyqn/E---3.1_11561.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_x,v_S,t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YTeEbPRyqn/E---3.1_11561.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( c_in(c_Pair(X5,X1,X3,X3),X4,tc_prod(X3,X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ c_lessequals(X2,c_Tarski_Ointerval(X4,X5,X6,X3),tc_set(X3)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Tarski_O_91_124_AS1_A_60_61_Ainterval_Ar_Aa1_Ab1_59_Ax1_A_58_AS1_A_124_93_A_61_61_62_A_Ia1_M_Ax1_J_A_58_Ar_A_61_61_ATrue_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_x,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( c_in(c_Pair(X5,X1,X3,X3),X4,tc_prod(X3,X3))
| ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ c_lessequals(X2,c_Tarski_Ointerval(X4,X5,X6,X3),tc_set(X3)) ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Ointerval(v_r,v_a,v_b,t_a),tc_set(t_a)),
cls_conjecture_2 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(c_Pair(v_a,v_x,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( c_in(c_Pair(v_a,X1,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
| ~ c_in(X1,v_S,t_a) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c_in(v_x,v_S,t_a),
cls_conjecture_6 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.01/0.12 % Problem : LAT271-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 08:16:03 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.54/0.75 Running first-order model finding
% 0.54/0.75 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.YTeEbPRyqn/E---3.1_11561.p
% 0.58/0.95 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.58/0.95 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.58/0.95 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.58/0.95 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.58/0.95 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.95 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.95 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.95 # new_bool_3 with pid 11668 completed with status 0
% 0.58/0.95 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.58/0.95 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.58/0.95 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.58/0.95 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.58/0.95 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.95 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.58/0.95 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.58/0.95 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.58/0.95 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.95 # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 11671 completed with status 0
% 0.58/0.95 # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 0.58/0.95 # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.58/0.95 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.58/0.95 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.58/0.95 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.95 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.58/0.95 # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 0.58/0.95 # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.58/0.95 # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 0.58/0.95 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 0.58/0.95
% 0.58/0.95 # Proof found!
% 0.58/0.95 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.58/0.95 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.58/0.95 # Parsed axioms : 2759
% 0.58/0.95 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 2271
% 0.58/0.95 # Initial clauses : 488
% 0.58/0.95 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.58/0.95 # Initial clauses in saturation : 488
% 0.58/0.95 # Processed clauses : 623
% 0.58/0.95 # ...of these trivial : 12
% 0.58/0.95 # ...subsumed : 99
% 0.58/0.95 # ...remaining for further processing : 512
% 0.58/0.95 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.58/0.95 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.58/0.95 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.58/0.95 # Backward-rewritten : 7
% 0.58/0.95 # Generated clauses : 2869
% 0.58/0.95 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2217
% 0.58/0.95 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.58/0.95 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.58/0.95 # Paramodulations : 2848
% 0.58/0.95 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.58/0.95 # NegExts : 0
% 0.58/0.95 # Equation resolutions : 21
% 0.58/0.95 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.58/0.95 # Total rewrite steps : 893
% 0.58/0.95 # ...of those cached : 736
% 0.58/0.95 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.58/0.95 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.58/0.95 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.58/0.95 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.58/0.95 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.58/0.95 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.58/0.95 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.58/0.95 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.58/0.95 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.58/0.95 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.58/0.95 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.58/0.95 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.58/0.95 # Current number of processed clauses : 501
% 0.58/0.95 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 69
% 0.58/0.95 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.58/0.95 # Negative unit clauses : 28
% 0.58/0.95 # Non-unit-clauses : 402
% 0.58/0.95 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2076
% 0.58/0.95 # ...number of literals in the above : 9285
% 0.58/0.95 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.58/0.95 # Current number of archived clauses : 11
% 0.58/0.95 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 55257
% 0.58/0.95 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13237
% 0.58/0.95 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 36
% 0.58/0.95 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2593
% 0.58/0.95 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.58/0.95 # BW rewrite match attempts : 36
% 0.58/0.95 # BW rewrite match successes : 7
% 0.58/0.95 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.58/0.95 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.58/0.95 # Termbank termtop insertions : 90969
% 0.58/0.95 # Search garbage collected termcells : 7296
% 0.58/0.95
% 0.58/0.95 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.95 # User time : 0.136 s
% 0.58/0.95 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.58/0.95 # Total time : 0.143 s
% 0.58/0.95 # Maximum resident set size: 4464 pages
% 0.58/0.95
% 0.58/0.95 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.58/0.95 # User time : 0.182 s
% 0.58/0.95 # System time : 0.010 s
% 0.58/0.95 # Total time : 0.192 s
% 0.58/0.95 # Maximum resident set size: 3524 pages
% 0.58/0.95 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------