TSTP Solution File: LAT268-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : LAT268-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:24:10 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 18.53s 2.93s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 18.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   28 (  20 unt;   0 nHn;  24 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   49 (   8 equ;  24 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;   9 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_Tarski_O_Ix1_M_Ay1_J_A_58_Aorder_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_A_Iy1_M_Ax1_J_A_58_Aorder_Acl_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(X2,X1,X3,X3),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X4,X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(X3,X3))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X1,X2,X3,X3),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(c_Tarski_Odual(X4,X3),X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(X3,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT006-1.ax',cls_Tarski_O_Ix1_M_Ay1_J_A_58_Aorder_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_A_Iy1_M_Ax1_J_A_58_Aorder_Acl_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_OCL_Olub__upper_0,axiom,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(X1,c_Tarski_Olub(X2,X4,X3),X3,X3),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X4,X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(X3,X3))
    | ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ c_in(X4,c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | ~ c_in(X4,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X2,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X4,X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT006-1.ax',cls_Tarski_OCL_Olub__upper_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Oglb__dual__lub_0,axiom,
    c_Tarski_Oglb(X1,X2,X3) = c_Tarski_Olub(X1,c_Tarski_Odual(X2,X3),X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT006-1.ax',cls_Tarski_Oglb__dual__lub_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Opset_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0,axiom,
    c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(X1,X2),X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT006-1.ax',cls_Tarski_Opset_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Oglb(v_S,v_cl,t_a),v_x,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0,axiom,
    v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT006-1.ax',cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_OA_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0,axiom,
    v_A = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT006-1.ax',cls_Tarski_OA_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_ACompleteLattice_0,axiom,
    c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT006-1.ax',cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_ACompleteLattice_0) ).

cnf(cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_APartialOrder_0,axiom,
    c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/LAT006-1.ax',cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_APartialOrder_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(v_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_x,v_S,t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(X2,X1,X3,X3),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X4,X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(X3,X3))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X1,X2,X3,X3),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(c_Tarski_Odual(X4,X3),X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(X3,X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Tarski_O_Ix1_M_Ay1_J_A_58_Aorder_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_A_Iy1_M_Ax1_J_A_58_Aorder_Acl_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(X1,c_Tarski_Olub(X2,X4,X3),X3,X3),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X4,X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(X3,X3))
    | ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ c_in(X4,c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | ~ c_in(X4,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X2,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X4,X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_Tarski_OCL_Olub__upper_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(X2,X1,X3,X3),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X4,X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(X3,X3))
    | ~ c_in(c_Pair(X1,X2,X3,X3),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(c_Tarski_Odual(X4,X3),X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(X3,X3)) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(X1,c_Tarski_Olub(X2,X4,X3),X3,X3),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X4,X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(X3,X3))
    | ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ c_in(X4,c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | ~ c_in(X4,c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X2,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X4,X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(X3)) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    c_Tarski_Oglb(X1,X2,X3) = c_Tarski_Olub(X1,c_Tarski_Odual(X2,X3),X3),
    cls_Tarski_Oglb__dual__lub_0 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(X1,X2),X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X1,X2,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    cls_Tarski_Opset_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Oglb(v_S,v_cl,t_a),v_x,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Oglb(X1,X2,X3),X4,X3,X3),c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(X2,X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_prod(X3,X3))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X2,X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(X3))
    | ~ c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(X2,X3),c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | ~ c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(X2,X3),c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(X3,tc_Product__Type_Ounit))
    | ~ c_in(X4,X1,X3) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    v_r = c_Tarski_Opotype_Oorder(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    cls_Tarski_Or_A_61_61_Aorder_Acl_0 ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    v_A = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    cls_Tarski_OA_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0 ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OCompleteLattice,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_ACompleteLattice_0 ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    c_in(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),c_Tarski_OPartialOrder,tc_Tarski_Opotype_Opotype__ext__type(t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit)),
    cls_Tarski_Odual_Acl_A_58_APartialOrder_0 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Oglb(v_S,v_cl,t_a),v_x,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a)),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( c_in(c_Pair(c_Tarski_Oglb(X1,v_cl,t_a),X2,t_a,t_a),v_r,tc_prod(t_a,t_a))
    | ~ c_lessequals(X1,v_A,tc_set(t_a))
    | ~ c_in(X2,X1,t_a) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    c_lessequals(v_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a)),
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    c_in(v_x,v_S,t_a),
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem    : LAT268-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 19:42:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 18.53/2.93  # Version: 3.1.0
% 18.53/2.93  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 18.53/2.93  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 18.53/2.93  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 18.53/2.93  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 18.53/2.93  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 18.53/2.93  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 18.53/2.93  # new_bool_3 with pid 16020 completed with status 0
% 18.53/2.93  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 18.53/2.93  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 18.53/2.93  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 18.53/2.93  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 18.53/2.93  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 18.53/2.93  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 18.53/2.93  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 18.53/2.93  # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 18.53/2.93  # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 18.53/2.93  # G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with pid 16032 completed with status 0
% 18.53/2.93  # Result found by G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 18.53/2.93  # Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 18.53/2.93  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 18.53/2.93  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 18.53/2.93  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 18.53/2.93  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 18.53/2.93  # Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 18.53/2.93  # Scheduled 12 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 18.53/2.93  # Starting G-E--_303_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y with 25s (1) cores
% 18.53/2.93  # Preprocessing time       : 0.019 s
% 18.53/2.93  
% 18.53/2.93  # Proof found!
% 18.53/2.93  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 18.53/2.93  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 18.53/2.93  # Parsed axioms                        : 2752
% 18.53/2.93  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2290
% 18.53/2.93  # Initial clauses                      : 462
% 18.53/2.93  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 18.53/2.93  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 462
% 18.53/2.93  # Processed clauses                    : 6021
% 18.53/2.93  # ...of these trivial                  : 74
% 18.53/2.93  # ...subsumed                          : 3423
% 18.53/2.93  # ...remaining for further processing  : 2524
% 18.53/2.93  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 40
% 18.53/2.93  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 18.53/2.93  # Backward-subsumed                    : 86
% 18.53/2.93  # Backward-rewritten                   : 107
% 18.53/2.93  # Generated clauses                    : 89205
% 18.53/2.93  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 79784
% 18.53/2.93  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 18.53/2.93  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 103
% 18.53/2.93  # Paramodulations                      : 89108
% 18.53/2.93  # Factorizations                       : 10
% 18.53/2.93  # NegExts                              : 0
% 18.53/2.93  # Equation resolutions                 : 86
% 18.53/2.93  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 18.53/2.93  # Total rewrite steps                  : 49553
% 18.53/2.93  # ...of those cached                   : 45644
% 18.53/2.93  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 18.53/2.93  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 18.53/2.93  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 18.53/2.93  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 18.53/2.93  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 18.53/2.93  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 18.53/2.93  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 18.53/2.93  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 18.53/2.93  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 18.53/2.93  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 18.53/2.93  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 18.53/2.93  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 18.53/2.93  # Current number of processed clauses  : 2330
% 18.53/2.93  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 132
% 18.53/2.93  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 9
% 18.53/2.93  #    Negative unit clauses             : 168
% 18.53/2.93  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2021
% 18.53/2.93  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 74039
% 18.53/2.93  # ...number of literals in the above   : 350408
% 18.53/2.93  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 18.53/2.93  # Current number of archived clauses   : 194
% 18.53/2.93  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 789211
% 18.53/2.93  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 148805
% 18.53/2.93  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1311
% 18.53/2.93  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17503
% 18.53/2.93  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 18.53/2.93  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 332
% 18.53/2.93  # BW rewrite match successes           : 59
% 18.53/2.93  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 18.53/2.93  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 18.53/2.93  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 2388286
% 18.53/2.93  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 7261
% 18.53/2.93  
% 18.53/2.93  # -------------------------------------------------
% 18.53/2.93  # User time                : 2.270 s
% 18.53/2.93  # System time              : 0.064 s
% 18.53/2.93  # Total time               : 2.335 s
% 18.53/2.93  # Maximum resident set size: 4408 pages
% 18.53/2.93  
% 18.53/2.93  # -------------------------------------------------
% 18.53/2.93  # User time                : 2.324 s
% 18.53/2.93  # System time              : 0.068 s
% 18.53/2.93  # Total time               : 2.392 s
% 18.53/2.93  # Maximum resident set size: 3472 pages
% 18.53/2.93  % E---3.1 exiting
% 18.53/2.93  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------