TSTP Solution File: LAT262-2 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : LAT262-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:34:00 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.60s 0.77s
% Output : Refutation 0.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 8 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 8 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 2 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f8,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f7,f5]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
c_lessequals(v_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a)),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f1,f3]) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = v_A,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_OA_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f7,plain,
~ c_lessequals(v_S,v_A,tc_set(t_a)),
inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f6,f3]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
~ c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(v_cl,t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(t_a)),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f2,f4]) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(X0,X1),X1,tc_Product__Type_Ounit) = c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(X0,X1,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Tarski_Opset_A_Idual_Acl_J_A_61_61_Apset_Acl_0) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
~ c_lessequals(v_S,c_Tarski_Opotype_Opset(c_Tarski_Odual(v_cl,t_a),t_a,tc_Product__Type_Ounit),tc_set(t_a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : LAT262-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.15 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sun May 19 21:00:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN problem
% 0.15/0.37 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.60/0.77 % (6989)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (6990)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (6991)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (6992)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (6994)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (6993)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (6989)First to succeed.
% 0.60/0.77 % (6992)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.77 % (6990)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.77 % (6991)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (6991)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77 % (6991)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.77 % (6987)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.60/0.77 % (6994)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (6994)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77 % (6994)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.77 % (6994)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.60/0.77
% 0.60/0.77 % (6994)Memory used [KB]: 948
% 0.60/0.77 % (6994)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.60/0.77 % (6994)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.60/0.77 % (6991)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.60/0.77
% 0.60/0.77 % (6991)Memory used [KB]: 948
% 0.60/0.77 % (6991)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.60/0.77 % (6993)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.60/0.77 % (6989)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-6986"
% 0.60/0.77 % (6991)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.60/0.77 % (6994)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77 % (6994)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77 % (6991)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77 % (6991)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77 % (6989)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.60/0.77 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.60/0.77 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.60/0.77 % (6989)------------------------------
% 0.60/0.77 % (6989)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.60/0.77 % (6989)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.60/0.77
% 0.60/0.77 % (6989)Memory used [KB]: 963
% 0.60/0.77 % (6989)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.60/0.77 % (6989)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.60/0.77 % (6986)Success in time 0.39 s
% 0.60/0.77 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------