TSTP Solution File: LAT094-1 by Bliksem---1.12

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem  : LAT094-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : bliksem %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:48:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.01s 300.42s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : LAT094-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.07/0.11  % Command  : bliksem %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 00:21:12 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 216.26/216.65  *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 216.26/216.65  *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 216.26/216.65  *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 216.26/216.65  Bliksem 1.12
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Automatic Strategy Selection
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Clauses:
% 216.26/216.65  [
% 216.26/216.65     [ =( join( meet( join( meet( X, Y ), meet( Y, join( X, Y ) ) ), Z ), 
% 216.26/216.65    meet( join( meet( X, join( join( meet( Y, T ), meet( U, Y ) ), Y ) ), 
% 216.26/216.65    meet( join( meet( Y, meet( meet( join( Y, T ), join( U, Y ) ), Y ) ), 
% 216.26/216.65    meet( W, join( Y, meet( meet( join( Y, T ), join( U, Y ) ), Y ) ) ) ), 
% 216.26/216.65    join( X, join( join( meet( Y, T ), meet( U, Y ) ), Y ) ) ) ), join( join( 
% 216.26/216.65    meet( X, Y ), meet( Y, join( X, Y ) ) ), Z ) ) ), Y ) ],
% 216.26/216.65     [ ~( =( join( a, a ), a ) ) ]
% 216.26/216.65  ] .
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  percentage equality = 1.000000, percentage horn = 1.000000
% 216.26/216.65  This is a pure equality problem
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Options Used:
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  useres =            1
% 216.26/216.65  useparamod =        1
% 216.26/216.65  useeqrefl =         1
% 216.26/216.65  useeqfact =         1
% 216.26/216.65  usefactor =         1
% 216.26/216.65  usesimpsplitting =  0
% 216.26/216.65  usesimpdemod =      5
% 216.26/216.65  usesimpres =        3
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  resimpinuse      =  1000
% 216.26/216.65  resimpclauses =     20000
% 216.26/216.65  substype =          eqrewr
% 216.26/216.65  backwardsubs =      1
% 216.26/216.65  selectoldest =      5
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  litorderings [0] =  split
% 216.26/216.65  litorderings [1] =  extend the termordering, first sorting on arguments
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  termordering =      kbo
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  litapriori =        0
% 216.26/216.65  termapriori =       1
% 216.26/216.65  litaposteriori =    0
% 216.26/216.65  termaposteriori =   0
% 216.26/216.65  demodaposteriori =  0
% 216.26/216.65  ordereqreflfact =   0
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  litselect =         negord
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  maxweight =         15
% 216.26/216.65  maxdepth =          30000
% 216.26/216.65  maxlength =         115
% 216.26/216.65  maxnrvars =         195
% 216.26/216.65  excuselevel =       1
% 216.26/216.65  increasemaxweight = 1
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  maxselected =       10000000
% 216.26/216.65  maxnrclauses =      10000000
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  showgenerated =    0
% 216.26/216.65  showkept =         0
% 216.26/216.65  showselected =     0
% 216.26/216.65  showdeleted =      0
% 216.26/216.65  showresimp =       1
% 216.26/216.65  showstatus =       2000
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  prologoutput =     1
% 216.26/216.65  nrgoals =          5000000
% 216.26/216.65  totalproof =       1
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  {}  [0, 0]      (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 216.26/216.65  .  [1, 2]      (w:1, o:21, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 216.26/216.65  !  [4, 1]      (w:0, o:16, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 216.26/216.65  =  [13, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 216.26/216.65  ==>  [14, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 216.26/216.65  meet  [41, 2]      (w:1, o:46, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 216.26/216.65  join  [42, 2]      (w:1, o:47, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 216.26/216.65  a  [47, 0]      (w:1, o:15, a:1, s:1, b:0).
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Starting Search:
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Resimplifying inuse:
% 216.26/216.65  Done
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Failed to find proof!
% 216.26/216.65  maxweight =   15
% 216.26/216.65  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 216.26/216.65  Generated: 2988
% 216.26/216.65  Kept: 7
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  The strategy used was not complete!
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Increased maxweight to 16
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Starting Search:
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Resimplifying inuse:
% 216.26/216.65  Done
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Failed to find proof!
% 216.26/216.65  maxweight =   16
% 216.26/216.65  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 216.26/216.65  Generated: 2988
% 216.26/216.65  Kept: 7
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  The strategy used was not complete!
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Increased maxweight to 17
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Starting Search:
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Resimplifying inuse:
% 216.26/216.65  Done
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Failed to find proof!
% 216.26/216.65  maxweight =   17
% 216.26/216.65  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 216.26/216.65  Generated: 2988
% 216.26/216.65  Kept: 7
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  The strategy used was not complete!
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Increased maxweight to 18
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Starting Search:
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Resimplifying inuse:
% 216.26/216.65  Done
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Failed to find proof!
% 216.26/216.65  maxweight =   18
% 216.26/216.65  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 216.26/216.65  Generated: 2988
% 216.26/216.65  Kept: 7
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  The strategy used was not complete!
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Increased maxweight to 19
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Starting Search:
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Resimplifying inuse:
% 216.26/216.65  Done
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Failed to find proof!
% 216.26/216.65  maxweight =   19
% 216.26/216.65  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 216.26/216.65  Generated: 2988
% 216.26/216.65  Kept: 7
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  The strategy used was not complete!
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Increased maxweight to 20
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Starting Search:
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Resimplifying inuse:
% 216.26/216.65  Done
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Failed to find proof!
% 216.26/216.65  maxweight =   20
% 216.26/216.65  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 216.26/216.65  Generated: 2988
% 216.26/216.65  Kept: 7
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  The strategy used was not complete!
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Increased maxweight to 21
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Starting Search:
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Resimplifying inuse:
% 216.26/216.65  Done
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Failed to find proof!
% 216.26/216.65  maxweight =   21
% 216.26/216.65  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 216.26/216.65  Generated: 2988
% 216.26/216.65  Kept: 7
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  The strategy used was not complete!
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Increased maxweight to 22
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Starting Search:
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Resimplifying inuse:
% 216.26/216.65  Done
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Failed to find proof!
% 216.26/216.65  maxweight =   22
% 216.26/216.65  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 216.26/216.65  Generated: 2988
% 216.26/216.65  Kept: 7
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  The strategy used was not complete!
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Increased maxweight to 23
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Starting Search:
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Resimplifying inuse:
% 216.26/216.65  Done
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Failed to find proof!
% 216.26/216.65  maxweight =   23
% 216.26/216.65  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 216.26/216.65  Generated: 2988
% 216.26/216.65  Kept: 7
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  The strategy used was not complete!
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Increased maxweight to 24
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Starting Search:
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Resimplifying inuse:
% 216.26/216.65  Done
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  Failed to find proof!
% 216.26/216.65  maxweight =   24
% 216.26/216.65  maxnrclauses = 10000000
% 216.26/216.65  Generated: 2988
% 216.26/216.65  Kept: 7
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  
% 216.26/216.65  The strategy usedCputime limit exceeded (core dumped)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------