TSTP Solution File: LAT092-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : LAT092-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:25:52 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  22 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   22 (  21 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   13 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   68 (  11 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    join(meet(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2))),X3),meet(join(meet(X1,join(join(meet(X2,X4),meet(X5,X2)),X2)),meet(join(meet(X2,meet(meet(join(X2,X4),join(X5,X2)),X2)),meet(X6,join(X2,meet(meet(join(X2,X4),join(X5,X2)),X2)))),join(X1,join(join(meet(X2,X4),meet(X5,X2)),X2)))),join(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2))),X3))) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(prove_wal_axioms_1,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a,a) != a,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_wal_axioms_1) ).

cnf(c_0_2,axiom,
    join(meet(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2))),X3),meet(join(meet(X1,join(join(meet(X2,X4),meet(X5,X2)),X2)),meet(join(meet(X2,meet(meet(join(X2,X4),join(X5,X2)),X2)),meet(X6,join(X2,meet(meet(join(X2,X4),join(X5,X2)),X2)))),join(X1,join(join(meet(X2,X4),meet(X5,X2)),X2)))),join(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2))),X3))) = X2,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_3,plain,
    join(meet(join(meet(X1,join(meet(X2,X3),meet(X3,join(X2,X3)))),meet(join(meet(X2,X3),meet(X3,join(X2,X3))),join(X1,join(meet(X2,X3),meet(X3,join(X2,X3)))))),X4),meet(join(meet(X1,join(join(meet(join(meet(X2,X3),meet(X3,join(X2,X3))),X5),meet(X6,join(meet(X2,X3),meet(X3,join(X2,X3))))),join(meet(X2,X3),meet(X3,join(X2,X3))))),meet(X3,join(X1,join(join(meet(join(meet(X2,X3),meet(X3,join(X2,X3))),X5),meet(X6,join(meet(X2,X3),meet(X3,join(X2,X3))))),join(meet(X2,X3),meet(X3,join(X2,X3))))))),join(join(meet(X1,join(meet(X2,X3),meet(X3,join(X2,X3)))),meet(join(meet(X2,X3),meet(X3,join(X2,X3))),join(X1,join(meet(X2,X3),meet(X3,join(X2,X3)))))),X4))) = join(meet(X2,X3),meet(X3,join(X2,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_4,plain,
    join(meet(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2))),X3),meet(join(meet(X1,join(join(meet(X2,X4),meet(X5,X2)),X2)),meet(join(meet(X6,join(join(meet(X2,X7),meet(X8,X2)),X2)),meet(join(meet(X2,meet(meet(join(X2,X7),join(X8,X2)),X2)),meet(X9,join(X2,meet(meet(join(X2,X7),join(X8,X2)),X2)))),join(X6,join(join(meet(X2,X7),meet(X8,X2)),X2)))),join(X1,join(join(meet(X2,X4),meet(X5,X2)),X2)))),join(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2))),X3))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    join(meet(join(meet(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2))),X2),meet(X2,join(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2))),X2))),X3),meet(X2,join(join(meet(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2))),X2),meet(X2,join(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2))),X2))),X3))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    join(meet(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2))),X3),meet(join(meet(X1,join(join(meet(X2,X4),meet(X5,X2)),X2)),meet(X2,join(X1,join(join(meet(X2,X4),meet(X5,X2)),X2)))),join(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2))),X3))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X1,join(X1,X2))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    join(meet(X1,join(join(meet(X2,X3),meet(X4,X2)),X2)),meet(X2,join(X1,join(join(meet(X2,X3),meet(X4,X2)),X2)))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_6]),c_0_6]),c_0_6]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    join(meet(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2))),X3),meet(X2,join(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2))),X3))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    join(meet(X1,join(join(meet(X2,X3),meet(X4,X2)),X2)),meet(join(meet(X2,meet(meet(join(X2,X3),join(X4,X2)),X2)),meet(X5,join(X2,meet(meet(join(X2,X3),join(X4,X2)),X2)))),join(X1,join(join(meet(X2,X3),meet(X4,X2)),X2)))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_2]),c_0_2]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    join(meet(X1,meet(meet(join(X1,X2),join(X3,X1)),X1)),meet(X4,join(X1,meet(meet(join(X1,X2),join(X3,X1)),X1)))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X2,join(X1,X2))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    meet(meet(join(X1,X2),join(X3,X1)),X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    join(meet(X1,X1),meet(X2,join(X1,X1))) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    join(join(meet(X1,X2),meet(X3,X1)),X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    meet(meet(join(X1,X2),X1),X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a,a) != a,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_wal_axioms_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    meet(meet(X1,meet(X1,X2)),meet(X1,X2)) = meet(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_2]),c_0_12]),c_0_12]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    meet(a,a) != a,
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    meet(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_13]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.10  % Problem    : LAT092-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.02/0.11  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.11/0.32  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 19:28:37 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.43  Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.49  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.17/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # new_bool_3 with pid 7545 completed with status 8
% 0.17/0.49  # new_bool_1 with pid 7546 completed with status 8
% 0.17/0.49  # sh5l with pid 7547 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.17/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/0.49  # Search class: FUUPF-FFSF22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.49  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 163s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 7550 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Result found by U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.17/0.49  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.49  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/0.49  # Search class: FUUPF-FFSF22-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.49  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.49  # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 163s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.49  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.17/0.49  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.49  
% 0.17/0.49  # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.49  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.49  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.49  # Parsed axioms                        : 2
% 0.17/0.49  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Initial clauses                      : 2
% 0.17/0.49  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 2
% 0.17/0.49  # Processed clauses                    : 43
% 0.17/0.49  # ...of these trivial                  : 14
% 0.17/0.49  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # ...remaining for further processing  : 29
% 0.17/0.49  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Backward-rewritten                   : 8
% 0.17/0.49  # Generated clauses                    : 1060
% 0.17/0.49  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 930
% 0.17/0.49  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Paramodulations                      : 1060
% 0.17/0.49  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1404
% 0.17/0.49  # ...of those cached                   : 1143
% 0.17/0.49  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.17/0.49  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.17/0.49  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.49  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.49  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.49  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.17/0.49  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.17/0.49  # Current number of processed clauses  : 19
% 0.17/0.49  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 19
% 0.17/0.49  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.49  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.17/0.49  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 889
% 0.17/0.49  # ...number of literals in the above   : 889
% 0.17/0.49  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Current number of archived clauses   : 10
% 0.17/0.49  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 89
% 0.17/0.49  # BW rewrite match successes           : 7
% 0.17/0.49  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.17/0.49  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 169294
% 0.17/0.49  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.17/0.49  
% 0.17/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.49  # User time                : 0.042 s
% 0.17/0.49  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.49  # Total time               : 0.047 s
% 0.17/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1612 pages
% 0.17/0.49  
% 0.17/0.49  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.49  # User time                : 0.064 s
% 0.17/0.49  # System time              : 0.019 s
% 0.17/0.49  # Total time               : 0.083 s
% 0.17/0.49  # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.17/0.49  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------