TSTP Solution File: LAT076-1 by Otter---3.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Otter---3.3
% Problem : LAT076-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:01:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 2.75s 2.91s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : LAT076-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 08:29:56 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 2.75/2.91 ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 2.75/2.91 The process was started by sandbox on n015.cluster.edu,
% 2.75/2.91 Wed Jul 27 08:29:57 2022
% 2.75/2.91 The command was "./otter". The process ID is 11392.
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 2.75/2.91 set(auto).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: set(auto1).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: set(process_input).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 2.75/2.91 clear(print_given).
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 list(usable).
% 2.75/2.91 0 [] A=A.
% 2.75/2.91 0 [] f(f(f(f(B,A),f(C,A)),D),f(A,f(f(f(f(f(f(B,B),A),C),C),A),B)))=A.
% 2.75/2.91 0 [] f(a,f(f(b,c),f(b,c)))!=f(c,f(f(b,a),f(b,a))).
% 2.75/2.91 end_of_list.
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 2.75/2.91 strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: set(anl_eq).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: set(para_from).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: set(para_into).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 2.75/2.91 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 ------------> process usable:
% 2.75/2.91 ** KEPT (pick-wt=19): 1 [] f(a,f(f(b,c),f(b,c)))!=f(c,f(f(b,a),f(b,a))).
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 ------------> process sos:
% 2.75/2.91 ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 2 [] A=A.
% 2.75/2.91 ** KEPT (pick-wt=27): 3 [] f(f(f(f(A,B),f(C,B)),D),f(B,f(f(f(f(f(f(A,A),B),C),C),B),A)))=B.
% 2.75/2.91 ---> New Demodulator: 4 [new_demod,3] f(f(f(f(A,B),f(C,B)),D),f(B,f(f(f(f(f(f(A,A),B),C),C),B),A)))=B.
% 2.75/2.91 Following clause subsumed by 2 during input processing: 0 [copy,2,flip.1] A=A.
% 2.75/2.91 >>>> Starting back demodulation with 4.
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 ======= end of input processing =======
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 =========== start of search ===========
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 Resetting weight limit to 51.
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 Resetting weight limit to 51.
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 sos_size=98
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 Resetting weight limit to 15.
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 Resetting weight limit to 15.
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 sos_size=59
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 Resetting weight limit to 13.
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 Resetting weight limit to 13.
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 sos_size=43
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 Search stopped because sos empty.
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 ============ end of search ============
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 -------------- statistics -------------
% 2.75/2.91 clauses given 161
% 2.75/2.91 clauses generated 46433
% 2.75/2.91 clauses kept 400
% 2.75/2.91 clauses forward subsumed 23363
% 2.75/2.91 clauses back subsumed 5
% 2.75/2.91 Kbytes malloced 7812
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 2.75/2.91 user CPU time 0.77 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.75/2.91 system CPU time 0.00 (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 2.75/2.91 wall-clock time 2 (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 2.75/2.91
% 2.75/2.91 Process 11392 finished Wed Jul 27 08:29:59 2022
% 2.75/2.91 Otter interrupted
% 2.75/2.91 PROOF NOT FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------