TSTP Solution File: LAT045-1 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : LAT045-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 06:27:15 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.49s
% Output : Proof 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : LAT045-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.08/0.15 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 08:04:31 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.49 Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.22/0.49
% 0.22/0.49 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.22/0.49
% 0.22/0.49 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.22/0.49 Axiom 1 (commutativity_of_meet): meet(X, Y) = meet(Y, X).
% 0.22/0.49 Axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join): join(X, Y) = join(Y, X).
% 0.22/0.50 Axiom 3 (invertability1): join(complement(X), X) = n1.
% 0.22/0.50 Axiom 4 (absorption1): meet(X, join(X, Y)) = X.
% 0.22/0.50 Axiom 5 (modular_law): join(X, meet(Y, join(X, Z))) = meet(join(X, Y), join(X, Z)).
% 0.22/0.50
% 0.22/0.50 Lemma 6: join(X, complement(X)) = n1.
% 0.22/0.50 Proof:
% 0.22/0.50 join(X, complement(X))
% 0.22/0.50 = { by axiom 2 (commutativity_of_join) R->L }
% 0.22/0.50 join(complement(X), X)
% 0.22/0.50 = { by axiom 3 (invertability1) }
% 0.22/0.50 n1
% 0.22/0.50
% 0.22/0.50 Goal 1 (prove_orthomodular_law): join(a, meet(complement(a), join(a, b))) = join(a, b).
% 0.22/0.50 Proof:
% 0.22/0.50 join(a, meet(complement(a), join(a, b)))
% 0.22/0.50 = { by axiom 5 (modular_law) }
% 0.22/0.50 meet(join(a, complement(a)), join(a, b))
% 0.22/0.50 = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.22/0.50 meet(n1, join(a, b))
% 0.22/0.50 = { by axiom 1 (commutativity_of_meet) R->L }
% 0.22/0.50 meet(join(a, b), n1)
% 0.22/0.50 = { by lemma 6 R->L }
% 0.22/0.50 meet(join(a, b), join(join(a, b), complement(join(a, b))))
% 0.22/0.50 = { by axiom 4 (absorption1) }
% 0.22/0.50 join(a, b)
% 0.22/0.50 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.22/0.50
% 0.22/0.51 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------