TSTP Solution File: LAT045-1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : LAT045-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:48:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   12 (   0 equ;   1 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(3,axiom,
    equal(join(complement(u),u),n1),
    file('LAT045-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    equal(meet(join(u,v),join(u,w)),join(u,meet(v,join(u,w)))),
    file('LAT045-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    ~ equal(join(a,meet(complement(a),join(a,b))),join(a,b)),
    file('LAT045-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    equal(meet(u,join(u,v)),u),
    file('LAT045-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    equal(meet(u,v),meet(v,u)),
    file('LAT045-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(13,axiom,
    equal(join(u,v),join(v,u)),
    file('LAT045-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(16,plain,
    equal(join(u,complement(u)),n1),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[13,3]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:13.0,3.0')] ).

cnf(36,plain,
    equal(meet(u,n1),u),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[16,10]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:16.0,10.0')] ).

cnf(73,plain,
    equal(meet(n1,u),u),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[12,36]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:12.0,36.0')] ).

cnf(1025,plain,
    equal(join(u,meet(complement(u),join(u,v))),meet(n1,join(u,v))),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[16,6]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:16.0,6.0')] ).

cnf(1064,plain,
    equal(join(u,meet(complement(u),join(u,v))),join(u,v)),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[73,1025]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:73.0,1025.0')] ).

cnf(1065,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unc,[status(thm)],[1064,7]),
    [iquote('0:UnC:1064.0,7.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : LAT045-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun 29 21:09:37 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.20/0.49  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.20/0.49  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.20/0.49  SPASS derived 790 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 156 clauses.
% 0.20/0.49  SPASS allocated 63917 KBytes.
% 0.20/0.49  SPASS spent	0:00:00.13 on the problem.
% 0.20/0.49  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.20/0.49  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.20/0.49  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.20/0.49  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.20/0.49  		0:00:00.06 for the reduction.
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 12 :
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49  Formulae used in the proof : invertability1 modular_law prove_orthomodular_law absorption1 commutativity_of_meet commutativity_of_join
% 0.20/0.49  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------