TSTP Solution File: LAT039-2 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : LAT039-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:31:34 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.49s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 1
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 3 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 3 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 1 ( 1 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 3 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f13,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f12,f9]) ).
fof(f9,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : join(X0,meet(X1,X2)) = meet(join(X0,X1),join(X0,X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',dist_join) ).
fof(f12,axiom,
join(xx,meet(yy,zz)) != meet(join(xx,yy),join(xx,zz)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rhs) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : LAT039-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.10/0.11 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.32 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 01:05:05 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.48 % (4679)lrs+10_1:1_avsq=on:avsql=on:bsr=unit_only:drc=off:fsr=off:inw=on:nwc=10.0:rnwc=on:sgt=16:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsql=off:slsqr=211,119:sp=reverse_frequency:spb=goal_then_units:ss=included:st=2.0:to=lpo:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.15/0.48 % (4689)lrs+10_1:1_drc=off:fd=preordered:plsq=on:sp=occurrence:to=lpo:i=48:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/48Mi)
% 0.15/0.48 % (4681)dis+31_8:1_br=off:fd=off:gs=on:lcm=reverse:nm=16:nwc=5.0:sp=reverse_arity:urr=on:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.15/0.49 % (4680)lrs+1_3:1_ep=RSTC:sos=on:urr=on:i=33:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/33Mi)
% 0.15/0.49 % (4688)dis+10_1:7_drc=off:fd=preordered:plsq=on:sp=reverse_frequency:to=lpo:i=212:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/212Mi)
% 0.15/0.49 % (4687)lrs+10_1:128_plsq=on:plsqc=2:s2a=on:ss=axioms:st=1.5:urr=on:i=321:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/321Mi)
% 0.15/0.49 % (4697)dis+10_1:1_av=off:drc=off:slsq=on:slsqc=1:slsqr=29,16:sp=reverse_frequency:to=lpo:i=248:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/248Mi)
% 0.15/0.49 % (4689)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.49 % (4689)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.49 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.49 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.49 % (4689)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.49 % (4689)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.15/0.49 % (4689)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.15/0.49 % (4689)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.49
% 0.15/0.49 % (4689)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.15/0.49 % (4689)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.49 % (4689)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.15/0.49 % (4689)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.49 % (4689)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.49 % (4672)Success in time 0.166 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------