TSTP Solution File: LAT006-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : LAT006-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 06:41:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.59s 0.83s
% Output   : Refutation 0.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   26 (  26 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   26 (  25 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   57 (   9 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(absorption,axiom,
    meet(X,join(X,Y)) = X,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',absorption) ).

cnf(distribution,axiom,
    meet(X,join(Y,Z)) = join(meet(Z,X),meet(Y,X)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',distribution) ).

cnf(prove_associativity_of_meet,negated_conjecture,
    meet(meet(a,b),c) != meet(a,meet(b,c)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_associativity_of_meet) ).

cnf(4,plain,
    join(meet(X,Y),meet(Y,Y)) = Y,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[absorption,distribution,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(5,plain,
    meet(X,Y) = join(meet(meet(Y,Y),X),meet(meet(Z,Y),X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[distribution,4,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(7,plain,
    meet(meet(X,Y),Y) = meet(X,Y),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[4,5,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(8,plain,
    meet(X,meet(Y,Z)) = join(meet(meet(meet(U,Z),Y),X),meet(meet(meet(Z,Z),Y),X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[distribution,5,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(11,plain,
    meet(X,X) = join(meet(X,X),meet(Y,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[5,7,theory(equality)]),7,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(15,plain,
    meet(X,X) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[4,11,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(16,plain,
    meet(X,meet(Y,Z)) = join(meet(meet(meet(U,Z),Y),X),meet(meet(Z,Y),X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[8,15,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(21,plain,
    join(meet(X,Y),Y) = Y,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[4,15,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(22,plain,
    meet(X,Y) = join(meet(Y,X),meet(meet(Z,Y),X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[5,15,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(24,plain,
    join(X,X) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[21,15,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(26,plain,
    meet(X,Y) = meet(Y,X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[distribution,24,theory(equality)]),24,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(31,plain,
    meet(meet(X,Y),X) = meet(X,Y),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[7,26,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(35,plain,
    meet(meet(a,b),c) != meet(a,meet(c,b)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[prove_associativity_of_meet,26,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(45,plain,
    meet(X,Y) = join(meet(X,Y),meet(meet(Z,Y),X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[22,26,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(93,plain,
    meet(meet(a,b),c) != meet(meet(c,b),a),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[35,26,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(353,plain,
    meet(X,meet(Y,Z)) = meet(meet(Z,Y),X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[16,15,theory(equality)]),24,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(357,plain,
    meet(meet(X,Y),meet(Z,Y)) = meet(meet(X,Y),Z),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[16,31,theory(equality)]),45,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(362,plain,
    meet(meet(meet(X,Y),Z),meet(Z,Y)) = meet(meet(X,Y),Z),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[16,15,theory(equality)]),45,357,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(386,plain,
    meet(meet(X,Y),Z) = meet(meet(Y,X),Z),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[26,353,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(519,plain,
    meet(meet(X,Y),meet(Y,Z)) = meet(meet(Z,Y),X),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[353,357,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(520,plain,
    meet(meet(X,Y),meet(Z,X)) = meet(meet(Z,X),Y),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[362,519,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(521,plain,
    meet(meet(X,Y),Z) = meet(meet(Z,Y),X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[386,357,theory(equality)]),520,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(522,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[93,521,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : LAT006-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 04:57:41 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.46  * 
% 0.18/0.47  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.47   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.47   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.47   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.47   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.47   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  "."
% 0.18/0.47  * 
% 0.18/0.47  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-30T04:57:41
% 0.18/0.47  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n015.cluster.edu at 2022-06-30T04:57:41
% 0.59/0.83  
% 0.59/0.83  
% 0.59/0.83  #||
% 0.59/0.83  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.59/0.83  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.59/0.83  ||#
% 0.59/0.83  
% 0.59/0.83  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.59/0.83  ;      4481 formulas have been input or derived (from 91 formulas).
% 0.59/0.83  ;       522 (12%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.59/0.83  ;           59 (11%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.59/0.83  ;          463 (89%) are still being kept.
% 0.59/0.83  ; 
% 0.59/0.83  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.59/0.83  ;     0.001   0%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.59/0.83  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (3 calls)
% 0.59/0.83  ;     0.059  16%   Process new row              (3,952 calls)
% 0.59/0.83  ;     0.013   4%   Resolution                   (180 calls)
% 0.59/0.83  ;     0.059  16%   Paramodulation               (90 calls)
% 0.59/0.83  ;     0.166  46%   Forward simplification       (3,946 calls)
% 0.59/0.83  ;     0.013   4%   Backward simplification      (522 calls)
% 0.59/0.83  ;     0.015   4%   Ordering                     (6,715 calls)
% 0.59/0.83  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.59/0.83  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.59/0.83  ;     0.034   9%   Other
% 0.59/0.83  ;     0.360        Total
% 0.59/0.83  ;     0.363        Real time
% 0.59/0.83  ; 
% 0.59/0.83  ; Term-hash-array has 1,374 terms in all.
% 0.59/0.83  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 0 entries (0 at peak, 0 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.59/0.83  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 node (1 at peak, 1 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.59/0.83  ; Path-index has 1,202 entries (1,222 at peak, 1,415 added, 213 deleted).
% 0.59/0.83  ; Path-index has 870 nodes (877 at peak, 1,127 added, 257 deleted).
% 0.59/0.83  ; Trie-index has 1,202 entries (1,222 at peak, 1,415 added, 213 deleted).
% 0.59/0.83  ; Trie-index has 3,101 nodes (3,186 at peak, 4,055 added, 954 deleted).
% 0.59/0.83  ; Retrieved 77,922 generalization terms in 29,969 calls.
% 0.59/0.83  ; Retrieved 3,161 instance terms in 525 calls.
% 0.59/0.83  ; Retrieved 11,009 unifiable terms in 623 calls.
% 0.59/0.83  ; 
% 0.59/0.83  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 10 entries:
% 0.59/0.83  ;    10 with value 0
% 0.59/0.83  ; The agenda of rows to process has 154 entries:
% 0.59/0.83  ;    12 with value 25             10 with value 31               1 with value 36
% 0.59/0.83  ;     7 with value 26             15 with value 32              19 with value 37
% 0.59/0.83  ;     2 with value 27             21 with value 33               1 with value 40
% 0.59/0.83  ;     7 with value 28             13 with value 34               1 with value 44
% 0.59/0.83  ;    34 with value 30             11 with value 35
% 0.59/0.83  ; The agenda of rows to give has 384 entries:
% 0.59/0.83  ;     1 with value (4 21)         50 with value (4 30)           2 with value (4 38)
% 0.59/0.83  ;     1 with value (4 23)         42 with value (4 31)          19 with value (4 39)
% 0.59/0.83  ;     1 with value (4 24)         40 with value (4 32)           1 with value (4 40)
% 0.59/0.83  ;     5 with value (4 25)         25 with value (4 33)           2 with value (4 41)
% 0.59/0.83  ;    27 with value (4 26)         31 with value (4 34)           2 with value (4 43)
% 0.59/0.83  ;    47 with value (4 27)         13 with value (4 35)           3 with value (4 48)
% 0.59/0.83  ;    16 with value (4 28)         17 with value (4 36)           1 with value (4 54)
% 0.59/0.83  ;    29 with value (4 29)          9 with value (4 37)
% 0.59/0.83  Evaluation took:
% 0.59/0.83    0.363 seconds of real time
% 0.59/0.83    0.326693 seconds of user run time
% 0.59/0.83    0.036653 seconds of system run time
% 0.59/0.83    [Run times include 0.007 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.59/0.83    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.59/0.83    0 page faults and
% 0.59/0.83    24,244,064 bytes consed.
% 0.59/0.83  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.59/0.83  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-30T04:57:42
% 0.59/0.83  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.59/0.83  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------