TSTP Solution File: KRS263+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : KRS263+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 02:56:15 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.11s 2.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 27 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 70 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 10 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 75 ( 32 ~; 25 |; 14 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 63 ( 12 sgn 28 !; 9 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mighta_wtc_thm,conjecture,
mighta(wtc,thm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mighta_wtc_thm) ).
fof(mighta,axiom,
! [X7,X8] :
( ? [X1,X2] :
( status(X1,X2,X7)
& status(X1,X2,X8) )
<=> mighta(X7,X8) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',mighta) ).
fof(thm,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ! [X3] :
( model(X3,X1)
=> model(X3,X2) )
<=> status(X1,X2,thm) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',thm) ).
fof(wtc,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ( ? [X3] : model(X3,X1)
& ? [X4] : ~ model(X4,X1)
& ! [X5] : model(X5,X2) )
<=> status(X1,X2,wtc) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+0.ax',wtc) ).
fof(tautology,axiom,
? [X10] :
! [X9] : model(X9,X10),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',tautology) ).
fof(non_thm_spt,axiom,
? [X3,X1,X2] :
( model(X3,X1)
& ~ model(X3,X2)
& ? [X4] : model(X4,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/KRS001+1.ax',non_thm_spt) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ mighta(wtc,thm),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[mighta_wtc_thm]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ mighta(wtc,thm),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X173,X174,X175,X176,X177,X178] :
( ( ~ status(X175,X176,X173)
| ~ status(X175,X176,X174)
| mighta(X173,X174) )
& ( status(esk43_2(X177,X178),esk44_2(X177,X178),X177)
| ~ mighta(X177,X178) )
& ( status(esk43_2(X177,X178),esk44_2(X177,X178),X178)
| ~ mighta(X177,X178) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mighta])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ mighta(wtc,thm),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( mighta(X3,X4)
| ~ status(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ status(X1,X2,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X45,X46,X48,X49,X50] :
( ( model(esk10_2(X45,X46),X45)
| status(X45,X46,thm) )
& ( ~ model(esk10_2(X45,X46),X46)
| status(X45,X46,thm) )
& ( ~ status(X48,X49,thm)
| ~ model(X50,X48)
| model(X50,X49) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[thm])])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X97,X98,X99,X100,X102,X103,X106] :
( ( ~ model(X99,X97)
| model(X100,X97)
| ~ model(esk23_2(X97,X98),X98)
| status(X97,X98,wtc) )
& ( model(esk24_2(X102,X103),X102)
| ~ status(X102,X103,wtc) )
& ( ~ model(esk25_2(X102,X103),X102)
| ~ status(X102,X103,wtc) )
& ( model(X106,X103)
| ~ status(X102,X103,wtc) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[wtc])])])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ status(X1,X2,thm)
| ~ status(X1,X2,wtc) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( status(X1,X2,thm)
| ~ model(esk10_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( model(X1,X2)
| ~ status(X3,X2,wtc) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ status(X1,X2,wtc),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( model(X3,X2)
| status(X2,X4,wtc)
| ~ model(X1,X2)
| ~ model(esk23_2(X2,X4),X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X220] : model(X220,esk53_0),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[tautology])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
( model(X1,X2)
| ~ model(esk23_2(X2,X3),X3)
| ~ model(X4,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
model(X1,esk53_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
( model(esk67_0,esk68_0)
& ~ model(esk67_0,esk69_0)
& model(esk70_0,esk69_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[non_thm_spt])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( model(X1,X2)
| ~ model(X3,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
model(esk70_0,esk69_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
~ model(esk67_0,esk69_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
model(X1,esk69_0),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : KRS263+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 7 19:15:10 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.45 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.45 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.11/2.43 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 8.11/2.43 # No SInE strategy applied
% 8.11/2.43 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 8.11/2.43 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___107_B42_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0YA
% 8.11/2.43 # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 8.11/2.43 #
% 8.11/2.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.021 s
% 8.11/2.43 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 8.11/2.43
% 8.11/2.43 # Proof found!
% 8.11/2.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.11/2.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.11/2.43 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.11/2.43
% 8.11/2.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.11/2.43 # User time : 0.028 s
% 8.11/2.43 # System time : 0.005 s
% 8.11/2.43 # Total time : 0.033 s
% 8.11/2.43 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 8.11/2.43
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------