TSTP Solution File: KRS262+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : KRS262+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 23:20:53 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.58s 0.77s
% Output : Refutation 0.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 33 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 91 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 98 ( 40 ~; 30 |; 18 &)
% ( 5 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 5 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 73 ( 58 !; 15 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f131,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f129,f97]) ).
fof(f97,plain,
! [X1] : model(X1,sK19),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f74]) ).
fof(f74,plain,
! [X1] : model(X1,sK19),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK19])],[f42,f73]) ).
fof(f73,plain,
( ? [X0] :
! [X1] : model(X1,X0)
=> ! [X1] : model(X1,sK19) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f42,plain,
? [X0] :
! [X1] : model(X1,X0),
inference(rectify,[],[f27]) ).
fof(f27,axiom,
? [X9] :
! [X8] : model(X8,X9),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tautology) ).
fof(f129,plain,
~ model(sK0(sK19,sK19),sK19),
inference(resolution,[],[f124,f78]) ).
fof(f78,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( status(X0,X1,thm)
| ~ model(sK0(X0,X1),X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f50]) ).
fof(f50,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ! [X2] :
( model(X2,X1)
| ~ model(X2,X0) )
| ~ status(X0,X1,thm) )
& ( status(X0,X1,thm)
| ( ~ model(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
& model(sK0(X0,X1),X0) ) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0])],[f48,f49]) ).
fof(f49,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ model(X3,X1)
& model(X3,X0) )
=> ( ~ model(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
& model(sK0(X0,X1),X0) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f48,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ! [X2] :
( model(X2,X1)
| ~ model(X2,X0) )
| ~ status(X0,X1,thm) )
& ( status(X0,X1,thm)
| ? [X3] :
( ~ model(X3,X1)
& model(X3,X0) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f47]) ).
fof(f47,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ! [X2] :
( model(X2,X1)
| ~ model(X2,X0) )
| ~ status(X0,X1,thm) )
& ( status(X0,X1,thm)
| ? [X2] :
( ~ model(X2,X1)
& model(X2,X0) ) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).
fof(f45,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( model(X2,X1)
| ~ model(X2,X0) )
<=> status(X0,X1,thm) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f5,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( model(X2,X0)
=> model(X2,X1) )
<=> status(X0,X1,thm) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thm) ).
fof(f124,plain,
~ status(sK19,sK19,thm),
inference(resolution,[],[f113,f110]) ).
fof(f110,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ status(X0,X1,tau)
| ~ status(X0,X1,thm) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f76,f75]) ).
fof(f75,plain,
~ mighta(tau,thm),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f35]) ).
fof(f35,plain,
~ mighta(tau,thm),
inference(flattening,[],[f34]) ).
fof(f34,negated_conjecture,
~ mighta(tau,thm),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f33]) ).
fof(f33,conjecture,
mighta(tau,thm),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mighta_tau_thm) ).
fof(f76,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( mighta(X0,X1)
| ~ status(X2,X3,X1)
| ~ status(X2,X3,X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).
fof(f44,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( mighta(X0,X1)
| ! [X2,X3] :
( ~ status(X2,X3,X1)
| ~ status(X2,X3,X0) ) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).
fof(f43,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ? [X2,X3] :
( status(X2,X3,X1)
& status(X2,X3,X0) )
=> mighta(X0,X1) ),
inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f36]) ).
fof(f36,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ? [X2,X3] :
( status(X2,X3,X1)
& status(X2,X3,X0) )
<=> mighta(X0,X1) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f20]) ).
fof(f20,axiom,
! [X6,X7] :
( ? [X0,X1] :
( status(X0,X1,X7)
& status(X0,X1,X6) )
<=> mighta(X6,X7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mighta) ).
fof(f113,plain,
status(sK19,sK19,tau),
inference(resolution,[],[f111,f97]) ).
fof(f111,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ model(sK1(X0,sK19),X0)
| status(X0,sK19,tau) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f80,f97]) ).
fof(f80,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ model(sK1(X0,X1),X1)
| status(X0,X1,tau)
| ~ model(sK1(X0,X1),X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f54]) ).
fof(f54,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ! [X2] :
( model(X2,X1)
& model(X2,X0) )
| ~ status(X0,X1,tau) )
& ( status(X0,X1,tau)
| ~ model(sK1(X0,X1),X1)
| ~ model(sK1(X0,X1),X0) ) ),
inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1])],[f52,f53]) ).
fof(f53,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ? [X3] :
( ~ model(X3,X1)
| ~ model(X3,X0) )
=> ( ~ model(sK1(X0,X1),X1)
| ~ model(sK1(X0,X1),X0) ) ),
introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).
fof(f52,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ! [X2] :
( model(X2,X1)
& model(X2,X0) )
| ~ status(X0,X1,tau) )
& ( status(X0,X1,tau)
| ? [X3] :
( ~ model(X3,X1)
| ~ model(X3,X0) ) ) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f51]) ).
fof(f51,plain,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( ! [X2] :
( model(X2,X1)
& model(X2,X0) )
| ~ status(X0,X1,tau) )
& ( status(X0,X1,tau)
| ? [X2] :
( ~ model(X2,X1)
| ~ model(X2,X0) ) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).
fof(f10,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ! [X2] :
( model(X2,X1)
& model(X2,X0) )
<=> status(X0,X1,tau) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tau) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : KRS262+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat May 18 22:08:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ problem
% 0.14/0.35 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/0.76 % (10587)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10581)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10583)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10587)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (10587)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (10587)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10587)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.57/0.76 % (10584)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/33Mi)
% 0.57/0.76
% 0.57/0.76 % (10585)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10587)Memory used [KB]: 1064
% 0.57/0.76 % (10586)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10587)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.57/0.76 % (10587)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10587)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (10587)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (10586)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (10586)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (10586)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10586)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.57/0.76
% 0.57/0.76 % (10581)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (10581)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (10581)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10581)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.57/0.76
% 0.57/0.76 % (10581)Memory used [KB]: 1070
% 0.57/0.76 % (10581)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.57/0.76 % (10581)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10586)Memory used [KB]: 1063
% 0.57/0.76 % (10582)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10586)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.57/0.76 % (10586)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.57/0.76 % (10581)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (10581)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (10586)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (10586)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (10583)First to succeed.
% 0.57/0.77 % (10588)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.57/0.77 % (10585)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (10585)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.77 % (10585)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.57/0.77 % (10585)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.57/0.77
% 0.57/0.77 % (10585)Memory used [KB]: 1166
% 0.57/0.77 % (10585)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.57/0.77 % (10585)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.57/0.77 % (10583)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-10579"
% 0.57/0.77 % (10585)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.77 % (10585)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.77 % (10589)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/55Mi)
% 0.57/0.77 % (10588)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.57/0.77 % (10589)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (10589)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.77 % (10589)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.57/0.77 % (10589)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.57/0.77
% 0.57/0.77 % (10589)Memory used [KB]: 1066
% 0.57/0.77 % (10589)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.57/0.77 % (10589)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.57/0.77 % (10589)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.77 % (10589)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.77 % (10583)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.58/0.77 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.58/0.77 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.58/0.77 % (10583)------------------------------
% 0.58/0.77 % (10583)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.58/0.77 % (10583)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.58/0.77
% 0.58/0.77 % (10583)Memory used [KB]: 1092
% 0.58/0.77 % (10583)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.58/0.77 % (10583)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.58/0.77 % (10579)Success in time 0.395 s
% 0.58/0.77 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------