TSTP Solution File: KRS262+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : KRS262+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 03:31:00 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.92s 2.10s
% Output   : Refutation 1.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (   7 unt;   2 nHn;  22 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   40 (   0 equ;  23 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    model(u,skc57),
    file('KRS262+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(9,axiom,
    ~ mighta(tau,thm),
    file('KRS262+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(26,axiom,
    ( ~ status__dfg(u,v,tau)
    | model(w,v) ),
    file('KRS262+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(50,axiom,
    ( ~ model(skf61(u,v),u)
    | status__dfg(w,u,thm) ),
    file('KRS262+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(51,axiom,
    ( ~ status__dfg(u,v,wec)
    | model(skf68(u,v),v) ),
    file('KRS262+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(61,axiom,
    ( ~ model(skf68(u,v),u)
    | ~ status__dfg(u,w,wec) ),
    file('KRS262+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(82,axiom,
    ( ~ status__dfg(u,v,w)
    | nota(w,x)
    | status__dfg(u,v,x) ),
    file('KRS262+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(83,axiom,
    ( ~ nota(u,v)
    | status__dfg(skf99(v,u),skf98(v,u),u) ),
    file('KRS262+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(92,axiom,
    ( ~ status__dfg(u,v,w)
    | ~ status__dfg(u,v,x)
    | mighta(x,w) ),
    file('KRS262+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(95,axiom,
    ( ~ model(skf73(u),u)
    | ~ model(skf72(v),v)
    | status__dfg(v,u,tau) ),
    file('KRS262+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(112,plain,
    ( ~ status__dfg(u,v,thm)
    | ~ status__dfg(u,v,tau) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[92,9]),
    [iquote('0:Res:92.2,9.0')] ).

cnf(375,plain,
    ( ~ status__dfg(u,u,wec)
    | ~ status__dfg(u,v,wec) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[51,61]),
    [iquote('0:Res:51.1,61.0')] ).

cnf(376,plain,
    ~ status__dfg(u,u,wec),
    inference(con,[status(thm)],[375]),
    [iquote('0:Con:375.1')] ).

cnf(1083,plain,
    ( ~ nota(tau,u)
    | ~ status__dfg(skf99(u,tau),skf98(u,tau),thm) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[83,112]),
    [iquote('0:Res:83.1,112.1')] ).

cnf(1085,plain,
    ( ~ nota(tau,u)
    | model(v,skf98(u,tau)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[83,26]),
    [iquote('0:Res:83.1,26.0')] ).

cnf(2468,plain,
    ( ~ model(skf72(u),u)
    | status__dfg(u,skc57,tau) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,95]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,95.0')] ).

cnf(8433,plain,
    ( ~ nota(tau,u)
    | status__dfg(v,skf98(u,tau),thm) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1085,50]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1085.1,50.0')] ).

cnf(8446,plain,
    ~ nota(tau,u),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[1083,8433]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:1083.1,8433.1')] ).

cnf(9062,plain,
    status__dfg(skc57,skc57,tau),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,2468]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,2468.0')] ).

cnf(9095,plain,
    ( nota(tau,u)
    | status__dfg(skc57,skc57,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[9062,82]),
    [iquote('0:Res:9062.0,82.0')] ).

cnf(9100,plain,
    status__dfg(skc57,skc57,u),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[9095,8446]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:9095.0,8446.0')] ).

cnf(9101,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unc,[status(thm)],[9100,376]),
    [iquote('0:UnC:9100.0,376.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08  % Problem  : KRS262+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.09  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.09/0.27  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.27  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.27  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.27  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.27  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.27  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.27  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.09/0.27  % DateTime : Tue Jun  7 09:16:05 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.27  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  SPASS V 3.9 
% 1.92/2.10  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 1.92/2.10  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.92/2.10  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 1.92/2.10  SPASS derived 8830 clauses, backtracked 29 clauses, performed 29 splits and kept 4391 clauses.
% 1.92/2.10  SPASS allocated 90500 KBytes.
% 1.92/2.10  SPASS spent	0:00:01.77 on the problem.
% 1.92/2.10  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 1.92/2.10  		0:00:00.17 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 1.92/2.10  		0:00:00.05 for inferences.
% 1.92/2.10  		0:00:00.02 for the backtracking.
% 1.92/2.10  		0:00:01.43 for the reduction.
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  
% 1.92/2.10  Here is a proof with depth 3, length 22 :
% 1.92/2.10  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.92/2.10  Formulae used in the proof : tautology mighta_tau_thm tau thm wec nota mighta
% 1.92/2.10  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------