TSTP Solution File: KRS257+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : KRS257+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ebFCesztVK true

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:57:00 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.81s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  10 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  115 (  11   ~;   9   |;   2   &;  89   @)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    9 (   9   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0   ^;  28   !;   4   ?;  32   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(sk__51_type,type,
    sk__51: $i ).

thf(thm_type,type,
    thm: $i ).

thf(status_type,type,
    status: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(sk__9_type,type,
    sk__9: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(sat_type,type,
    sat: $i ).

thf(model_type,type,
    model: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(mighta_type,type,
    mighta: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(tautology,axiom,
    ? [F: $i] :
    ! [I: $i] : ( model @ I @ F ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl93,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ( model @ X0 @ sk__51 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[tautology]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl93_001,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ( model @ X0 @ sk__51 ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[tautology]) ).

thf(sat,axiom,
    ! [Ax: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ? [I1: $i] :
          ( ( model @ I1 @ C )
          & ( model @ I1 @ Ax ) )
    <=> ( status @ Ax @ C @ sat ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl10,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( status @ X0 @ X1 @ sat )
      | ~ ( model @ X2 @ X0 )
      | ~ ( model @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[sat]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl188,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( status @ sk__51 @ X1 @ sat )
      | ~ ( model @ X0 @ X1 ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl93,zip_derived_cl10]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl261,plain,
    status @ sk__51 @ sk__51 @ sat,
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl93,zip_derived_cl188]) ).

thf(thm,axiom,
    ! [Ax: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ! [I1: $i] :
          ( ( model @ I1 @ Ax )
         => ( model @ I1 @ C ) )
    <=> ( status @ Ax @ C @ thm ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl14,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( status @ X0 @ X1 @ thm )
      | ( model @ ( sk__9 @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X0 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[thm]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl13,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ( status @ X0 @ X1 @ thm )
      | ~ ( model @ ( sk__9 @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[thm]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl233,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( status @ X0 @ X0 @ thm )
      | ( status @ X0 @ X0 @ thm ) ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl14,zip_derived_cl13]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl234,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ( status @ X0 @ X0 @ thm ),
    inference(simplify,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl233]) ).

thf(mighta,axiom,
    ! [S1: $i,S2: $i] :
      ( ? [Ax: $i,C: $i] :
          ( ( status @ Ax @ C @ S2 )
          & ( status @ Ax @ C @ S1 ) )
    <=> ( mighta @ S1 @ S2 ) ) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl73,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( mighta @ X0 @ X1 )
      | ~ ( status @ X2 @ X3 @ X0 )
      | ~ ( status @ X2 @ X3 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[mighta]) ).

thf(mighta_sat_thm,conjecture,
    mighta @ sat @ thm ).

thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mighta @ sat @ thm ),
    inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[mighta_sat_thm]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl108,plain,
    ~ ( mighta @ sat @ thm ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl117,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ ( status @ X1 @ X0 @ thm )
      | ~ ( status @ X1 @ X0 @ sat ) ),
    inference('dp-resolution',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl73,zip_derived_cl108]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl236,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ~ ( status @ X0 @ X0 @ sat ),
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl234,zip_derived_cl117]) ).

thf(zip_derived_cl279,plain,
    $false,
    inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl261,zip_derived_cl236]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : KRS257+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.14/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ebFCesztVK true
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 01:23:16 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.62  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.62  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.62  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.21/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.81  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.21/0.81  % BCE start: 109
% 0.21/0.81  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.21/0.81  % PE start: 109
% 0.21/0.81  logic: neq
% 0.21/0.81  % PE eliminated: 4
% 0.21/0.81  % done 79 iterations in 0.065s
% 0.21/0.81  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.21/0.81  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.81  
% 0.21/0.81  
% 0.21/0.81  % Terminating...
% 1.31/0.84  % Runner terminated.
% 1.31/0.85  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------